Socrates ' Downfall Of Socrates

2066 Words9 Pages
Some persons may claim that Socrates’ demise made him appear as a martyr, and I disagree with that statement. Socrates 's beliefs were not intended to create a sensation of compassion or stimulate pity from the crowd. Socrates is actually just speaking in his usual tone. Moreover, it is also interesting how he has three children, but he does not reference his kids at all or that he is a father. If Socrates had talked about his kids, then that would have enthused up sympathy. However, that is not Socrates’ objective -- he simply does not request for the court’s forgiveness. He just explains why he is virtuous in depth, but he does not do so because of the idea of death. He says it because of his strong stance on his beliefs and his…show more content…
At the end of the chapter, Socrates has said his main argument in a detailed and persuasive way, so the officials just felt like it was being repetitive. This tenacious method of interrogating possibly allowed people to see Socrates as a martyr; nevertheless, in this position, it is not possible to identify if he was stubbornly looking for empathy for his conviction or if he is trying to reach a reasonable verdict. Looking at Socrates’ characteristics and how well he speaks, it is evident that Socrates is not a martyr. Socrates was actually very absorbed in his philosophies, but he was also too direct in his speech to ever give a thought to searching out sympathy. He is a person has no concealed purposes because he is very verbose. 2) Why is Irigaray a modern feminist? In Plato’s hysteria, it seems like Irigaray is using an allegory to acknowledge that there is an omission of feminism and the idea that why the non-appearance of women has not been examined. It may be unintentional, but it is a repetitive pattern in Philosophical works or works in general, which makes Irigaray a modern feminist. Irigaray mentions in the beginning: “Certain men, then – sex undetermined—are chained up
Get Access