Sodium Hydrogen Carbonate And Sodium Carbonate

1. The first experiment is Preparation of a Cobalt Amine Bromide Product ; Synthesis #3 was used to create the compound. Added 5 grams of cobalt carbonate to 20 mL of hrdrobromic acid in a beaker. Noticied a slight color change to dark purple. Solution frothed after it settled I mixed in 15mL water and

In experiment A the results from the precipitation of CaC2O4 H2O from the salt mixture were obtained by weighing the items listed on Table 1 on a scale.

We were assigned mystery powder convertible which contained calcium carbonate, baking soda, and sucrose. We found out that the mystery powder had calcium carbonate because when it reacted with iodine it turned orange/brown. When calcium carbonate reacted with vinegar it had a fizzy-like reaction. It also reacted with hydrochloric acid and that caused it to bubble. When we tested the mystery powder it also turned orange/brown when we added iodine. Also when we added vinegar and it also fizzed like the calcium carbonate. Again when we added the hydrochloric acid it reacted exactly like calcium carbonate, lots of bubbles were made. We know that the calcium carbonate was in the mystery powder because it had similar reactions.

These reactions can be seen from just a little bit of reaction all the way up to a complete change of the entire sample tested. Some samples of those tested in this experiment which showed the chemical reaction were the baking soda/ammonia mixture, the Epson salt and baking soda mixture as well as the food coloring mixed with the baking soda and bleach. 2. Which reactions, if any, do you believe showed no evidence of chemical change? Justify your reasoning.

The percentage error for both trials came to 79.6% and 85% so if only 20% of the energy was released onto the can the rest of it was released into the atmosphere and its surrounding areas. As a result, the amount of energy being released onto the can was short but the rest of energy eventually released at a high percentage because the energy does not disappear, but the energy goes out to surrounding and the air. Significantly, every calculation was taken accurately but the error percentage somehow proved inaccurate because we used the equation Q=m*Cp*T to calculate how much energy was being released by the sample and then we also used it calculate the Calories per gram which there we figured out the changes within the experiment then when we subtracted the result and divided it by 6.4 then times it by 100 it gives the amount of the percentage error to determine how much energy was released and find out where it ended all up to be. In conclusion, the energy released during combustion reaction goes to the air and everything else around the energy because due to the amount energy being released it can tell us how much energy went missing and find out where it all went to determine the error that went on during the

5. Was there any evidence that some of the copper (II) chloride was left in the beaker? Explain.

In conclusion, this lab was a failure. Not only was the yield very small upon inspection, but the product’s composition was unknown due to the unknown solution. Given the nature of the lab, little yield was expected and observed, making the lab itself very particular in nature. Add to this the addition of the unknown solution and any produce was astounding. Not only unfortunate, the unknown solution was very dangerous. If it had been some solution that reacted violently with the reagents, there could have been unforeseen damage done to the lab and the individuals

The goal of this lab was to determine the amount of grams of sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) required to produce enough CO2 gas to completely fill the lab and also how many Alka-Seltzer tablets that would equate to. This was done by collecting CO2 gas by inverting a buret and submerging it under water in order to calculate the volume of CO2 released from a fragment of Alka-Seltzer tablet. The main component of Alka-Seltzer is sodium bicarbonate, used to neutralize excess stomach acid during illness through the following reaction that generates CO2:

In this experiment, the precision of percent by mass of sodium carbonate was decent. It seemed to be consistent, although we seemed to have an outlier in our fifth trial. I believe this was due to human error of adding too much vinegar to this graduated cylinder. The accuracy of our results was decent in comparison to the rest of the class’s data, but our results were on the higher end compared to the averages of the class data, though not too high to be considered

The data gathered and calculated in the experiment accurately portrayed the way the reactions would have taken place. The chloride analysis was a little bit off from other groups due to the fact that our AgCl was in clumps, creating less surface area, thus our product took longer to burn and may not have burned correctly compared to other groups; yet there are several experimental factors that could have caused us to have different results than other groups, i.e. different measurements for samples. Our sources of error could have included eye measurement error, timing of set solutions error, measurement errors, and small calculation errors. Among other variables, the calibration of the analytical balance and spectrophotometer could have

9.Repeat the procedure with a new mass of baking soda. Before beginning, rinse the reaction vessel with water. Refill the graduated cylinder with water. Check water level in collection box so it has room for the water from the graduated cylinder.

The volume of carbon dioxide gas produced from a reaction was measured in order to determine what carbonate sample was used. A gas assembly apparatus was used to capture the gas from a reaction between an unknown carbonate and 6M hydrochloric acid; three trials were performed. The mass of the unknown carbonate was determined, and the reaction occurred in a test tube. The volume of gas produced by the reaction was measured, and the partial pressure of carbon dioxide was calculated after the partial pressure of water vapor was determined using Dalton’s Law of Partial Pressures. The percent mass of carbon dioxide gas was then calculated, and the average mass percent was compared to the table of known carbonates. It was concluded that the unknown carbonate sample used in the reaction was magnesium carbonate.

When sodium carbonate was added to the separating funnel, effervescence occurred, inferring the release of carbon dioxide gas as a product of the neutralisation reaction. As the process continued, pressure built within the separating funnel, so it was vital to open the tap, after continuously inverting it.

The soda ash form experiment 3 was obtained. A 250 ml beaker was obtained and rinsed.

Before the lab began, stoichiometry was used to predict the net weight of the solids for each reaction. For each trial, the crucible was weighed to calculate the true weight of the NaHCO3 sample before and after it decomposes. A 2g sample of NaHCO3 was weighed out in the crucible. Using a Bunsen burner, the sample of NaHCO3 was heated past 200°C for 4 minutes to allow a thermal decomposition reaction to occur. The sample was taken out of the heat and its weight was recorded to measure the weight of the new solid. The sample was put back into the heat for an additional 4 minutes and weighed again until there was no significant change in the weight to ensure that the reaction had taken place. After washing out the crucible to remove the possibility of a different reaction with the solid and to obtain