Sociology Essay

Furthermore, removing the human experimenter and having all information provided by a computer may remove elements of the social desirability bias, as a participant may feel as though an interviewer would prefer them to respond in a certain way. Exploration is needed in the ways in which this bias may be alleviated.

Face-to-face interviews will be interview guide approach where there will be an outline of topics and issues that the interviewer will cover with the participant (Babbie &Rubin, 1993). Having an outline it allows the researcher to compare responses between participants and it reduces the interviewer biases (Babbie & Rubin, 1993). An outline is constructed where it will guide the researcher with the participant from one concern to another but in a conversational approach (Babbie & Rubin, 1993). Moreover, a study without any set structure the researcher and participant can get side tracked and not answer the questions needed for the study research. The length of the interview will be approximately thirty minutes, but there will be no time restriction. The information will be recorded similar to a focus group, with a recording device and notes occasionally. Before analyzing the data, the researcher will examine his or her “own thoughts and feelings” because it’s a crucial process in understanding the participants (Babbie & Rubin, 1993, p.

The experiment consisted of 60 undergraduate male students. The sample consisted of 25 Whites, 22 African Americans, 8 Asian Americans, and 5 students who indicated that their race was not listed. Additionally, the sample consisted mostly of second and third year students. The experimental design was a 2 (social costs: high vs. low) x 2 (type of interviewer: sexist or offensive). At the end of the experiment, participants were given a questionnaire that measured how likely they were to confront their interviewer. Each student was randomly given a pamphlet that depicted either a high or a low social cost. In the high social cost condition, the participants imagined that this interview was for a highly sought after job and that it was of the utmost importance because the job market was

Have the rising rates of AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases affected the sexual double standard for men and women? Should it? Why or why not? Use examples from the reading(s) to support your position.

Besides my survey I am conducting an unstructured interview to collect data. An unstructured interview is very beneficial to collecting information. I am conducting an unstructured interview, because I feel as though I

However structured interviews lack validity as many people lie and exaggerate this means that the results which are produced are false. Structured interviews also suffer from inflexibility as this comes from drawing up the questions in advance to conducting the research, this is because the researcher has already decided what is important although this may not necessarily be what the interviewee thinks is important.

Another strength of using structured interviews is that their rigid format allows the researcher to keep an emotional distance from the respondent. However, the detachment that is constructed may have a negative effect on the results of the study as the respondent may be used to gaining sympathy from members of society, and then become withdrawn from the

A main advantage of using a structured interview instead of an unstructured interview is that because the interviewer can standardise and controlled they are seen as reliable. Because of this, other sociologists can repeat the research and get the same results because they can ensure that the interview is conducted in the same

This may influence me to judge responses that confirm my assumptions about my research question as relevant and reliable while dismissing evidence that contradicts my assumptions3. Hence, this may introduce confirmation bias into my research when conducting interviews and data analysis3.

Most people seemed turned off by the idea of being “analyzed” and declined the invitation. However, four brave and willing souls agreed to the task. Participant 1 is a single 25 year old white female. Participant 2 is a divorced 53 year old white female. Participant 3 is a 26 year old white female in a relationship. Participant 4 is a divorced 37 year old Hispanic male in a relationship. After recruiting participants, this author constructed a simple questionnaire comprised of some of the most common self-focused questions asked in job interviews. (See Appendix 1 for list of questions

The interviews will remain instrumental to the study as they will provide the interviewer with an opportunity to interact with the respondents and analyze their current state of mind in relation to the analysis of the existent study objectives. Additionally, the utilization of the interview method will remain vital in the provision of a study background through the provision of additional data relating to the study. Additionally, the use of interviews will enhance the data synthesis process, which will enhance the adoption of quantitative approach pertaining to the analysis of the retrieved

The text asserts that there are many types of interviews. Indeed, there is a range associated with interviewing that is related to how much control the informant/researcher has. DeWalt and Dewalt contend that it is important for the researcher to study the community and analyze the interview questions beforehand to ensure success. The authors state that typically more participant observation and informal interviewing leads to more interpretable results.

This article at times left me frustrated at its negative depiction of the qualitative interview and that of the research experience for both interviews and interviewees. I don’t think I agree with every assumption stated by the authors but it did pin point how at times researchers are merely using their interviewees but I know the same could be said for quantitative research; but as mentioned in a previous articles, interviewees also benefit from this experience. As interviewers and researchers it is true that we are making some private details public, we do so in hoping to benefit other individuals in similar situations. While I understand the perspective on manipulation, every situation or circumstance could be manipulated, as researchers we can at times be the manipulator or the ones being manipulated. As the author stated this article was one-sided and bias I believe further evidence or experience is warranted to understand their point of

When conducting interviews in qualitative research the interviewer has roles that he or she may take on. One of the first considerations is insider status relative to the group that you want to study. Your level of insiderness depends on how close you are to the group. The more connected you are to the group, then the more of an insider you are. Taking the hypothetical from the book suppose that you want to study the subculture of drugs dealers. You could credibly play more of an insider role if you used to sell drugs or had friends who are drug dealers. There are advantages to being an insider such as being able to delve deeper into topics without having to learn the subculture and its associated jargon. However, as an insider, you may be too close to participants and, therefore, the topics discussed.

Holding face-to-face interviews minimize this challenge because a “trust relationship” is established with the researcher, prompting the interviewee to release and reveal more about their opinion. Furthermore, this technique allows to better understand the cause of their reactions, which was one of my goals. It also offers the advantage of promoting the validity of the data produced, to the extent that the answers are spontaneously generated by the interviewee and are therefore more likely to reflect what he or she thinks. To increase the reliability of the work, I was also committed to conducting interviews respecting the basic rules in this area (re-phrasing questions, sounding empathic and etc.).