Soul Theory Paper

Identity criteria are a main component of who a person actually is, central elements of how someone sees who they are and essential properties are urged to determine a person’s identity. How philosophers view the soul is essential one’s personality. The duelists believe that wherever the soul goes, that’s where the mind goes. The dualists view is based off of the fact that there is more to our brain and ourselves than just the physical aspect, the soul strongly supports this claim. Materialism argues against the duelists because they only believe in the physical component of the world, in their eyes a soul does not exist. Lastly, in the psychological view, John Locke implemented memory into personal identity. Leibniz and Reid challenged Locke’s ideas and came up with a reasonable conclusion. Personal identity can be defined is through identity theft, but it is the central elements of how someone perceives themselves to determine who they actually are. “One is that a single soul, one and the same, has been with this body I call mine since it was born. The other is that one soul was associated with it until five years ago and then another, psychologically similar, inheriting all the old memories and beliefs, took over. A third hypothesis is that every five years a new soul takes over. A fourth is that every five minutes a new soul takes over” Weirob views souls by being able to move from one body to the next without us knowing, the duelists strongly disagree with this theory.

Unfortunately, the search for such a new identity all too often proves to be a painful and fruitless odyssey. Yet like the water that's always attracted by gravity, the human soul is constantly and relentlessly evolving—along with the world around it. Thus in the end, we often are left only with ourselves rather than labels and concepts.

The idea of the soul varies widely in religious tradition. While these variations exist, its basic definition is unvarying. The soul can be described as the ultimate internal principle by which we think, feel, and will, and by which our bodies are animated. The soul is seen as the core principle of life or as the essence of a being 1. Views on the permanence of the soul vary throughout religious tradition as well. While some view it as a mortal entity in flux others believe the soul is an immortal and permanent unit. These interpretations vary from time period to time period and between religions. These characteristics of the soul are interpreted differently through an Eastern or

Some philosophers argue that the mind is private, whereas the body is not. Any person may know the state of my body, but no person, including even possibly myself, can truly know the state of my mind. The Third edition of “Ultimate Questions; Thinking About Philosophy” by Nils Ch. Rauhut states, “We can never be sure we are dealing with the same person because we have no way to check if they continue to have the same soul, because we cannot physically experience the soul. These skepticisms can apply to ourselves because we cannot verify we have the same soul as yesterday.” This is accurate, but the issue here is whether we need to check if we have the same souls as yesterday or not. If one acted and talked the same as they did the day before

In philosophy, “soul is the immaterial aspect or essence of a human being that which confers individuality and humanity, often considered to be synonymous with the mind or the self” (Encyclopædia Britannica). As it means, the soul is persistent during the time even though the body has changed physically and mentally. Base on my religion, I believe everyone has his or her own soul, and that soul I can call a spirit which is the immaterial thing going along with us until our body is dead. Then it will reach to whether the hell or the heaven. Therefore, soul is related to someone's beliefs rather than a fact, but it can be a connection to link my future me to my present me because we both have a same soul, and that tie both us together as

Self-identity is singular. The belief in this existence of one’s self, presupposes all our experiences of consciousness. We all hold that this identity is ours alone. I speak of my experiences as experienced by me. I would seem to be talking nonsense , if I referred to myself in the plural or spoke of how the multiplicity of ‘me’s’ experienced an event. Although most will submit to the existence of levels of consciousness, we categorize those people who exhibit distinct personalities as non-ordinary. All popular theories of self-identity set about the task of proving a singular self. I will attempt to analyze the currently held theories of self-identity, and consider cases where the singular self-identity of normal individuals is called

"I believe that if we are honest with ourselves, that the most fascinating problem in the world is 'Who am I?' What do you mean? What do you feel when you say the word 'I, myself'? I don’t think there can be an anymore fascinating preoccupation than that because it is so mysterious. It is so elusive. Because what you are in your inmost being escapes your examination in rather the same way you can’t look into your own eyes without a mirror, you can’t bite your own teeth, you can’t taste your own tongue and you can’t touch the end of one finger with the same finger. That is why there is always an element of profound mystery in the problem of who we are." This was said by Alan Watts, a British philosopher who specialized in spiritual and social identity.

