Something

1. System Thinking: System thinking is nothing but instead of focusing on only one particular issue, we have to analyze and try to understand the entire system on the whole. With this kind of analyzation, we can easily find a solution to the problem as the problems are not confined to only a particular area or time. We might find a solution for a particular issue, somewhere in the whole system by analyzing the entire system completely. We should try to relate the actions and the consequences on the whole as the issues occur at different time levels, not confined to only one particular time level. We have to have knowledge of the relation between different departments of an organization and the relation between them and the functionality between the departments as to how they are related in an organization. We generally focus on only one particular issue rather than seeing the bug picture and that shouldn’t be done. In system thinking we analyze the big picture.

The Organizations have evolved over the years and from the Concept of people management they slowly have moved towards the concept of System managements and this is how an organizations needs to aim to grow and to succeed in growing complex market environment.

Once of the most important activity for humans is managing. It has existed from the begining of the time when the social organisations were formed to achieve the aims and objectives which could not have been accomplished by the individuals, managing has been an essential part to ensure coordination of individual efforts. As the society continously rely on group efforts and the organisation groups become larger, the task of managers have become more complex and demanding. Henceforth, managerial theories have become crucial in the way complex organisations .are managed.Three of the most recognised management theories are Quantative approch, systemic approch, Contingency approach. (Dawson, 2000)

The different approaches to management have been changed, fine tuned and discarded over the years. In the coming paragraphs we will take a look at the contemporary approaches. We will examine how they compare to each other as well as if they can be utilized in the three types of environments; internal, competitive and macro environment.

Effective systems thinking can help improve complex organizations and meet the three above challenges. According to the Laws of the Fifth Discipline, systems thinking can help speed up decision making by giving insight on problems (Cathon, 2000). Specifically, personal mastery is honest reflection and evaluation that identifies needs that contribute to the achievement of organizational goals. This can also help with conflicts by being honest with ourselves and having a shared vision with the organization. Next, conflicts can be resolved better because systems thinking allows a network of groups and individuals to work as a family (Meadows, 2008). Finally, competitive organizations know how to learn and understand all

The General Systems Theory (GST) came about as an effort to describe the systems approach, born from the biological concept of the organism developed in the first part of the 20th century (Von Bertalanffy, 1972). In contrast to the mechanistic systems which are closed and have a direct relationship between a cause and its effect, a biological or social system is open, operating on a principle of equifinality, where regardless of the starting point, the objective can be achieved (Kast & Rosenzweig, 1972). Any system will achieve equilibrium, but an open system can reach a steady state by accessing resources from outside itself (Kast & Rosenzweig, 1972). The underlying assumptions of GST rely on the organization of a company resembling the inner workings of an organism. However, subgroups within organizations can act independently of the the whole, in

When trying to maintain a healthy organizational culture the leader has many factors that he/she must balance. Maintaining a healthy organizational culture may be viewed as an entire strategic

It is defined as all the forces or conditions that are available within an environment that affects an organization and business. It is also known as controllable factors because business can control them. The internal environment deals with the management of resources like human resources, physical resources, technology, monetary resources and others that constitute the organization in order to implement or execute a strategy. Internal environment also includes culture and other intangible aspects like teamwork, coordination, efficiency level of employees, employee’s salaries and monitoring costs. The strategy for competition should also be in sync with the internal resources especially the internal environment.

Systems thinking is a method of thinking that looks at the interconnectedness between different elements rather than a linear cause and effect approach and sees patterns of change rather than fixed “snapshots”. In essence it is a view on the “whole picture” (Anderson, R 1994).

Managing internal operation is the most important task for an organisation especially a multinational company. A good managing system can bring the whole company to the next level. While a poor managing system will cause tons of problems. In fact, the point of managing internal operation require level of strategy of understanding not on consumer behaviour, but the employee’s attitude and performance towards the company itself.

I am writing this term paper to get a better understanding of management and the many factors of management. People and businesses have come a long way since the beginning of time. Technology is always evolving and becoming more effective and efficient in many ways that we live our lives. What was once an idea or a thought on lined paper, becomes reality in just a matter of seconds. Also, the way that we communicate and interact with one another is evolving faster than we have ever imagined it to. While every organization is different, in all organizations there has to be some sort of management to achieve specific objectives and goals. Management is the process of using organizational goals efficiently and effectively. While Technology is constantly evolving the way that management is handled evolves as well. There are several different elements to think about when it comes to management. For example, management is made up by organizing, controlling, leading, and planning a business or organization. Management is often thought of as a factor of production along with money, machines, and materials. In management the people who plan, lead, organize, and control are considered managers. Managers have the responsibility and power to make decisions and oversee the corporation. “The size of management can range from one person in a small organization to hundreds or thousands of managers in multinational companies” (“Business dictionary,” 2016). There are typically

Management is a vital component to be recognized in every organization. Without an effective and an efficient management, an organization will not run successfully. Throughout the years development of management theories have been characterized by different beliefs from various people about what and how managers need to fulfil their specific tasks in their own dynamic business environment. These management theories have been applied on human 's daily activities and decision making.

Management has been practiced for thousands of years. The management approaches are there to help individuals that want to set up their own business. It gives them a variety of views from all different angles to help them start off. The most common management approaches include Classical, Behavioural and Contingency.

In this chapter, how management thought has evolved in modern times and the central concerns that have guided ongoing advances in management theory are explored. First, the classical management theories that emerged around the turn of the twentieth century are examined. Next, behavioral management theories developed before and after World War II are examined, and then management science theory, which developed during the second World War. Finally, the theories developed to help explain how the external environment affects the way organizations and managers operate are examined.

Situations are all different. No attempt to identify principles. Limited value for developing management theory . INTERPERSONAL BEHAVIOUR APPROACH Ignores planning, organising and controlling. Psychological training is not enough to become an effective manager. GROUP BEHAVIOUR APPROACH