Nowadays, an average of 25,000 tonnes of solid waste were disposed of daily because of human activities of domestic households, commercial and manufacturing business and construction sites in the territory. This tells an imminent land pollution problem in Hong Kong. To deal with this problem, I discover three solutions. The three possible solutions will be increasing the number of recycling bins, landfill expansion and building more incinerators. The best remedy of the problem of land pollution will be building more incinerators.
The second solution might be for the Environmental Protection Department to increase the number of recycling bins. As the recycling method might help to decrease the number of municipal solid waste in Hong Kong,
…show more content…
It is only a short term mean, even landfills are extended, they can only last for a short period of time. For instance, the Tseung Kwan O landfill could only use for six years even if it is expand. This mean can only provide an immediate force to deal with the waste, but would not help to deal with the problem of land pollution. As we could not expand the landfills immensely, landfill expansion would not be a method to deal with the land pollution problem at root.
The best solution would be for the government to build more incinerators because they would greatly decrease the original size of waste and generate electricity.
First, the size of original waste would greatly decrease. From the statistic from the Japan government, using incinerators will reduce the solid mass of rubbish by 80%-85% and also the volume of waste by 95%-96%. This shows that using incinerators would decrease a large number of solid waste. Second, the generated heat could be used to generate electricity. As the heat from the incineration could be used as a kind of energy. The power stations could burn less coal and petroleum in order to release less air pollutant. This would help to ease the situation of global warning.
Still, there might be some people believed that building more incinerators might release a large number of air pollutant and have serious safety problem.
Critics may argue that burning waste pollutes the air, because the incinerator in Lai Chi Kok was closed years ago
Recycling is a very essential and crucial process in our world today. The term recycling means that waste can be converted into new products instead of being discarded. As the population continues to grow, humans are using more and more products. In order to reduce the amount of waste on planet Earth, and to preserve its resources, recycling is significant. Not only does recycling allow the environment to thrive, but it also allows living people to thrive as well. There are many materials that can be recycled. Plastics, electronics, aluminum, food and glass are only but a few products that can be recycled. Recycling can benefit our environment in numerous amount of ways. However, without recycling, negative impacts on our environment can occur. Some of these effects include pollution whether it is air, land or sea, depletion of natural resources and even an increase threat to global warming. Therefore, recycling is extremely important to sustain our environment.
Every year Americans collectively create approximately 208 million tons of municipal solid waste, which breaks down to 4.3 pounds of waste generated per American per day. In addition to this normal waste, the United States produces roughly 279 million tons of hazardous waste per year.1 All of this waste has to go somewhere. Two good methods of waste disposal, infrequently used, are incineration and recycling. However, any waste that is not recycled or incinerated ends up in America’s landfills. Landfills that are not in proper working order can pose a serious threat to humans and the environment, but ones that safely store all of their waste may possibly be helpful for the
Some of the risks of incinerating waste are that if it's not controlled incineration it could give off atrocious fumes that are harmful to human life and wildlife. Some of the benefits are that if controlled can lower waste by a large amount. Cost can sometimes be a gigantic factor in our waste management because of the machines used to incinerate the trash in a safe way. The fumes from the incineration can be very dangerous if breathed in because it's just a waste that is harmful already thrown out. This method will lower and raise pollution at two different rates. It will lower it by destroying all of our trash at a fast rate and raising pollution by the fumes that can fog up the sky. The skyline of our city will be affected by the smog that the incineration gives off, but with our filtration system, it can be stopped. This method is very useful, except that it can also be harmful if not handled properly. The design of the incineration machine can also play a part in how we can control the fumes that are given off. Our design is a way to turn the harsh smog back into clean air by filtering the polluted air. The tradeoffs would decrease because if this design works, then all waste in our city would mostly be burned and little bits would still be used for recreational uses. This can be a loss of cheap resources because of our playgrounds and benches we will have to use wood and plastic which cannot be cheap. We can save a decent amount of waste for recreational use in the future. If we save some of the waste instead of incinerating it all we can have a huge impact on our city's budget. The only engineering impact that would be more important would be making specific factories for the production of recycled material equipment. The engineering disciplines that we are using are industrial for
In Cuenlar, anything that can be recycled is, but anything that cannot be recycled is incinerated. Incinerating so much waste is very costly, requiring so much fuel. Working in one of the incineration plants can be very hazardous to one's health, and the city using incineration so much means more workers will have to work in these plants. A garbage incinerator burns the trash, releasing many toxic chemicals into the air. These plants not only are pollutants, they are huge fire hazards. They are using lots of fuel to burn this trash, and if some accident were to happen if all the fuel caught on fire, it would be an enormous disaster. These problems with incinerating trash are important, but they were not overlooked in the construction of the city and have
In all of the land fills you could do different things in each landfill because there are many of them the one I think that would be most predictive is using it as farmland because farms could buy it for cheap because no one elsa would want it and because it is rich in materials for the crops to grow elsa plenty of land for your livestock and building. Then the farms could sell there old land to people to build house and then it would become a more populated area for people to live at and it will become more and more populated.
