Solving My People Puzzle Essay examples

Carbonell, M. (2008). How to solve the people puzzle: Understanding personality patterns. BlueRidge, GA: Uniquely You Resources.

One of The most common problems that I face in life, is the need to get to know myself a little better. Whereas it is easy for me and others to get to know other people, it is quite difficult to know who you are, what you like, and what your interests are. Fortunately, personality tests such as the ones that are included on this paper, were extremely helpful at giving me some insight about my own personality. As a result, both test indicated some aspects of my personality that I can agree to, and other perspectives about myself that I never took into consideration.

gained a greater understanding of spirituality as a whole and a better understanding of myself and how my personality influences how spiritual I am. Personality may affect how I practice faith or how spiritual of a person I am in my everyday life and the actions I do towards me or towards other people. During my research for connections between my spirituality and my MBTI and Enneagram personality types, I have learned how my personality affects my spirituality on a deeper level and how it impacts my everyday life.

Asking someone to describe themselves isn’t always the easiest task, nor is it necessarily the most accurate one. Like anyone, my personality and my demeanor changes, even slightly, depending on who I’m around and my comfort level. Something that is dying off with each generation, seems to be a person’s ability to switch between formal and informal (both in speech and actions), dependent on if they are with their elders or friends. I have always prided myself on my ability to know when to make this shift and give respect when respect is due. With my friends, I might be more open and creative, with my peers whom I don’t really know, I might be more reserved and quiet. Essentially, what I’m trying to get at is this: you are all going to have your own unique and individual description of me.

This assessment shows its strength by the fact that I feel as though it matches with my life. Through this, I have gain insight to the fact that I could be helpful but almost to the degree in which I could be harmful to me. While reading the description, I was proud at some parts and discourage at others. However, I do have the understanding that every personality-type as a flaw. This assessment was useful in terms of gaining insight to my motivation, strengths and weakness of my personality. This can be a useful tool to use with clients.

People perceive me to always be friendly and outgoing. Reasons being I always look at the bright side of every situation. In my lifetime, I have learned the many bad things that can happen on a day to day basis, which helps me

This paper explores the results of my Prentice Hall Self-Assessment Library tests and reveals which areas of the test results differ substantially from my self-perception. In addition, this paper discusses those differences and elaborates on the areas that have provided opportunity for me to further understand the elements of my personality. The research of multiple articles examines the applicability of these significant characteristics and relates them to the overall function of my workplace. This allows me to identify vulnerabilities that persist and to investigate changes in behavior that will improve my work atmosphere. Dr. Fischer (2006) in his article The Gospel and Personal Reflection discusses the reality of human sin-nature and how, because of reconciliation through Christ, that sin can be overcome through the guidance of the Holy Spirit. This article fosters an understanding that God has gifted all people with specific

Although this was not the first personality assessment that I’ve completed, after reading this week’s study material, I can honestly say that I have gained a more expansive understanding and perspective on the subject. First, I had not considered the correlation between our covenant with God and the responsibility that we should maintain a similar engagement with one another on a day-to-day basis (Presentation: Lesson 1 – A Worldview Perspective on Organizational Behavior, 2012). While I knew that our personality type could provide context to how we may conduct ourselves in any given situation, I had not considered the broader connection to how our personality type also affects our ethical decision-making and problem-solving (Kinicki &

I have applied Carl Jung and Erik Erikson’s theories to my own personality. I examined myself, took a Jung typology test and interviewed family to try and gain the most accurate information to work with. I thoroughly review the concepts of both psychologists’ theories on personality. I surprising found analyzing myself very difficult, but it has proven to be a very interesting learning experience. This self-analysis has helped me identify problems with my personality and given me a drive to change them.

What’s your personality? Are you an optimist who sees the glass half full or are you the person who gets invited to social settings because you’re the life of the party? The word personality or phrases associated with personality conjure emotions affecting behavior and attitudes. A person’s personality is more than a phrase it’s a result of factors and situations. This paper will attempt to explain my personality according to the results of the Prentice Hall’s Self-Assessment and the Holly Bible. I use the word attempt because doing a self-assessment can be subjective depending on a variety of circumstances and emotions.

In their study, Schultz and Schultz (2013), state “personality is the unique, relatively enduring internal and external aspects of a person’s character that influence behavior in different situations” (p. 405). There are several theories about what develops one’s personality. In this paper I will explain my theory of personality and what lead me to these thoughts. My personality theory pulls from Dr. Murray Bowen’s family systems theory and John Bowlby’s attachment theory. One’s personality is unique to them, and no two people are exactly alike. To have a theory that would fit everyone’s personality is difficult, so my theory comes from my own personal experiences and the way my personality developed and changed overtime.

This section covers feedback from others on my self-assessment and journey of furthering my understanding of myself. For this exercise, I chose to share the results of the Hogan & Champagne Inventory as well as several of the key findings from the textbook activities. I chose one professional peer at work, Rudy Perez, and one superior non-manager (Bruce Monson), both of the Maricopa County Department of Emergency Management. I went over the attributes associated with an ISTJ style and both agreed that the test results were an accurate assessment of my personal style. My peer stated that he doesn’t think I am a full introvert as I have no problem socializing and talking with others that I know, though I am more reserved than him when we meet new people. My superior remarked that I am extremely dependable and he knows that I will complete whatever task I receive with great detail.

According to the Life Styles Inventory Survey, my two styles that were scored highest were that I was Affiliative and Conventional. Being affiliative comes naturally to me. When someone brings up a scenario to me, I’m always fair and look outside the box. Even when it’s close friends asking for advice or venting, I do my best not to be biased just because of our relationship. I’m known to be blunt and to the point while trying not to sugar coat things. When two friends are in a fight I’m not the first one to start talking to get into someone’s business, but if they ask my opinion or if they can’t get it settled I’d step in. Being Conventional I’d say fits me to an extent. I don’t consider myself to be ordinary but

This week I participated in a individual class exercise for my communications class. The exercise was to find personality and identity traits about myself. First I will identify specific traits that were similar in three appraisals. Second I will discuss differences in appraisals. Finally, I will describe what accounts for differences and similarities, and what it illustrates about how well we know ourselves.

In this assignment, I try evaluating my personalities using Big Five, discovering its relation to my job and finding direction to develop my