Some Legal Case Studies

BIS did not breach duty of care because according to "N.Y. GOB. LAW 18-105: NY Code -Section 18-105: Duties of skiers"  10-11, each skier shall have the duty not to willfully stop on any slope or trail where such stopping is likely to cause a collision with other skiers or vehicles and to yield to other skiers when entering a trail or starting downhill. Craig neglected his duty to both.

Laws have been put in place of the years to ensure that everyone has equal opportunities when it comes to getting a job, keeping a job, and having access to goods, services, and locations. Several of the laws that have been enacted over the years include the Family Medical Leave Act of 1993, the Age Discrimination Act of 1967, and the Americans with Disabilities of 1990.

What type of exemption means he probably won't have to provide disclosure reports to the government or buyers?

Per the order received, the court suspended this case effective 1/11/17, with the NCP order to pay $350.00 per month on arrearage owed as of the suspension date.Fiscal reviewed case accounts; case overcharged by six months at the rate of $449.00 per month. . Therefore, the WC account balance was adjusted to $0.00 and the WA account balance was adjusted to $17,215.13. Caseworker A. Brant submitted the fiscal request.

Here, the court is likely to hold, that Mr. Cylkowski was not in actual physical control of his truck. Mr. Cylkowski was in the passenger seat without the physical, logistical ability to exercise control and operation of his truck. Like the defendant in Brockman, our client entered on and was found on the passenger’s side of the vehicle. Furthermore, like the defendant’s truck in Brockman, there is a console in the center of the truck that creates a large barrier between the driver and passenger seats. It would be logistically impossible for Mr. Cylkowski to start the engine of the vehicle from the position in which he was found. Additionally, unless Mr. Cylkowski is a small man, he would have to exit the vehicle and enter from the driver’s

Lisa Levan 231 Rasberry St. Bethlehem, Pa. 18018 (610) 442-6327 was advised of the identity of Investigator Sean P. Brennan and of the confidential nature and purpose of the interview, Levan, provided the following information:

On 08/18/2015, Barbara Feeman contacted Pasco Sheriff`s Office by telephone to report a Petit Theft.

Felipe was a first grader at Littlewood Elementary School. English is his second language and Portuguese is his primary language. Felipe is fluent in speaking, listening, reading, and writing in the English language.

I informed Ms. Ray that I needed to discuss some concerns with her regarding the RA, Maria Evans.

“Australian courts are bound to apply Australian statute law ‘even if that law should violate a rule of international law’. International law does not form part of Australian law until it has been enacted in legislation. In construing an Australian statute, our courts will read ‘general words ... subject to the established rules of international law’ unless a contrary intention appears from the statute. In this case, there is no occasion to invoke this principle of statutory construction. The terms of the Act are specific. They leave no doubt as to its operation” .

In the first scenario, a police officer received information from an informant that a suspect in a high crime area was illegally carrying a firearm. The officer stopped a suspect and preformed a frisk finding the weapon. As the officer handcuffed the suspect, he fled into a residence where there were drugs on the table. Ultimately, the officer arrested the male and he was charged for the weapon and drugs. The first action the officer had to take was determine if there was enough reasonable suspicion to stop and frisk the suspect. Reasonable suspicion is defined as reasonableness to suspect a crime has occurred/is occurring. In recent court case the court ruled that an anonymous tip that a person is carrying a gun

Kate is the owner of a successful business, selling women’s shoes. Her business is expanding fast and she wants to upgrade her business structure to a more appropriate one. What would be your recommendation to Kate and why? What are the factors that influence you with this advice?

Pierce v. Society of Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary, 268 U.S. 510 (1925)

Olley v Marlborough Court Ltd [1949] 1 All ER 127 (UK Court of Appeal), Reg Glass Pty Ltd v Rivers Locking Systems Pty Ltd (1968) 120 CLR 516 (High Court)

Contracts, business, and laws are three simple little words, but when put together they have a substantial impact on our everyday lives. Below we will discuss three case studies. The first case is between Chris, Matt, and Ian vs. Donald Margolin, who was injured when he used an aftershave lotion that he bought off the internet called Funny Face. The second case is between Sam, his landlord, and a national chain store. Sam is being accused of conducting business from his apartment and going back on a verbal promise. In the last case is two lifelong friends who decided to join in a partnership and open up a sporting goods shop. Therefore, before the appropriate court can proceed with the first case, the court should take into several considerations around the rules of jurisdiction, alternative dispute resolution (ADR), and whether or not corporation/or corporate offices can be held for the criminal or potential act. In the second case before the court can rule the court should determine the various elements of a valid contract, if a quasi-contract exists, a promissory estoppel, and the rights an obligation of a tenant would prevail on Sam 's claims. Finally, in the third case between Jeb and Josh, they should determine the type of business entity that will overall protect their business and personal needs.