Sor Juana Jessica Jones Analysis

In the essay of Judith Ortiz "The Myth of the Latin Women: I Just Met a Girl Named Maria" was an essay I believe many students were able to relate, understand, and reflect with the arguments she pointed out. Judith Ortiz seemed passionate in her essay because it was a narrative of a situation she went through. While reading Judith 's essay it was easy to comprehend what she was trying to make her audience understand. Judith 's tone throughout the essay was form, reflective, and informative. The imagery she gives us in her essay when talking to about Latin women made easy for students to image

Throughout American Literature, women have been depicted in many different ways. The portrayal of women in American Literature is often influenced by an author's personal experience or a frequent societal stereotype of women and their position. Often times, male authors interpret society’s views of women in a completely different nature than a female author would. While F. Scott Fitzgerald may represent his main female character as a victim in the 1920’s, Zora Neale Hurston portrays hers as a strong, free-spirited, and independent woman only a decade later in the 1930’s.

The first of paragraph of The Myth of the Latin Women draws you in with anger but also a sense of embarrassment. Cofer buts up with antics for the name of comedy and is expected to take it well, for the mere fact that she is Puerto Rican. As a person as latin descent, the stereotyping and frustration draws me from a deeper standpoint. Her anger is justified and pushes for understanding for all those perpetrating. Her life is filled with anecdotes of people assuming that they can treat her a certain way because of the island her culture came from or the stereotypes portrayed in West Side Story. She uses sarcasm when she says “If you are a Latina, especially one like me who so obviously belongs to Rita Moreno's gene pool, the Island travels with you.” She is telling the world she is not Maria but an independent brain that is more than the oversexulatization of her background or the pigment of her skin.

Teresa of Avila can be known as an autobiography of Teresa de Cepeda y Ahumada, or even as Teresa refers to her piece as a confession. Throughout this historical, religious confession, Dr. Raquel Trillia pointed out throughout her lecture how Teresa used strategies that many women must use in order to be viewed as a writer. These strategies are used so that a woman’s writing will be accepted, or at the most respected within the literature society. With that being said, the main theme brought forth during Dr. Raquel Trillia’s lecture about Teresa of Avila is how much women are struggling to be a part of the literature community and to be graced with respect from other (male) authors within the novel industry.

Douglas’ humorous and well informed way of writing really inspired me. From examples of magazines, media, television shows, films, retail, and even in music she described and compared to us what is going on among these examples and how real women today are really living their lives. Douglas presents an analysis of how women are presented to the public and how we continue to be treated as inferior to men despite the strides of feminism. After reading this book, I even find myself reading or watching something and pretty much look to see if it is women friendly or not. This is something I really never done before until now. This book definitely got me to think about feminism and the role it plays in my life.

In this poem Cisneros displays a common stereotype of women in a satirical way that is easy to identify with, and in a sense empowers women rather than degrading them. In doing this, she keeps her cultural heritage by using both English, and her own native language, Spanish to define her views. She maintains this sort of style throughout her poems and pursues gender issues and cultural identity with ferocious vitality and purpose.

Reading literature, at first, might seem like simple stories. However, in works like William Faulkner's “A Rose for Emily,” Katherine Mansfield's “Miss Brill,” and Kate Chopin's “The Storm,” the female protagonists are examples of how society has oppressive expectations of them simply because of their gender.

The new Netflix series Jessica Jones, which becomes available on November 20, is a marvel—legally (it's produced by Marvel), creatively and, it must be said, surprisingly.

Throughout history, it has generally been accepted that women are of a lesser standard than that of their male counterparts. There has always been an opposition to this theory that believes that the reverse is true, or at the very least, that the sexes are equal. While some authors place women within their works solely as a filler character, or as support of their male lead, there are some that have written with the intent of the females offering a distinctive viewpoint than that of what the readers might be used to. The roles of women in literature have never been forced to be monotonous, yet that’s how they’ve been perceived. However, there are examples of female characters who have been written with the express purpose of breaking that

There are many factors that have contributed to the change the way women are portrayed in novels over time, which I will also

Literature reflects many aspects of human ideas, beliefs, and societies. It does not only enlighten readers, but it broadens their perspective by exposing them to large human questions that have troubled humanity for centuries. The readings exposed complex topics such as feminism during the 19th century and how women carry the same stigma until today. The Dolls House by Henrik Ibsen and The Yellow Paper by Charlotte Perkins Gilman made me think about my place in the world as a woman, and the significance of the movement to end sexist oppression. Literature gives the reader a chance to inhabit characters and make them feel connected to the author and the author’s work.

Samuel Hunt: Both Doris Lessing’s “On Not Winning a Nobel Prize” (2007) and Margaret Atwood’s “Spotty-Handed Villainesses” (1994) are speeches which demonstrate a great strength of textual integrity, achieved through the speakers personal styles of presentation and the relevance of the issues at hand, holding value beyond the contextual audience and towards a modern responder. The enduring value of any speech is the ability to persuade with conviction, utilising both the arousal of the audience’s emotions to address topics of significance and the qualities of an effective rhetorician. While Lessing’s speech is directed at the issue of world poverty with a focus of education, Atwood’s speech draws attention to gender inequality throughout literature.

Characterization is perhaps the most vital aspect within a work of literature. It takes mere words on paper and brings them to life, transforming these same words into walking, talking characters who exist in their own written world. However, throughout the history of literature, as well as any forms of media, women have been marginalized. Women are subject to a lack of characterization and/or typical female tropes, suggesting that they cannot progress mentally, reach their own realizations, as well as have their own identities. In addition, women are commonly showcased as flat characters, fulfilling typical gender roles and only serving to progress the plot for more dominant male characters.

In her poems and familiar letters, Franco defends both herself and women as a whole by challenging traditional patriarchal gender constructs, educating and disarming the insults of male attackers, and appealing

I liked how you said "judging books by their cover” because I think society and people in general do this everyday and don’t realize it until after the fact, but its wrong. The man could not see how beautiful the woman really was because of how obsessed he was with making her fit his perfecfection standards; in reality the woman was already perfect the man was just to selfish to realize. The interperation I made of "Rappaccini's daughter" was a bit different than yours. I made the analysis that the father was posisioning the daughter out to achieve perfection. However, I did enjoy reading yours and became open to other possibilities. Good job.