Species range expansion is a global phenomenon (Holt 2003) driven primarily by factors such as climate change (Walther et al. 2009, Chen et al. 2011) and land use change (e.g. Dawe et al. 2014). Such events have resulted in the rapid emergence of several zoonotic diseases (Crowl et al. 2008, Engering et al. 2013) as pathogen, disease vector, or reservoir host species introduce disease into a previously naïve region (e.g. Legér et al. 2013, Fuller et al. 2012). Since the process of species range expansion always produces observable genetic signals, such as lower genetic diversity and greater genetic structuring among populations at range edges (Excoffier et al. 2009, Cristescu 2015)we can apply concepts from population genetic theories to identify …show more content…
2009, Institut National de Santé Publique du Quebec 2014), a phenomenon largely attributed to the to the range expansion of the Lyme disease vector, the black-legged tick (Ixodes scapularis (Say)) into the country (Ogden et al. 2008). The number of known and suspected established black-legged tick populations in Canada has increased substantially from one at Long Point, Ontario in the 1990s (Ogden et al. 2009), to the numerous populations now found across five Canadian provinces (Ogden et al. 2014). This rapid range expansion of black-legged tick has been credited to several factors, including climate change (Ogden et al. 2006) and shifting ranges of common black-legged tick hosts (Madhav et al. …show more content…
Variation in allele frequency through time will be the net result of colonizing and extinction processes in the population. In other words, while species abundance in the population may remain stable over time, genetic diversity may vary (Figure 1). For instance, we would expect populations at earlier stages of establishment to exhibit greater genetic turnover rate compared to populations that are well established (Figure 1). For the black-legged tick in southern Quebec, all populations regardless of establishment stage will likely be experiencing regular influxes of new genetic material from the introduction of new individuals. However, the relative amount of novel genetic material relative to that already present locally will differ depending on the establishment stage (Figure 1). For populations still undergoing recolonization-extinction cycles, the relative amounts of novel genetic material will likely be much greater compared to local genetic material due to high local mortality rates (Figure 1). In this case, we would expect to observe great amounts of genetic turnover over time, assuming that introduced individuals originated from multiple random source populations. Conversely, populations that are well established with a self-sustaining pool of local individuals would likely have enough local genetic material to mask the signal of any introduced material (Figure 1). Therefore,
Lyme disease is vector borne disease that is caused by the Borrelia burgdorferi bacteria. It is transmitted to humans by the nymphal stage of scapularis ticks (Levi et al, 2012). It is widespread in North America, and is often times discussed about in relation to deer population. While ticks use deer often as a reproductive host, this article discusses that deer are not the only factor that affect the prevalence of Lyme disease. Small mammals and predation play a major role in the emergence of this Lyme disease.
There are several different types of preventative measures currently underway for combating Lyme disease. Most Lyme disease cases are reported in the midwest and northeast regions of the United States. It is crucial that residents of those regions are properly educated on the disease and what they can do specifically to lower their risk of infection. Preventive foresight for residents of regions where Lyme disease is most common include dressing appropriately to prevent tick bites while in wooded rural areas. It is recommended that each resident of the owner invests in tick repellents and acaricides. It is vital that residents of areas prone to the disease do research and receive education on the disease as well as inform the people around
burgdorferi populations in the Mid-West and Northeast share a fairly recent common evolutionary ancestor despite geographic separation. The previous inference is supported by several contributing factors: both tick-borne populations of B. burgdorferi have very little genetic variation due to the minimal number of observed polymorphic sites present in each population, and both populations have similar linked allele combinations. More than likely, the above information suggests small population sizes and a recent common ancestor for both Northeast and Mid-Western populations of B. burgdorferi. However, Brisson et al. also noted that the independent populations have begun to minimally diverge from one another. The small evolutionary divergence between the two populations is not responsible for the higher rate of infection in the Northeast. Host populations in the Northeast encounter a different set of circumstances than hosts in the Mid-Western populations such as: host life-style and environmental factors, including closer proximity and different pathogen reservoirs, causing more frequent host-pathogen interactions, and thus a larger percentage of infected individuals in the Northeast than Mid-West
Ticks, they are most significant vectors of infectious diseases in the United States. These arachnids can host a scary medley of infectious bacterium, and they are increasing at an alarming rate with one CDC graph showing their numbers have almost tripled since 1995 (Lyme Stats). Some point to greater awareness, other point to climate change, while we don’t know exactly why their reach is growing we do know we have to be wary of the diseases they carry. While not all ticks are hosts, ticks carrying the Borrelia bacteria known for causing Lyme disease present a massive public health risk. Lyme is one most under researched Infectious diseases with the CDC estimating that somewhere between 300,000 and 3,000,000 people are infected annual.
One of the most common Tick communicable diseases plaguing the United States today is a human transferable infection called Lyme disease, which is spread by Deer Ticks Ixodes scapularis, they are small arthropods often found in wooded areas of eastern United states (Orkin.com “Deer ticks” accessed may 8 2016); transmission of the infection occurs when an contaminated deer tick I. scapularis bites its victim transmitting the blood borne infection to its host; a bacteria called spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi. (CDC) invades the body and begins it journey of destruction. Symptoms are not felt right away, yet over the
It is popular opinion that lowering the amount of deer in an area will lower the amount of adult deer ticks in that said area, thus lowering the incidence of Lyme disease. Like perennial grass weeds and problems, attacking the root of the concern best alleviates Lyme disease. The root is not the adult blacklegged deer tick known as Ixodes scapularis but the density of infected nymphal ticks, according to Ostfeld. In laboratory conditions, ticks experience high mortality rates in low humidity and high temperature settings. This led to the postulate that temperature plays a significant role in determining future densities of nymphal (smaller and sexually immature) ticks
Lyme disease is a rapidly spreading infectious disease in the United States, with over 25,000 confirmed cases in 2013.5 It was first discovered in the early-1970’s in the town of Lyme, Connecticut when a group of children started to present with rheumatoid arthritis symptoms. Some of these children presented with a rash and researchers connected the symptoms to occurring during peak tick season. By the mid-1970’s, the researchers began describing the symptoms and coining the term “Lyme disease” to help doctors diagnose the condition. The cause, however, was not discovered until 1981 by researchers at the Rocky Mountain Laboratories in Hamilton, Montana and finally the connection between deer ticks and Lyme disease was
The United States of America can be regarded as one of the most diverse and progressive countries in the world with people from all corners of the world contributing to the changing culture of the melting pot that is America. Despite this, our government inadequately represents our diverse population, specifically in Congress, with many officials being Christian, older, non-Hispanic white males dominating government.
