Solving The Material That Is Being Studied

This is the “disconnect that is growing.” It is possible that teacher assume students come into the classroom already knowing how to correctly cite sources.

Although some statistical evidence given is not backed with proper citations, the reader can find that the evidence given is effective in proving her point.

When looking at each of the articles presented, there are defining factors that allow researchers to determine whether or not it is a scholarly or popular resource. Of the two articles, one can assert that the USA Today Article is a popular source and the article by Baker and Algorta (2016) is a scholarly source. Each of these sources has their advantages and disadvantages due to the stylistic devices employed by the writers. With the help of each article, knowledge of readers and viewers is expanded, and while there are some facets that detract from the quality of the knowledge gained, the readers benefits from the time spent reading.

Summers writes in an informal tone and the article, even though he refers to a scientific data,

Not only do we have a tendency to ignore and misinterpret evidence that conflicts with our own views; we also have tendency to look for and recognize only evidence that confirms them. We tend to look for confirming rather than disconfirming evidence, even though the latter can often be far more revealing.

* This phenomenon is best referred to as a “cumulative collaboration of evidence” (Pepper 49).

For example, a Dentist could not write a research article on the best delivery method for babies because that is not their specialty. Therefore, good indicators of credibility would consist of evidence that the article has been peer-reviewed by other scholars in a similar field and the writer’s credentials.2 The “A” stands for accuracy, which focuses on ensuring that the information that is presented is not only up to date but also exact, detailed and comprehensive.2 Science is an ever changing field and research studies that might have been conducted 20 years ago may not be true today because of the technical advances. Therefore, it is essential that when dealing with accuracy certain indicators need to be considered such as the timeliness of the information, is the information presented in an un-bias approach and is the information

APA, known to many as an academic language curated by the American Psychological Association and heavily used by many academic, ostensibly in the field of humanities and social sciences. With the big hype on intellectual property, it is pivotal to protect the user from being accused of plagiarism. Citations also pay homage to the original author and render the work noteworthy (Gorman, 2017).

To develop a personal toolkit for critiquing research article, critical thinking that imposes intellectual standards will be the fundamental strategy employed (Elder & Paul, 2008; “Public Library,” 2013). Critical thinking will be employed to minimize bias from the literature review, which should provide a more solid springboard for the dissertation process. The intellectual standards that will be employed are clarity, accuracy, precision, relevance, depth, and breadth. Critical thinking should result in crucial questions and issues for potential research and the ability to articulate them clearly and accurately (Elder & Paul, 2008; “Public library,” 2013). In addition, before initiating a literature review, the focus, type, scope and academic discipline of articles will be determined (“Strategies for Writing,” n.d.). Focus will consider the thesis, predicament, or research question that will be researched. Type will determine if the search will highlight theory, methodology, or the kind of study, that is, qualitative or quantitative research. Scope will establish sources that will be considered such a range of research dates. Choosing an academic discipline such as business or psychology will help focus the search on literature germane to the dissertation goal (“Strategies for Writing,” n.d.).

The inception of APA emerged in 1929 when psychologists and business managers met with the vehement resolve to establish rules or guidelines for scientific writing. The people in the meeting incorporated rules ranging from punctuations, abbreviations, statistics, in-text citations, and references. These rules are significant, and safeguards against plagiarism rearing it’s ugly head. The acumen of those involved set a superior precedent, not merely an obiter dictum, in advanced communication skills. A precedent surely utilized by writers of the day, and a precedent for posterity.

The second area of agreement between the two areas of academia is the attribute of dispositions

The resources used can also be deceiving and seem to be qualified, but may only be just an opinion of that author. To avoid this, we must use scholarly, peer-reviewed articles to back up our statements.

In respects to the journals construction of information and literature, it would be difficult to find much to critique about the work due to the information being all within the journal and easily accessible. Due to the fact that this journal is well written and organised, instead of critiquing the writing of the journal as a whole, this paper will examine the study within the journal. The study as a whole was well constructed in regards to obtaining accurate information and accounting for error, but in truth could be better. This paper will evaluate what this study could have done to obtain even greater information. Before critiquing what the study could have done differently, the original study must be examined.

" Strong readers often read critically, weighing, for example, an author claims and interpretations against evidence-evidence provided by the author in the text, evidence drawn from other sources, or the evidence that is assumed to

order to have a basis for comparison with other writers (Holmes et al, 1985). In the case of