Socioeconomic Status In Children

Children are greatly affected by Socioeconomic status (SES) from inception to adulthood. How the status and varying ranges of cognitive, health, and socioemotional attributes impact a child’s well-being is of great interest. This question is thoroughly discussed in the article, “Socioeconomic Status and Child Development.” It is understood that families who have a higher socioeconomic status have means, and capability to support their children. In addition, to finances, they have opportunities for a better education, social development, and integration for the entire family. The higher income families can offer a positive environment for ongoing development of their children. To the contrary, children of lower income families have high risks and lack opportunities to access the same supports for growth and development. Research shows that low income families have greater health-related risks for injury, poor medical attention, mental health issues, and learning delays which result in poor academic performance. Due of this comparison,

One example of social differentiation that Bradley and Taylor address is that people who are poor tend to be unhealthier than those that are wealthy. Although a lack of access to health care is one reason for poor health, there are other factors that play a large role in overall health. Some of these factors include the neighborhood one lives in, occupation, clothing, food, and other social factors. The first chapter of the book begins with the striking example of a

Regardless of social class most parents wish for their children to be happy, healthy, and successful; however, parents disagree on the best way to raise their children to be all of those things, which is when social class determines the parents’ child rearing method. Whether a child comes from a working class or middle class family affects the child’s development and socialization; and consequently the child’s future.

Annette Lareau, author of Unequal Childhoods Class, Race, and Family Life, revealed her research findings in this enlightening text featuring twelve socially, economically, and culturally diverse families having a child nine to ten years of age respectively in their nuclear family unit. These families were garnered from the author’s coinciding study comprised of eighty-eight children. Lareau, along with her research assistants, visited each family approximately twenty times. Visits included time spent within the home, as well as family events, school functions, doctor’s visits, structured activities, shopping trips, and church services. Wide-ranging contexts allowed researchers a unique opportunity to observe and record a multiplicity of interactions within each family unit.

Social determinants of health can be referred to as the living conditions that can affect an individuals’s health. Some of these determinants of health include; qualify of life during infancy, education, employment, working conditions, food security, gender, health care services, housing, income and its distribution, social safety net, social exclusion, employment security and aboriginal status (Raphael, D., 2010, Pg 148). Those with higher socio-economic status; such as the upperclass and the upper middle-class, tend to possess a majority of resources, as opposed to those with lower socio-economic status; such as the lower middle-class and the lower class. This situation is the basis of the concept of social inequality; income inequality

In her book, Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life, Annette Lareau argues out that the influences of people, in addition as race, end in unequal childhoods (Lareau 1). to grasp this, it 's necessary to infer from the book and assess the way during which race and people tend to form the lifetime of a family. The manner during which a family lives are often virtually entirely be preset by the people and race of the family. because they demonstrate, every race and people typically has its own distinctive manner of kid upbringing supported circumstances. To affirm this, the various examples that the scholar presents within the book might be used. For example: in ethnic households, oldsters are typically robust

Socioeconomic status has a large effect on poverty rates and occupational status. Commonly, an individual within the lower social classes tends to fall under the poverty line as well. Individuals who live in a low socioeconomic status area and/or are below the poverty line, commonly reside in living conditions that could increase the spread of disease and illness. A low socioeconomic status also means that healthy food is either unaffordable or too far away from resources that provide adequate food. For those in poverty, or with a low SES, this could result in overall poorer health, or even malnutrition.

In a sense, a person’s social statuses define who they are and where they stand in the complex structure of social standings with our fellow humans. Some of these statuses we strive to obtain, such as the development of friendships or climbing up the hierarchy of a profession; others are thrust upon us at birth or by happenstance. The former are achieved statuses, a fitting name as such status must be obtained by the achievement of goals set by either individuals or society itself. The latter, those statuses thrust upon individuals, are called ascribed statuses. These include a person’s sex at birth, their race, physical and mental handicaps, etc. Social statuses greatly affect a person’s life, as different statuses beget different reactions from society. This paper will touch on such differences in three areas: sex/gender, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Sex/gender concerns what sex a person was born into, and what kinds of expectations were placed upon them as they grow into women and men. Race/ethnicity concerns the physical differences of individuals based upon their families’ geographical origins- which can have an impact on traditions passed down within their family as well as determine how they are viewed within our culture. Socioeconomic status is a person’s social class, which is determined by wealth, quality of life, and profession. These classes include the upper class, upper middle class, lower middle class, working class, and the lower class.

Society is affected tremendously by our socioeconomic status. When dealing with the low end of this status, it’s commonly associated with lower quality education, poor health as well as poverty.

This essay will discuss ways in which a person’s socioeconomic class and his/her social situation can have an impact on his/her health, using examples. We believe that there is a direct link between socioeconomic/social class and health (Adler et al. 1994). I will be defining the key terms: socioeconomic and health, social class then proceed to discuss about how poverty, income, employability, environment and housing can impact on a person’s social situation and their health.

Everyone knows about the various stereotypes and social stigmas that come with socioeconomic status whether they will choose to admit it or not. Society has come to assume that a child who comes from a family of low socioeconomic status, that they will not do as well as a child who comes from a family of a greater socioeconomic status. Unfortunately these assumptions are so ingrained in our brains that we start to follow the self-fulfilling prophecy. When a child from a noticeably low socioeconomic status walks into a classroom, it is not uncommon for the teacher to automatically assume that the child will not perform well in class, and in turn either grades the child more harshly or does not give the child as much attention as the

Adolescence is a time period of crucial development. It is marked by a transition from childhood to a period of a young adult which then leads into adulthood. With such transitions come an increase in risk of sexual behavior in adolescents. Risk-taking has been proven to increase between childhood and adolescence and decrease into adulthood. The risk is associated with changes in the socio-economic system of the brain as well as social factors such as the presence of peers. Physiologically, risk-taking is partially caused by a lack of development in the prefrontal cortex and amygdala which are both vital parts of the brain responsible for controlling decision-making and social behavior (Steinberg, 2008).

The comparison of physical activity levels and pain symptoms at low and high socioeconomic status adolescents

Talent-Ed is a UK based charity organisation who pay qualified teachers and recruit university students to teach and mentor intelligent underprivileged adolescents, to equip them with skills and knowledge that are vital to their academic progression (“What we do & why”, 2016). SHINE Trust is another charity organisation who fund and develop a variety of educational programmes to help disadvantaged children and adolescents to fulfil their full academic potential (“What we fund – SHINE Trust”, 2016). Such organisations existence are based on a belief that those from families of a higher socioeconomic status provide their children with an array of services, goods and social connections that potentially contribute greatly to their children’s academic

Currently, there is a broad consensus that a negative correlation exists between socioeconomic status and mental illness in adolescents. By establishing the specific socioeconomic factors that induce mental illnesses in youth, disorders can be predicted early on. Many experts believe that wealthy children are likelier to develop mental health problems as they feel pressure to succeed or are isolated by their parents (Luthar 2003). However, it has been proven that poorer adolescents are more likely to develop mental illnesses than wealthier adolescents are. A negatively perceived social status, low parental education and income, and lack of social mobility have been proven as important socioeconomic causes of mental illnesses in adolescents.