Sons Of Liberty Analysis

12). With violence comes fear and that is what they instilled in the hearts of the Britain’s and their loyalists who lived in the colonies. For example, in April, 1765, the Governor of New York expected to get a shipment of paper goods. Once the Governor found out that the Sons of Liberty knew about the shipment he locked himself inside Fort George because he was scared for his life. The Governor had every right to be scared, seeming as though the Sons of Liberty arrived at his house after he received his package and proceeded to burn his transportation. The angry mob then set their sights on a commander at Fort George and began to loot and vandalize his house. They did all of that destruction in the name of what? “Patriotism”? I think not. The Sons of Liberty were murderous bullies who tarred and feathered people who were loyal to Britain, the act of tarring someone is terroristic enough. A patriot fights for what they believe in yes, but not to the extent of killing people before they exhausted all peaceful options. The Sons of Liberty even had, “cooperation with undisciplined and extralegal groups to set off violent actions” (Kramer par. 15). I mean, come on! They used outside help to instill fear so they could get their point

Were the Sons of Liberty terrorists or patriots? The Sons of Liberty were patriots. Most of leaders in the Sons were people who were moving the revolution forward like Benjamin Franklin, George Washington, Samuel Adams, and John Hancock. The Sons started in the Committees of Correspondence, thus explaining the relationship of the famous people in both the committee and the Sons of Liberty. Sure the sons looked like terrorists on paper to the british like by burn the paper and destroying tea in the harbor. These things were done to help the american people by making the british get rid of the taxes. By doing these made the british mad so there became more taxes like the Townshend acts and the Intolerable acts. The taxes become so ridiculous

The colonists were in every right, aspect and mind, not only justified but also it was about time that they stood of and actually take action against the British. The choice of going to war with them, was the only choice that they had. All diplimatical options that they had ceased to stand a chance against the tyrant Britain. From the very beginning when the colonists felt upset against their mother country and the way that they went about the law making, up until the beginning of the war, they tried all diplimatical options that they had, by sending letters, you name it. When they didn’t work then they had no other means but to declare war.

By suddenly ending “salutary neglect”, the British Parliament had, unknowing, prompted the beginnings of the Americans' grievances. Though not much protest occurred in response to the Proclamation (most colonists moved West anyways), the Act itself would set a precedent for Americans' sense of anxiety. The first direct tax on the American colonies, the Stamp act, contributed significantly to the beginnings of pre-Revolutionary unity. With the rallying battle cry, “No taxation without representation”, the American colonists proceeded to call together the Stamp Act Congress. Not only was this event significant due to the fact that it was another group meeting, automatically signifying at least some unity, but major proponents of Revolution, such as Samuel Adams, started new efforts towards uniting colonists against Britain, such as the Sons of Liberty. The following several years, though not marked with tremendous amounts of unification, definitely contributed to a growing sense of anxiety and oppression amongst the American colonists. With more direct taxes such as the Tea Acts, Coercive Acts, and Quartering Acts. Grievance after grievance, the number of “unreasonable” British actions inevitably forced the Americans into a dilemma. While some colonists, such as Richmond Henry Lee, equated such acts to the British desire to “ruin” the colonies, others, such as Mather Byles, believed that a radical

The Patriots idea of freedom and liberty was the exact opposite. They wanted to be free from the king and beat his army. They fought to win freedom and to be able to govern their own colonies without the king. Although some slaves fought in the war many others worked for Loyalists families like the Locktons. These families believed they would have freedom if they should win the war and leave the king to reign. The mayor of New York believed that if they killed the patriot’s commander they could win. He stated on page 90 that, “We must kill their commander.” This was said in a secret meeting of loyalists pretending to be patriots. All of the men in the room signed a document agreeing to the plan. This was their idea of liberty and freedom. In a real letter written by Alexander Wedderburn to the king (a primary source found on page 117), he writes, “Sir we have been too long deaf. We have too long shown our forbearance and longsuffering… Our thunders must go forth. America must be conquered.” But, the Patriots idea of freedom and liberty was the exact opposite. They wanted to free from the king and beat his army. In the book on page 256, Isabel narrates, “Washington’s troops chased the British battlefield, killed a passel of them and took a couple hundred prisoners.” They fought to win freedom and be able to govern their own colonies without the king. The way these groups of people thought of freedom and liberty affected

The Sons of Liberty was an organization that was created in the Thirteen American Colonies.The secret group was formed to protect the rights of the colonists and to fight taxation by the British government.By the end of the year the Sons of Liberty existed to every colony.The Sons of Liberty formed out of a number of smaller protest groups in 1765.The first group was formed out of the Loyal Nine in Boston with other groups soon forming in New York and Connecticut.

