Essay about Socrates and Plato's The Republic

Philosophers seek to better themselves as well as others around them, by self-examination and examining others. Socrates did just this, after the prophetess answered he questioned himself “When I heard the answer, I said to myself, What can the god mean? and what is the interpretation of his riddle? for I know that I have no wisdom, small or great.” Socrates then looked to examine the so called wise men of his time, trying to understand what wisdom was. All the while he was attempting to discern what the god wanted him to do with this wisdom. Socrates was disliked for traveling around and asking the wise men difficult questions. He contributed to the moral goodness by proving these men to not be as smart as they were thought. They had pride in their knowledge, a pride that made them angry at Socrates. However, Socrates was only concerned with helping those around him attain true happiness, teaching them that true virtue is inside oneself. During the end of his trial he does not think that such just pursuits should be punished, for all the good he has done, he believes it only just to be

Throughout the Platonic dialogues, in which Socrates always plays an integral role, Socrates challenges the preconceived beliefs possessed by the interlocutors in regards to virtue and seeks to educate them on their misunderstandings. Socrates adopts the most conducive strategy to educate the interlocutor, tailoring his discussions to the interlocutors’ personality and the circumstances surrounding the discussion. Occasionally, this ad hoc treatment impels Socrates to contradict himself. The foundations adopted by Socrates in the Euthyphro and Crito exemplify Socrates’ tendency to contradict himself between dialogues. In the Euthyphro Socrates argues one should only concern themselves with what is pious while in the Crito, Socrates asserts

In chapter 7 of Plato's book The Republic, Socrates describes the importance and benefits of education and philosophy. He makes specific points and examples to show that without growing humanity would suffer. Also, Socrates also shows how one man learning can change a whole group of people. Socrates proves that education opens the eyes of many and he does that by using the allegory of the cave. Socrates describes the allegory of the cave by describing a story about a group of prisoners that have lived in a dark cave their whole lives.

Viewing the painting “The Death of Socrates” by Jacques-Louis David, one can perceive many different subject matters, both literally and metaphorically. The obvious is seen within the setting of the painting. The clear illustration of where the event is happening provides the onlooker with a glimpse into a different time and era. Conversely, the artist has taken the liberty to hide deep meaning inside the work of art through less apparent means. Symbolism through art work has endured from early works to contemporized ones, here is no different. Taking the two aforementioned into consideration gives us a glimpse into both the symbolic and factual significance of the occasion.

SOCRATES Socrates was a Greek philosopher who lived between 470-399 B.C. He turned Greek attention toward questions of ethics and virtue and away from those of the heavenly bodies. Socrates spent much time in the Agora (marketplace) where he held conversations with townspeople. Socrates believed that real truth could be found out through thought and collaboration with others. He was known for exposing ignorance, hypocrisy, and conceit. Despite having many followers, Socrates was disliked by most Athenians. At the age of 70, he was convicted of atheism, treason and corruption of the young. He was originally ordered to leave Athens, but chose to drink poison instead. This great man valued the law over his life, and so he chose to drank

Plato was an Ancient Greek philosopher who lived between 428-432 B.C. He wrote mainly in dialogues, to stay true to how Socrates communicated philosophy. Plato displayed what is considered Socrates’ philosophy throughout the dialogue The Apology. In The Republic, Socrates is mainly used as a mouthpiece to communicate Plato’s philosophy. Socrates follows a philosophy best explained as “I do not know”, whereas Plato tries to find the ultimate solution to philosophical problems. In this essay, I will argue how Socrates has the best philosophical approach compared to that of Plato.

