Essay about Sony and Matshisuta

were still slapped with a high profit margin, resulting in overpriced products compared to local Chinese products.

Japan is the home to of the top companies in the world. One of the companies, which has helped Japan’s economy to be one of the top, is Sony. Modern day Sony is a high profit high output company, which is manly due to its marketing strategies and decision to its customers.

Sony Corporation is a Japanese owned company, created in 1946 based in Tokyo, Japan. The company competes in the technology market with diversity. This includes video games, computers and computer hardware, television, media players, etc. With that being said, Sony has had their ups and downs over the past few years, just like everyone else in this industry. Things such as the U.S. economy can really affect the future of this company. Now that the economy is on the downfall, things such as entertainment are not as important as paying for food, gas, and other bills. It is important to realize these things as you analyze the company due to the fact that the company

Some might question why the employees of Toshiba did not come forward and say anything about the new and impossible “challenges” they were being required to meet. This question is easily answered when one looks into the organizational culture of Toshiba and Japan’s work culture. As explained in J. Boyd’s article, one of their strongest employee’s values is “loyalty to the

Sony is one of the leading if not leading technology Corporation within the technical business world today. This organization headquarters can be found in Tokyo, Japan. Sony business is focus on electronics, entertainment, and gaming systems, and it also has a financial service sector. The Sony organization mainly focus on electronics such as video games, and TV networking. With these elements it makes Sony a premier organization that

Dorchester, Inc is a U.S based conglomerate and has the intentions of expanding its operation to international levels. Recently there has been a trend by its competitors to expand their operations internationally as well. This is the prompter to the decision by the management of Dorchester, Inc to follow their competitors' trend and venture into the new and emerging markets globally as a long term business strategy. Through this international expansion Dorchester, Inc. hopes to gain a competitive advantage over its competitors. The particular area of expansion targeted by Dorchester, Inc is consumer electronics. The conglomerate has indicated their interest in purchasing companies that specialize in consumer electronics in three countries that identified herein (Prodi, 2010).

This is relevant in the case of Ford Motor Company, an American car manufacturer. In 2016, Ford was unable to compete in the Japanese market and was forced to exit due to

Semicontronics is an Australian manufacturing company that has been in the business of semi manufactured electronics for over a decade. Semicontronics has a solid reputation for meeting customer demands for quality products on time and on budget. The majority of Semicontronics customers are international, mid-market manufacturing companies that produce generic electronics such as cell phones, digital media players and game consoles. Retail stores in foreign countries purchase the generic products and rebrand them for sale.

Matsushita did this by closing its fax machine factory in Germany, and closing its microwave oven subsidiary and air-compressor factory in the U.S. Matsushita also asked for more than 10,000 Japanese employees in its manufacturing sector to retire early and all of these closed businesses and cancelled job positions were moved to China. Matsushita’s establishing of the new “brain” in China, or Matsushita Electric R&D Center in Beijing, China, was the company’s second largest of 16 R&D centers around the world. Matsushita’s chairman, Yoichi Morishita said “it was too difficult to explain everything about China to Japanese designers; to really make use of China’s special competitive advantages and to really meet Chinese customers’ demands, Matsushita decided to hand over its China-related development and research issues to local researchers and engineers.” Matsushita decided to localize material supplies and use as many Chinese suppliers as possible for its operations in China because there are several material distribution and trade centers in China that provide steel, paint, hardware, etc. all functioning with a mechanism similar to that of the polystyrene distribution and trade centers. The fourth fundamental change in Matsushita’s new supply chain, Stretch the distribution link, Matsushita selected TCL, the largest TV producer in China, as its strategic partner to stretch its supply chain to Chinese rural and inland markets. With

Royal Philips NV and Matsushita (owner of the Panasonic brand among others) are two of the world’s biggest electronics multinationals. After successfully building their global empires in the early twentieth century, they have both suffered financially in recent decades. It is therefore interesting to look at why this has happened and what their future prospects are.

Lenovo Group Ltd. (Lenovo) is a Chinese multinational technology corporation that founded in Beijing in 1984. Specifically, Lenovo is one of the top enterprises that produces and sells consumer electronics and computer hardware, with a focus on producing personal computer (PC). Currently, the headquarter of Lenovo is in Beijing, China, with a second headquarter that located in Morrisville, North Carolina, United States. As a multinational enterprise, Lenovo currently have operations in more than sixty countries and has its products sold almost all over the world.1 Becoming a multinational enterprise especially making it to the top of the industry is not an easy thing for any company due to numerous predictable and unforeseen challenges. However, Lenovo has successfully expanded its business and reached to the top. Therefore, the present paper aims to analyze Lenovo’s operational/managerial strategies and provide a better sense of what has Lenovo done for reaching to the current position in the global market.

Hirai has made Sony’s strategic development process somewhat deliberate. He has laid out how he wants to see Sony change. Sony is teetering on the edge of the deliberate side on the pendulum of organisational context. Moreover, Hirai believes that Sony are in a relatively stable environment, or at least, understand the direction which the environment is headed. Moreover, Sony does consistently show glimmers of a potentially emergent side. They are open to adaptation and change, but remain to plan in a deliberate method.

In contrast to Philips, Matsushita’s success stems from highly efficient and centralized operations. Also unlike Philips, Matsushita’s numerous domestic retail outlets in Japan are ideal for the sale and distribution of their products and provide valuable market research opportunities and capabilities. Both the structure and culture at Matsushita encourage an entrepreneurial drive in their employees and divisions, as they compete for funds to develop new products, and extraordinary communication exists between the international operations and the home office in Japan.

Sony has a strong reputation on the domain of digital and audio technology. However, Sony was a marginal player in the handset industry with 2% of market share. Previous attempts to enter the US and European markets both failed due to poor knowledge on mobile technology. Sony was too slow to move away from its traditional businesses such as music stereos, televisions, VCR and DVD, hence a partner who could provide expertise knowledge was needed.

However, TaiSource shows that they want the market too. If they do so in the near future, USTech will be in a crisis. To avoid the potential threat, US Tech should consider cooperating with a Chinese supplier as an alternative. Another aspect is about Chinese policy, it’s complex, changeable and kind of lean the balance to domestic enterprises. Although TaiSource currently hold the mainland resources and relationships, to have USTech’s own Chinese suppliers could better ease the burden of policy issues and polices to the business if USTech want to explore and expand Chinese market.