Sociological Perspectives: Continuity And Change

1. According to the author, our explanations of social problems, for the most part, are based on all the following except:

10). However, mass unemployment, such as in Britain in the 1980s, becomes a public issue where a ‘structure of opportunities collapse’ and a range of solutions from political and economic institutions are required (Mills 1959, p. 10). Furthermore, Mills (1959) argues that public issues often explain what someone might consider to be a personal trouble, therefore, stating that people need the “sociological imagination” to realise that their personal troubles are embedded in public issues (p.10).

C. Wright Mills was an American sociologist who created the model of the sociological imagination. The Sociological imagination is a sociological outlook that links one’s experiences with societal occurrences. The Model consists of two components: “personal troubles” and “social issues,” as Mills puts it in “The Promise” an excerpt from his book The Sociological Imagination (1959,1; 1959, 3). “Personal troubles” is a micro experience which occurs at an individual level, in relation to others, and within the limits of a social setting (Mills 1959, 5). While “social issues,” is a macro involvement that surpasses an individual status and focuses on social structures and social/historical life (Mills 1959, 5; Cammer-Bechtold 2017). By connecting the two components, one realizes that broader social, historical conditions influence personal matters. To explain the sociological imagination, Mills used unemployment as an example

The sociological imagination is the term Mills uses to describe one’s ability to see things socially. It is the ability to switch perspectives and be able to see the relationship between the two, to understand history and biography within society (Mills 2). Being able to switch between personal troubles and public issues and understanding the difference and relationship of the two plays a huge role in the use of the sociological imagination (Mills 4). Mill’s uses unemployment as an example. In a large city where we have just one person unemployed, we have a personal trouble. You look into the individual to find the reason and solution. If in this city, more than half of the population is unemployed, we have an issue. Looking into each unemployed individual will not help here. We must consider the economic and political institutions of the society (Mills 4). Mills also uses the example of war. The personal trouble may be to survive or finding a way to contribute to the wars end. The causes of the war would be the issue in this situation. Also, an issue, if the war will affect economic, political, family or religious institutions. The sociological imagination enables one to understand the meaning of the larger historical scene.

Within society, there are many external forces in our lives that require us to adapt in a way that changes us internally. Society plays a huge role in how the world is constructed, as well as how we as humans are constructed to live. We often make the decisions that we make in our lives because of outward forces that may or may not be within our control, and it takes a toll on our lives. As a person experiences something that is out of their control, it is related back to social forces; this is what the sociological imagination is.

After a careful study and a deeper research on an introduction to sociology, I have come to understand that no problem can be solved well enough if one does not have the sociological perspective which is defined as a way of looking at the world through a sociological lens. In fact, there is the need of the lens that will help one to view situations and have the eye to emerge through different views to solve that problem. This mirror has become a doorway that will help one to have a beginner’s mind to approach problems.

According to C. Wright Mills, the sociological imagination is when an individual views his society as the potential cause for his daily successes and failures. Individuals often tend to view their personal issues as social problems and try to connect their individual experiences with the workings of society. Mills believes that this is the way for individuals to gain an understanding of their personal dilemmas. The sociological imagination helps people connect their own problems with public problems and their history. In order for an individual to figure out the causes of their problems, they first have to be able to understand the causes of the problems in the society in which they are living in. The sociological imagination tries to

He explained the difference between personal and social issues. For example, if a man is looking for employment and is not hired this will become a personal failure, but at the moment, this same man stands at the unemployment line and realize he is part of a significant percentage of unemployed people, these will become a public issue. A

In “The Sociological Imagination”, C. Wright Mills describes troubles as more personal problems that may be resolved by the one person they are affecting. Conversely, issues are seen as evidence of a widespread systematic error. He gives an example of employment, citing one unemployed citizen in a city of employed workers as having a trouble, or a personal flaw that prevents him from getting work. In the line of this example, a city where 25% of the citizens are unemployed has an issue preventing that 25% from working. Accordingly, people who are more individualistically inclined may be more prone to having troubles because they believe they are a product of their own effort. They do not believe that they could incur a problem at the fault

In this essay, I will use Mills’ conception of the sociological imagination to analyze my own biography. Initially, I will explain what Mills means by the sociological imagination and explain his distinction between personal troubles and public issues. Next, I will use my sociological imagination to reflect on my personal biography. I will take an issue, incident, or circumstance from my own experience and demonstrate how it could be understood as a product of social and historical forces. I will use Mills’ conception of personal troubles and public issues to explain my own biographical detail socially. Lastly, I will explain the interplay between personal troubles and public issues.

In order to gain a broader understanding of ourselves and the world in which we live, one must first understand ‘the sociological imagination’ and all that it entails. Mills describes this idea in terms of ‘private troubles’ and ‘public issues’ which continue to effect the lives of each and every one of us (Mills 1959: 8). While the connections between the two are evident, there are clearly a number of distinctions which determine the success or failure of either an individual or a society. Understanding that history and society’s issues come hand in hand also becomes an important part in further understanding the nature of these public issues and private troubles. Additionally, during the mid-twentieth century both men and women felt that these private and public issues could not be overcome, and therefore caused them to feel ‘trapped’ (Mills 1959: 3). Furthermore, public issues and private troubles are still prominent in the early twenty-first century, and thus individuals still feel as though they are unable to escape, and are confined to their private troubles.

Sociologists study human society. Their studies include human behavior in many social contexts such as social interaction, social institutions and organization, social change and development (Abraham). Because of the broad spectrum of social circumstances that are studied, unemployment is an issue in which sociologists thrive. Conflict in the areas of age, race, gender, and disability is common among the employed as well as the unemployed.  From a sociological perspective, unemployment can be studied through both the Functionalist Theory and Conflict Theory.  It also touches upon the results of unemployment in societies and institutions such as family, education, government, and health. Unemployment affects almost everyone to some extent

The sociological imagination is the “quality of mind” (Mills, 1959: 4) that enables individuals to look outside their private sphere of consciousness and identify the structures and institutions in society that influence or cause their personal experiences. In this way, by looking at the bigger picture, they can understand their place in society and explain their circumstance in terms of societal influence.

From The Sociological Imagination by C. Wright Mills addresses a distinction between personal troubles and public issues. Mills uses specific examples like unemployment and societal development. Mills explains the ability to connect the individual problems with societal problems. Throughout the text, we can see how Mills uses the perspective of an individual to explain the perspective of society and vice versa. Using sociological imagination, I will explain how education is influenced by society and history, and how there is positive and negative lessons to be taken out of The Sociological Imagination.

Moreover, Mills distinguish the difference between personal troubles and social issues. Personal troubles are personal challenge caused by greater social factors. For instance, when you have a lack of motivation to work. Further, social issues are challenges caused by greater social factors. For example, you got laid off from a job due to a financial crisis. Mills mentioned that many personal troubles have not become social issues yet because individuals do not treat their situations in a context of a social world. Thus, they blame themselves of not doing