Despite the fact that Book I of the Republic is a monotonous and troublesome content to overcome, I gained some knowledge from perusing the content. What I got from perusing Book I generally speaking is that Plato's contention depends on capacity to demonstrate that equity is righteousness and makes the fair individual glad which makes equity significant. I additionally got from alternate endeavors of characterizing capacity as Cephalus contends that equity is reimbursing obligation and coming clean, yet Socrates' counterexample demonstrates that Cephalus' definition is fortuitous. Polemarchus contends that equity is doing admirably to companions who are great and doing damage to adversaries who are terrible, however Socrates highlights that companions can

Have you ever been in a cave? Caves are dark, cold, and often times dangerous. People who lose their source of light in a cave often face death from physical injury or hypothermia, unless otherwise rescued. The Greek philosopher Plato illustrated the difference between reality and illusion through a story about prisoners who lived their entire existence in a cave. Plato tells the “Allegory of the Cave” as a conversation between Socrates, his mentor, and Glaucon, one of Socrates’ students. Plato’s allegory of the cave represents the process of how a person achieves enlightenment through their life inside the cave, their release from the cave, and their return to the cave.

If a person knew that they were innocent of charges and could escape would they still face possible death? It is solely questionable why Socrates would continue to endure false imprisonment and the account of jealousy and thoughtless men. Socrates an astute and scholar; questioned the usual ideals of Athens. His forming opinions and thoughts Socrates challenged many ideals and theology of his time and men were greatly offended by him. Socrates had a way with the youth of Athens and this is what made him a wanted man and for all purposes a guilty man. At this time Athens was growing and transferring through a political change, one which Socrates was not favorable. Socrates did not condone the system of democracy causing him to have men further

Socrates’s anecdote of the cave presents a ghastly image: people who “are in it from childhood with their legs and necks in bonds so that they are fixed, seeing only in front of them, unable because of the bond to turn their heads all the way around” (193). Also inside the cave is a “fire burning” which allows certain objects (out of sight and controlled by others) to project shadows (193). Consequently, the prisoners believe that the shadows are the most real things. When a prisoner is released, he experiences pain due to the light of the fire. In time, he recognizes the truth and becomes accustomed to it. He is then “dragged out into the light of the sun” (194). After a few moments, he tolerates its rays. Most importantly though, he grasps “the sun itself” (195). Finally, the escapee is not content with keeping this

Around the fourth century BCE, philosophy in Ancient Greece arose rapidly. This early form was speculative, so it was based entirely off the reasoning process without any factuality involved. While the Hellenistic Era approached, philosophy was taken to a whole new level. During Greece’s Golden Age, Socrates emerged expanding on these basic beliefs by using his inquisitive mind. Although Socrates’ ideology set the basis for western thought, his dedication to his beliefs brought him about as a polarizing figure in Athens.

     The history of philosophy can be viewed as the result of the work of an obscure Athenian whose voluminous works, penetrating questions, novel ideas, and didactic teachings have shaped the flow of nearly all philosophic thought. It has been said that the influence of the ancient Greek philosopher named Plato has laid the foundation for Western culture. Plato was born to an aristocratic family in Athens in 428/427 B.C. As a young man, Plato studied poetry, but later under the tutelage of the famed Socrates, turned to philosophy, who introduced him to the ethical importance of the pursuit of wisdom. Plato was also influenced by the

In Crito, Plato recounts the last days of Socrates, immediately before his execution was to take place in Athens. In the dialogue, Socrates’ pupil, Crito, proposes that Socrates escape from prison. Socrates considers this proposal, trying to decide whether escaping would be “just” and “morally justified.” Eventually, Socrates concludes that the act is considered “unjust” and “morally unjustified.” Socrates then decides to accept his fate and proceeded with his execution.

     Plato describes a cave where people are chained up and can only see shadows cast on a wall. He parallels these shadows to the things that people see in the world around them, the materialistic reality that most people base their lives on. He parallels the chains to norms, customs, traditions, habits, etc. Plato believes that because people are so preoccupied with these shadows of the truth, they ignore the real truth. He parallels these shadows to the things that people see in the world around them, the materialistic reality that most people base their lives on. So, it makes sense that Plato wouldn’t want to discount the possibility of a philosopher king based on the fact that he has never seen one,

The Republic of Plato explores the meaning of Justice from both an individual and societal point of view. It also looks into the incorporation of Justice into human society, in other words, how to create an ideal state of social order in a society. This is carried out through the various dialogues and arguments between Socrates and other individuals. During this process, Socrates gave a detailed analysis of the formation, structure and the organization of an ideal State, and through this, vindicate the intrinsic value of being a Just person in a society and the virtues that each individual must possess.