Municipal waste dumping site is entitled places for waste disposal. Depending on a city’s level of waste management, waste can be literally dumped, separated for recycling purposes, or simply burnt. Poor waste management poses an enormous challenge to the health of city residents, especially those who live near the dump sites. The waste can potentially pollute water, food sources, land, air and vegetation. Poorly dumping waste can lead to environmental degradation, destruction of the ecosystem, and risks to the public health.
Recycling is one of the many ways to decrease landfill use. Some people believe we shouldn’t recycle, while other people think we should use it more. Recycling should be practiced more and is more effective because it lowers the amount of chemicals emitted, you get lots of useful recycled materials, and it provides many jobs for people in the United States.
Recycling can be one of the best solution because it saves landfill space, improves water and
Incineration is a poor alternative. According to The Recycler’s Handbook (Earthworks Group 1990): “Even with pollution controls, incinerators are the largest new source of air pollution in most communities. The metals, acid gases, carbon monoxide and dioxins. Additionally, incinerators produce millions of tons of toxic ash, which still have to go to landfills.”
We would like to make another expansion with our landfill, not to improve the lifespan, but to improve the amount waste that we would be able to collect. IESI landfill, as stated before, is already taking in the majority of the waste, so why add to that? Let us expand and be able to increase a maximum total tonnage a day to help the county out. If we expand then there would be two major sites for waste to be disposed in instead of mainly one. Along with that, it would become more regulated and controlled because the bulk of it is not sent to just one site, it would be distributed. I think that by splitting the waste between the two of us, the community would win in the end since no one area is accumulating the bulk of the waste.
Public garbage cans, waste management vehicles and even several businesses all promote the need for recycling. These things should serve as a constant reminder to us of the importance of recycling. Consumers produce a large scale of garbage (ARTICLE 1) the average American discards seven and a half pounds of garbage every day. The waste produced by Americans goes to landfills and dumps. Landfills are growing quickly, which are affecting our environment as well as our resources. This is where recycling materials such as plastic, paper, glass, etc., play a huge role in conserving our resources. If Americans take an active role in recycling, we can work to reduce the amount of garbage currently in our landfills and dumbs. Recycling has become more of a responsibility rather than a way to save money. It can help clean and protect our environment for each other and generations ahead. (ARTICLE 2) Recycling, the process of recovering and reusing waste products from household use, manufacturing, agriculture, and business, and thereby reducing their burden on the environment.
Recycling is something every person has thought about from time to time. We all know what we hear about it, and how it is supposed to help. Many people will let the thought about recycling go in one ear and out the other, because it does time a little more time than simply throwing everything into a trash bag. The world’s population keeps growing, along with the number of humans we are adding to this planet comes with more waste that we all produce over our lifetimes. It is easy to just throw everything in a trash bag and take it out to the dumpster, however, if we took just a little extra time to separate our items into recycling bins we all could make a big difference.
The average resident produces seven and a half pounds of garbage every day that is buried down in landfills and litters lands costing a great amount of money. Nowadays, people face no more critical trouble than the need to save the weakening environment, mainly in urban areas, where solid wastes are uselessly dumped. It has been observed that cities have no controlled structure for garbage disposal. Each year, millions of dollars are spent picking up litter and more is thrown away in valuable materials that could be recycled. As humanity develops new technology and equipment, the level of waste increases every day. Due to the fact that there is a huge problem with garbage disposal, government representatives must contribute to resolving
We, humans, are producing waste every day, polluting and destroying our planet. To save the world, many people believe recycling is the obvious solution. It is the process of converting certain waste into a reusable material. Therefore, the recycle motto is “Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle”. However, have you ever wondered why the word recycle is placed at the end? Well, it’s because it is not the only way to reduce waste and save the world from global warming. Recycling may have many advantages, but its disadvantages’ list is not a short one either. Recycling may look very simple and easy method, but when there is a need for a new unit of waste recycling, it takes up a lot of space. Not to mention the amount of money the building costs along with paying the staffs, buying new utility vehicles, upgrading the recycling unit and different types of chemical disposals. It is not only expensive but also, unhygienic, unsafe and unsightly with piles of waste materials on every location. These wastes spread infectious diseases putting human health at risk. Aside from recycling
Recycling is an essential part of reducing the amount of waste filling up landfills. Recycling materials cannot only reduce waste but pollution as well. Unfortunately the typical recycling programs such as curbside pick-up and recycling centers require significant commitment from the public to be successful which generally leads to low participation. However there may be a solution to the problem. The pollution prevention and reduction program suggests the use of materials recovery facilities. Materials recovery facilities sort out recyclable materials from other waste products such as compostable items. By sorting out the waste at one central location more items get recycled and waste is reduced without public participation. A recent article by Wang (2010) suggests, “The installation of materials recovery facilities (MRFs) can be an alternative solution to the problem of low participation of voluntary household and curbside recycling in fast-growing cities.” Materials recovery facilities can be a viable solution for waste management problems where public participation is an obstacle. This solution also provides less societal impact because lifestyle change is not as critical.