It was hypothesized that the risk of Lyme disease and the quantity of infected blacklegged ticks is directly correlated to forest fragment
“Lyme disease is caused by the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi and is transmitted to humans by the bite of infected blacklegged ticks (Ixodes spp.). Early manifestations of infection include fever, headache, fatigue, and a characteristic skin rash called erythema migrans. Left untreated, late manifestations involving the joints, heart, and nervous system can occur. A Healthy People 2010 objective (14-8) is to reduce the annual incidence of Lyme disease to 9.7 new cases per 100,000 population in 10 reference states where the disease is endemic (Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Wisconsin). This report summarizes surveillance data for 64,382 Lyme disease cases reported to CDC during 2003-2005, of which 59,770 cases (93%) were reported from the 10 reference states. The average annual rate in these 10 reference states for the 3-year period (29.2 cases per 100,000 population) was approximately three times the Healthy People 2010 target. Persons living in Lyme disease--endemic areas can take steps to reduce their risk for infection, including daily self-examination for ticks, selective use of acaricides and tick repellents, use of landscaping practices that reduce tick populations in yards and play areas, and avoidance of tick-infested areas.” (U.S. National Library of Medicine, 2007.)
Lyme disease is typically caused by the spirochete bacterium Borrelia burgdorferi, but can also be caused by different strains of the Borrelia bacterium such as B. afzelii or B. garinii. It is a zoonotic pathogen that uses ticks as vectors. The bacteria uses its vector to multiply within and is transferred to the host’s blood through a bite that breaks the skin. The most common vector of the disease within the united States is the Ixodes scapularis, colloquially known as the blacklegged tick or the deer tick. They are not the only vectors though, as fleas, mosquitos, biting flies and the lone star tick have also been proven to carry and transmit this disease. Each of these vectors contracts the disease from a reservoir, which are all living
Introduction: This article tested the Dilution Effect model, which predicts that high species diversity in the community of tick host reduces vector infection prevalence by diluting the effects of the most competent disease reservoir, the white footed mouse. This study suggests that the preservation of vertebrate biodiversity and community composition can reduce the incidence of Lyme disease. The Dilution Effect hypothesis is decreasing infection prevalence in the tick population with increasing host diversity. The nymphal stage in the tick life stage is most likely to infect humans. The nymphal infection prevalence (NPI) was used as a measure of the disease risk to humans and to investigate the change as the diversity of the host community
Different species of Juglans have varying levels of resistance to both WTB colonization as well as colonization by the fungal pathogen Geosmithia. I propose to perform a genomics study on four species of walnut: Juglans major, Juglans microcarpa, Juglans regia and Juglans hindsii. J. regia will be used in the study since a SNP library has already been constructed for this species and it is arguably the most important species economically. J. hindsii is native to northern California and J. microcarpa is native to southwestern Texas. I would like to include these two species to understand how native walnuts respond disease and how their genomes differ from one another. J. major or
Global warming may increase the risk of some infectious diseases, like malaria, dengue fever, yellow fever, and encephalitis. These diseases are spread by mosquitoes and other insects, and could become more common if a rise in temperature allows those insects to live farther north. Also, the increase in rainfall that is likely to occur with an increase in global temperature would serve to help increase the reproduction of the vectors. In February 1999, Britain's Institute of Animal Health linked outbreaks of the lethal horse fever virus in Africa to the El Nino phenomenon. The warming and increase in rainfall in Africa caused by El Nino led to many more horses being bitten by infected vectors. The scientists said their research shows this pattern is likely to happen with other vector-borne diseases when global warming occurs. Increased temperatures could also reduce the gestation periods of disease vectors, which could aid the breeding of strains resistant to pesticides. Scientists also hypothesize that algae
During adoption, the parents sometimes get the choice of an open or closed adoption but not everyone gets the choice. “If we were offered a child and contact was involved and we didn’t want that, we’d have to consider another child, we couldn’t consider this one.” “No, not really, there was no choice. Well the way it was worded, I knew there would be some form of contact and that would be part of the deal. We didn’t have an option. If we’d said no, then I don’t think we would have got him.” (Smith and Logan 77) These are real situations that parents have come across with an adoption. Some parents feel an open adoption will arise complications in the future and try everything to get a closed adoption while some just agree with it so they can get the child they want. Contact with birth families can have both a positive and negative affect. In some cases, the adoptive parents agreed that the contact was likely to benefit the child, but some felt anxious about the emotional well being of the child, but they were afraid to use their voice because of the worries it will affect the child staying with them. Therefore, the parents give in only if its an open adoption and the visits can go well or can go bad and become awkward. “We were quite panicked to be honest. What are they going to think of us and what effect is it going to have on the children and it’s quite daunting going into that situation. But after the first meeting we were quite relieved when we came out not having met