In conclusion, the Colonists were very justified in waging war as they were being over taxed, being ruled from across the sea, and weren’t being taken seriously. The main reason was that the King was no longer for his people and was for the money instead. They were rightly justified because a leader of a country should always be for his people. These reasons helped the Colonists because it gave them a reason to keep going when things got tough. They could see the future of this country and they continued to fight until they could live their vision and

The Daughters of Liberty were a successful Colonial American group, established in the year 1765, that consisted of women who displayed their loyalty by participating in boycotts of British goods following the passage of the Townshend Acts. The Daughters of Liberty was a group of 92 women who looked to rebel against British taxes by making home goods instead of buying them from the British. Using their skills of the time, they made homespun cloth and other goods. To call attention to this effort, they would hold spinning contests in the village squares. These contests were called "spinning bees" and were widely attended by women and often men as well. Their name was inspired by the Sons of Liberty, who were established shortly before the Daughters

The Sons of Liberty was the name given to a group of patriots who worked underground to defend the rights of the colonists against the British government in the years before the American Revolution. They represented the ideals of liberty and justice, approving all the grievances and complaints of the colonists. Although the name was first used during the repeal of the Stamp Act in 1765, it continued to be stated to whenever colonists came together to fight new British laws, and especially taxes. The Sons of Liberty became an organization capable of getting people together to protest British impositions in a very effective manner. The slogan “No taxation without representation” was their official motto and the “tar and feathering” was

On December 16, 1773, “Mohawk” Indians boarded three boats docked at the harbor in Boston, Massachusetts, and proceeding in destroying countless amounts of tea. The “Mohawks” were truly the radical “Sons of Liberty”, disguised to conceal their identities. The “Mohawks” were protesting the Tea Act, in a extremely violent manner. The British were furious about the destruction of the tea, and requested the price of their wrongfully destroyed private property to be fully reimbursed by the colonies, while also demanding that the culprits of this needless destruction to be apprehended.

Through the violent acts that were sparked and initiated by the Sons of Liberty, they were indeed terrorists to the British. For example, the atrocious action of dumping the tea at Boston Harbor is considered “treasonous and punishable by death” due to deliberately disrupting the trade and economy of the British through revolt and violence. In addition, the Stamp Act caused the Sons of Liberty to aggressively revolt against the British nobility, and they continue to “confiscate, burn, and unpack” property, and furthermore, threatening the Royal Governor of New York Cadwallader Colden with violence and even death. Lastly, to emphasize political upheaval and propaganda, the Sons of Liberty promote their terrorism to coerce various individuals

The son’s of liberty were not terrorist but were patriot’s. If they had not fought back they would continue to be taxed and walked all over by Britain. They threw the tea in the Boston harbor because they were being taxed. And it caused the British to be threatened by this and tried to take out the rebels.

In my research paper, I will be discussing the Sons Of Liberty. My thesis is: if the Sons Of Liberty had not been created, no one would have helped the British with their taxation problems; therefore, the Bill Of Rights would have not been established. In this country known as America, many people live a free life. These people have the inalienable rights given at birth.

One man’s terrorist is another man's patriot. There are several reasons why I believe that the Sons of Liberty were fanatics. From tarring and feathering to vandalism I believe that the “heroes” we were led to believe are nothing but a bunch of fanatics and criminals.

Americans had begun to resent and oppose to this decision, not because they didn’t want to house the soldiers but because the colonists had been taxed. Taxed to pay for provisions and barracks for the army. The Sons of Liberty derived from a 1765 debate in the parliament over the stamp acts. Irishman and member of the parliament, Isaac Barré had defended the American colonists when Charles Townshend had made a disapproving comment towards the American colonists. Isaac had been reprimanded for defending the American colonists and for calling them the Sons of Liberty.