Just as life and death complement each other, the self is comprised in similar respects. Humans are typically characterized as having a consciousness, which consists of thoughts and memories, and a body. For a person to no longer possess a distinct self, a change in consciousness or to the body would have to occur. Diseases, for example, that affect the brain’s functions, including memory loss and abnormal thoughts, can interrupt a person’s everyday activities; in addition, a person suffering from a mental disease has difficulties identifying himself or herself thus suggesting the person is a changed self. Further, people with alterations to the body can be perceived as a new self from friends and family who no longer identify the family member or friend as the same person because of the physical change to his or her body. For this reason, a change in consciousness and to the body changes the uniqueness of an individual and, therefore, results in a changed self.

When we tackle the question of 'What makes us the individual persons that we are?', one approach that we can take is to seek an answer to the question of what it is that is required for a person to continue to exist over time. If we could agree on what is required for it to be true that you continued to exist, then we would have good grounds to believe that we had discovered what makes someone the particular person they are, and by extension, what makes any person the person they are. In essence, what we are searching for are the necessary and sufficient conditions for personal identity over time.

We live and die with work. Endless hours at a computers, meetings, memos - all of this require us to be efficient and punctual. We are harnessed and trained to produce. But the soul knows nothing about deadlines and it shouldn't be harnessed. When we find ourselves slowly becoming unhappy and can't really point a finger at why that is, we need to listen to our souls. It is able to think on the concept of happiness and it can tell us amazing truths and revelations.

Someone who believes and views human nature in that the soul is the unifying principle is said to be holomorphic. One of those philosophers is Thomas Aquinas. In Aquinas’ argument, he states that the soul is part of the body and that it requires it in its everyday needs. The premise that he sets forth is “Since the soul is united to the body as its form, it must necessarily be in the whole body, and in each part thereof.” The soul is the function that drives the body to move and think. Without it, the body is nothing and is not simply just a motor that chugs at every breath that a human takes. It is not to be considered just a mechanical factor. The soul is a special force that coincides with the body. As he states “the soul is united to the body” thus, the body would become a lifeless entity without it. This conveys the notion of how the soul is everything, mind and body. He expresses that “the soul is a substantial form” emphasizing that it is ideal to the body. His conclusion came to be that “Therefore, on the withdrawal of the soul, as we do not speak of an animal or manliness equivocally (as we speak of a painted animal or stone animal), so it is with the hand, the eye the flesh and bones... [that] no part of the body retains its proper action.” This shows how the body will become lifeless and dull. Therefore, the soul helps the body to function the way it is. If one component ceases to exist, the other will follow after it.

The concept of the soul is that our soul is the essence of the body and was created by God. Our soul is

The soul is a little harder to understand. The soul is the “spirit” part of a person. It is the part of a human that never dies; the soul is what will eventually end up in Heaven or Hell. The soul cannot be seen or touched, and it will never atrophy away. Webster defines the soul as the “actuating cause of an individual life” (Webster 1123) It is what makes each person a person. Personalities, emotions, and mental activity are all stored in the soul, and there is also a place for God. Without God filling part of the soul, a person will feel “empty,” and the person will also end up in Hell if he dies “empty.” People can fill this “emptiness” with Jesus Christ – God’s Son – and they will be complete and be free from the eternal torment of Hell.

In Philosophy, the soul is an essential aspect of being a human being. Not only is it an defining essence of human beings but also animals, plants, and all living things. The soul, also referred to as the psyche, has been the topic of philosophical, scientific, and religious inquiries for thousands of years. Through their texts, three influential philosophers, Plato, Aristotle, and Augustine, shared their views on the soul and what they perceive it to be. Throughout this examination of their findings, the reader will better understand what the soul is, in respect to these philosophers perspectives.

Some people know how to explain easily and clearly what happens inside our body. Others are good to talk to about how our mind works. And others know what happens to our Soul. When your mind merges with your spirit and your body, everything is transformed. Your mind and body raises to a very high level of vibration. From this moment, your Self lives inside you, through what you choose to experience as a human being.