Sowing Weapons Of War Essay

Military defense contractors like Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Raytheon, General Dynamics, and the lesser known United Technologies Corporation take a tremendous amount of criticism for their supposed contribution to military conflicts. This is of course an understandable sentiment for people to have regarding these companies. These arms manufacturers traffic in military grade weaponry to various countries that can then go on to use this equipment to do harm. United Technologies Corporation, the obvious subject of this paper, has recently faced harsh criticism, and even legal ramifications, for selling military equipment on the Asian market. The reasoning behind this criticism comes from the fact that selling arms to these Asian nations could

War is the fuel that ignites chaos, death and destruction throughout the world. Novelist Michael Marshall wisely stated in his book Blood of Angels, “There has been no war without atrocity. War is atrocity, pure and simple: only greed, nationalism and faith help us pretend otherwise.” The quotes anti-war stance accurately details wars horrific nature and the unjust circumstances endured by the innocent. Furthermore, it reflects on the idea that patriotism blinds people and significantly contributes to men feeling obliged to join the fight. Finally, it refers to the lust for power and wealth that particular countries possess and how it drives them to make barbaric decisions.

The United States has been a major supplier of arms to foreign buyers for the better part of the last 75 years. Major military exports beginning under the Lend-Lease Act, Robert M Gates reports in his Foreign Policy piece “Helping Others Defend Themselves”, led the United States to continue supplying weapons to nations that would pay for them in lieu of retreating back into the isolationist policies put forth on the heels of World War I (Gates). Today, America is the largest arms exporter by a wide margin. Per Amnesty International, between 2010 and 2015 the United States facilitated upwards of $55 billion worth of conventional arms sales (“Killer Facts: the scale of the global arms trade”). While a significant portion of the United States’s

One important moral implication, effecting how we address the question of civilian casualties, has to do with weapons that are inherently indiscriminate. It is widely accepted that not only is their use in war morally prohibited, but their mere possession as well is looked at as immoral.

Most of us know that ethics are the norms that determine between right and wrong. We learn these norms from the day we born and we use them on a daily basis. Ethical norms start from families, kindergarden, school, and work. They are different in religions, in cultures, in societies, and in different countries, but in their roots, they are the same. The laws copied from ethics are natural laws. During war we kill and torture people which is considered to be unethical but, there are some issues that we accept things which we don’t have to. War has always been and will continue to be a necessary action executed by human beings. There are many reasons for wars such as territorial issues, religion factors, and ethnic factors. And when the disagreements between two parties cannot be solved in a peaceful way, the war is the last option to be conducted. For this reason, the Geneva Convention sets international standards and laws which are a protection for humanity in other circumstances. “Professionals are guided by their ethics: the set of principles by which they practice, in the right way, on behalf of those they serve - demonstrating their characters” (General Raymond T. Odierno 2014). The importance of military ethics in 21st century is very valuable. In order to find out the importance, moral within ethics, ethical challenges and ethical categories with examples will be discussed.

In this essay I will illustrate the challenges of the weapons mass destruction to the united states, then how the United States implement its instruments of power to face the security challenge through the liberalism policy.

For many, the first thing that comes to mind when thinking of the word “war” is a cause, moreover fighting for beliefs or ethics that radically differ from the opposing side’s. However, a more universal similarity between wars, fiction or nonfiction, is economic gain. In 1984, The Eyre Affair, and Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows, the antagonist has the same motivation for the same action; each aim to start a major war in order to sell weapons that they produce, earning a substantial profit for the world’s distress.

Paul Jefferson, an early humanitarian deminer once said: “a landmine is the perfect soldier: Ever courageous, never sleeps, never misses” (Khamis par. 1). Jefferson’s quote can be interpreted in two ways: that a landmine is a great weapon and all countries should use it, or that a landmine is too dangerous for one’s own good. For years, landmines have been affordable, yet dangerous killers that countries use to defend their borders in war. But as wars end, countries often forget about their rural parts and the destruction left from war, leaving citizens in the danger from landmines. The immoral and unethical use of landmines in West Africa will continue to create an impoverished and uneconomic society for thousands of innocent people due to

Reading from the three essays: “from The Art of War” by Sun Tzu, “from The Prince” by Niccola Machiavelli, and “Warfare: An Invention” by Margaret Mead, all have same but different perspectives. The three readings all revolve around war, violence and aggression. Reading these three essays can give a different perspective on warfare. The ways of the three components in these readings, war, violence and aggression and the way the human body works as to how people work, is amazing. The authors show war, violence and aggression through these pieces to compare and contrast their ideas and moral of warfare.

1. When reading this work my initial impression is that the world has gone into a time that extraterrestrial beings have decided to destroy earth and humanity has been fighting back.

Naive citizens are enduring the pain from “incendiary weapons,” which has led to a lifetime of either physical or mental problem. Vatican City advocated that the Protocol III of the Convention on Conventional Weapons needs to be reinforced to executing the use of these weapons.

Since the last century, in 90s, Victor Butt was known as the world's most prolific arms dealer, who provided weapons for the conflicts around the world, including in Afghanistan, Rwanda and Sultan. Due to this, the wars are expanding and intensifying in these countries. As a matter of truth, it is generally agreed that all countries have the right to access to conventional weapons of self-defense and internal law enforcement. Nevertheless, a portion of small weapons can be traded for the sake of illegal purposes, which tend to pose a security threat potentially. As a growing number of gun events resulting from the plentifully illegal arms, the public has paid a lot attention to that whether to avoid these

As the result of seven years of negotiations, the Arms Trade Treaty is the first global establishment to enforce common international standards that must be met before States may authorize transfers of conventional weapons or may export ammunition and weapons parts and components (Kimball). It was the first time in world history that a global agreement restricting the transfer of conventional weapons has been approved by majority of the States. The process had become an extremely rapid movement towards making this treaty operational. The question now is will this Treaty actually work and will it solve the problems that it was created for?

Technology in the light of military weaponry has been one of the growingly controversial issues that the world faces today. Among the top weapon types that have advanced greatly over the past recent years are nuclear, chemical and biological weaponry. Though the United States government and military has been enthusiastically involved in the evolution of these weapons, their enthusiasm dwindles when responsibility must be taken for the consequences that result. Consequences that are left unresolved or postponed only bring about more doubts and questions that all branch off of one basic issue: Is it ethical to continue the advancement of nuclear, chemical and biological warfare when the results cannot be

For example, “the British arms manufacturer, BAE Systems, was being investigated for bribing Saudi officials into buy fighter planes, but the government intervened in the investigation citing national interests.” (Shah, Corruption) The involvement of the government is not a particularly new concept, seeing that many governments and armament firms work together to achieve profit goals and complete geopolitical agendas. For instance, Anup Shah studied that after the 1991 Persian Gulf crisis, the United States agreed to sell 80 advanced F16s to the United Arab Emirates. In return, the US was to be able to build military bases in the area with access to the only deep-water port capable of storing carriers in the Persian Gulf. Companies and governments export arms to many regions around the world; however, these places sometimes include war torn countries and brutal regimes. It was in the year 2000 “that U.S. contracts accounted for 49.7% of global sales … and the U.S. controlled half of the developing world 's arms market with $12.6 billion in sales.” (Stanton, Madsen) Companies end up selling to these areas of the world because “in order to make up for a lack of sales from domestic and traditional markets for military equipment, newer markets are being created or sought after.” (Shah, The Arms Trade is Big Business) To rid the industry of high rates of corruption and to stop companies from making secret deals with governments, the ATT needs to be better enforced amongst