The effectives of spanking grows stronger as a child gets older. In children around the ages of 6-12 will end up losing respect for the parent. Listening skills will diminish and they will become disobedient. You will be unable to properly rationalize with your child and communicate adequately. According to Rob Waters, “Spanking teaches your child that violence is an acceptable way to solve problems”(Waters, R, n.d). Studies have shown that a child is more likely to be violent if they are spanked at home. Spanking instructs a child that roughness is an adequate approach to tackle issues. Research demonstrates that children who are hit typically end up hitting other children as well. Also, different studies find that children who are hit are
Spanking has become an arguably debatable form of discipline. According to a study at the University of Texas, the more children are spanked, the more likely they are to defy their parents (“Spanking: Pros and Cons”). There is a connection between spanking during the childhood and mental health diagnoses later in life. There are other options of discipling your child than spanking them, especially because all children can take spanking differently. Parents should not spank their child because it showers that being “stronger” is right, demonstrates that older people have a right to hit younger people, and gives the examples that violence solves all problems.
Spanking has been the way of discipline for many years, but in reality it is child abuse. Spanking, also known as corporal punishment, to me is any kind of negative physical contact to a child with the intention to cause pain as a way of discipline. Anything from a pat on the butt, to the use of a belt or paddle on a child, or a smack on the hand or mouth can be considered spanking. Child abuse is violence, and "violence is an act carried out with the intention, or perceived intention, of causing physical pain or injury to another person" (Straus 7). The intentions of both spanking and violence are to cause pain and the only difference is that violence also covers acts of injury. So, are parents actually teaching their children
There is a valid argument held by individuals who think that we should keep the disciplinary action of spanking around. There is a verse in the Bible that deals with parents disciplining their children, which can be broken down into two parts. The first part states that if parents spare the rod, the second part will subsequently occur. The second part states if parents are to let the first part happen then they are spoiling their child. Many Christian families view this as the go ahead to spank their children, in order to not spoil them.
Spanking or inflicting a child may cause aggression in children. Spanking at the ages 10 months and 5 years is common in 70% of American family’s although according some researchers that corporal punishment can affect the ability to function and acceptance of values. Spanking at an early age can do more harm than good. Studies show that children who gets spanked are more likely to get violent in adult hood. Most children develop between the age of 3 months and 5 years old if corporal punishment action is used it can make the child less aware and can cause problem in education for teachers and authority.
It is often argued that spanking children will lead to the kid having socialization problems, affecting child’s behavior and functioning. People think the results of spanking will lead to “...having problems with learning and memory because of the functioning process”. Or maybe the memories of being punished will affect the child negatively, and turn into being isolated to themselves, not being very sociable, or having poor performances in school.
I believe that kids should not get spank. For example, if you spank the kids they will not listen to you they will think that you are mean person. So I think you should punish the kids by taking their phones, games, and laptop, anything they like they will feel bored and realize they did something bad and they will not do again. For instance, when I was around the age of twelve I didn’t use to listen to my mom so she will spank me I used cry and go to my room not talk to anyone. My mom use to hate when I don’t talk to her she feel bad so the more I get older when don’t spank me she just talking me if I do something wrong . I believe that kids will stop behavior when you take their favor
Many people have different methods of punishing a child. however, some methods, such as spanking, are unreasonable. Have you ever thought of the outcome of spanking a child? The long term effects? Child spanking can cause many more issues than the ones it supposedly fixes. Parents should refrain from spanking a child due to the fact that it can have many negative effects such as psychological, behavioral, and even ones that lead on to adulthood.
The first claim this popular article makes is that kids who are spanked are less emotionally healthy than those who aren’t and that kids who were spanked tend to behave worse as time progresses. “What if we were spanked when we were young and turned out fine?”, studies apparently show that you would be emotionally healthier if you weren’t. A study performed by MacKenzie et al., (2015) show that spanking at ages early as the age of nine showed negative consequences through the age of nine into young adulthood. This means that with factors controlled most people who have been physically punished from an early age will demonstrate a suboptimal social behavior compared to their
A recent study shows 70 percent of parents believe it is right to discipline a child through physical means. Most commonly, parents will spank their children but being hit with things like belts or other objects happens as well. Parenting methods haven’t changed much with time and discipline in similar no matter the country. With more studies out to find the most effective method of parenting and discipline it’s coming to attention whether or not physical harm is the best way to teach children. Parents want what is best for their children, so it is important to constantly bring up and question methods commonly accepted in the past. One method that is becoming more controversial is spanking children. Though it is still considered normal to do, it is gaining more traction and more studies are being done to find the problems it causes. Checking on parenting methods can be difficult as everyone is raised differently. It is also difficult to test which forms of punishment lead to certain outcomes. However, there is a trend of negative effects from hitting. Gershoff acknowledges, “several national professional organizations have called on parents to abandon spanking as a child rearing practice and for professionals to recommend disciplinary alternatives to spanking.” Spanking children is a terrible discipline method as it has negative effects.
The term corporal punishment means the intentional infliction of pain on the body for purposes of punishment. "Spanking can be defined as the use of physical force aimed at causing children to experience pain but not injury, for the purposes of correction and control of youthful behavior"(http://www.123helpme.com/preview.asp?id=32539). Spanking is a controversial topic and should not be taken lightly.
Ponder this; you are a parent with only a seven year old child. Your child continues to perform an act that you told them to stop doing, because they have already done it three times before. You have had enough and decided to discipline your child in a way different from a stern discussion. You decide to spank your child. Would you consider the spanking a form of child discipline, or would you consider it child abuse? Are you expecting your child to learn from this disciplinary action, or are you spanking your child because you enjoy knowing that you are in control and that you quite possibly may be injuring your child?