Speech On Freedom Of Speech

The first amendment, the right of freedom of speech is one of the most important classic fantasy to almost anyone living in the United States, building the foundation of our nation. This right gives us plenty of different opportunities to express our opinions and political viewpoints on any issues in America. But it comes with a price, people have been protesting multiple different events trying to prevent people from expressing opposing opinions or political viewpoints on that has issues in America. For the minority of people, expressing a different opinion should be protected no matter how controversial or insensitive it may be.

Ah, the freedom of speech. Outlined in our nation’s Constitution and considered one of the most fundamental of all human rights, it gives us the ability to express ourselves without government interference, restraint, or suppression (“Freedom of Speech: An Overview”). Free speech is practiced by all types of American citizens, from the teenage girl posting a picture of a Starbucks cup on Instagram to the riled adult handing out fliers for a political cause. Every form of expression, ranging from the frivolous to the meaningful and the agreeable to the controversial, is protected by this significant and irreplaceable liberty. With this in mind, freedom of speech should surely be guaranteed in all corners of our nation.

Citizens of the United States are privileged to the freedom of speech under the First Amendment, but the constitutional limits of the freedom of speech have been questioned on multiple occasions. Citizens of the United States have called upon the Supreme Court numerous times to interpret the meaning of the First Amendment, and the court has censored some forms of speech such as obscene speech --which has been prohibited--and indecent or pornographic speech--which has been regulated (Barrett, 1999). Public and private properties, institutions, and businesses started censoring and placing limitations on hate speech in 1980 (Roleff, p.64). Hate speech is defined as speech that attacks a person or a group on the basis of attributes such as gender, ethnic origin, religion, race, disability, or sexual orientation (Barrett, 1999). “ In law, hate speech is any speech, gesture or conduct, writing, or display which is forbidden because it may incite violence or prejudicial action against or by a protected individual or group, or because it disparages or intimidates a protected individual or group” (Barnes and Ephross, 1994). Several debates have lingered over if certain restrictions on hate speech violate the First Amendment (Simmons, 2012). Hate speech should be regulated and censored by the federal government; however, these regulations and policies will limit an individual 's freedom of speech.

The right to freedom speech is one of the many great reasons America is one of if not the best country on this planet. America for ages has been a home for all and place where anyone can be themselves. However, what happens when these rights are tampered with and questioned? What happens when freedom of speech is no longer a guaranteed right? The supreme court case Island Trees School District v Pico dealt with a scenario where this right was essentially dissected. The Island Trees School District board made the claim that specific books amidst the school library were promoting anti american, anti-christian, anti-semitic, and just plain filthy ideological constructs. Dealing with a case such as this can be a rather tough decision. Each

There has been a recent rise in fervor to carve out sections of the first amendment to exclude the use of hate speech on college campuses. These limitations on free speech strike at the heart of law and justice within our society. To tolerate these restrictions sets dangerous precedents and unveils dangerous consequences. Speech codes that limit speech and expression beyond the limits of the first amendment are not justified because they harm society and the intellectual integrity of a university while failing to adequately support those students victimized by hate speech.

Freedom of speech serves to be a fundamental democratic right that affords every citizen participation in The United States constitutional democracy. It is a vital tool because it can be utilized by every person, rich, poor, black or white to voice their concerns and rejections of the federal or state government in hopes to bring about change. In addition, the first amendment allows for the free exchange of ideas, as it creates the moral imperative to challenge and oppose hateful ideas and celebrate ethical norms in our society. Also, the exchange of ideas generates compromise on key crucial issues to be accepted by the whole nation, as the trade of all opinions has been put on the table, and thoroughly debated to provide the best

In the United States of America, the first amendment on the United States Constitution guaranteeing that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. In December of 1966, a man named Clarence Brandenburg was sent was sent to prison and convicted but all he did was exercising his first amendment right to freedom of speech. In the summer of 1964 in Rural, Ohio, just north of Cincinnati, Clarence Brandenburg led a Ku Klux Klan rally and invites a Cincinnati news station to cover the event. The station agreed to it and started filming portions of the rally showing 12 men with hoods and robes and with some of whom carried firearms. Plus some shouting horrible ethic things plus they film them standing around a wooden cross and started burning it. Near the end of the rally, Brandenburg concluded the rally by saying a speech and portions of the speech were filmed live. He said, “"This is an organizers' meeting. We have had quite a few members here today, which are -- we have hundreds, hundreds of members throughout the State of Ohio. I can quote from a newspaper clipping from the Columbus, Ohio Dispatch, five weeks ago Sunday morning. The Klan has more members in the State of Ohio than does any other organization. We're not a revengent organization, but if our President, our Congress, our Supreme Court continues to suppress the white, Caucasian race, it’s possible that there might have to be some revengeance taken. We are marching on Congress July the Fourth, four hundred thousand strong. From there we dividing into two groups, one group to march on St. Augustine, Florida, the other group to march into Mississippi. Thank you.” After the new station aired the KKK rally, local authorities arrested Brandenburg for leading the rally and for it to be on the news. They charged him for breaking the Ohio Criminal Syndicalism Act. The act made illegal advocating “crime, sabotage, violence, or unlawful methods of terrorism as a means of accomplishing industrial or political forum,” as well as

It would have been inconceivable to the Founding Fathers that Americans would ever arrive to a point in time where large parts of American society would support limiting the freedom of speech against those who disagree with them. The right to free speech is so important that the entire First Amendment of the United States Constitution is dedicated to the right to free speech, giving Americans a responsibility to protect this right, even against those who they disagree with. Political events over the last several years has created an environment where those who spoke out against actions and policies of President Barak Obama were shut down as racist, with no consideration to the content of the argument to today where those who disagree with the loudest screamers are shut down as being Nazi’s, racists, and misogynists. The issue of freedom of speech is one that is of the utmost importance, but is one that is being eroded particularly on college campuses where it is no longer safe to have any opinion other than what those on the extreme left have. In the United States of America freedom of speech is a basic right afforded to all people, until college students and those on the left roll back their disdain for this core tenet of our nation, our culture, our way or life, and our freedoms are at risk.

Freedom of speech is the right to communicate one 's opinions and ideas. The term freedom of expression is sometimes used synonymously, but includes any act of seeking, receiving and imparting information or ideas, regardless of the medium used.

The founders of the United States government tried to protect our liberty by assuring a free press, to gather and publish information without being under control or power of another, in the First Amendment to the Constitution. We are not very protected by this guarantee, so we concern ourselves on account of special interest groups that are fighting to change the freedom of expression, the right to freely represent individual thoughts, feeling and views, in order to protect their families as well as others. These groups, religious or otherwise, believe that publishing unorthodox material is an abuse of free expression under the First Amendment. As we know, the Supreme Court plays an important role in the subject of free speech and

In theory, free speech should be easy. By principle, people should be able to say what they want, and basic courtesy should take care of making sure people aren’t being hurt unnecessarily. The more time you spend in the world, however, the more apparent it becomes that it really isn’t that simple. Many places exist in a comfortable bubble where a majority of people share a common overarching mindset, so issues with free speech—what you can and cannot communicate to others—come to the forefront in spaces where different cultures converge, as individuals have wildly different ideas of what is “okay” to say or do. This is where college campuses come in: most colleges are institutions that inherently attract young adults from all over the

Freedom of speech is the right of every American Citizen, it recognized in the First Amendment. It allows anybody to voice their opinion about what they see, feel, or believe to be true without censorship or restraint. Do people still use free speech or are they too afraid? Is our freedom of speech being censored because the topics are not socially accepted? Should there be regulations?

The First Amendment says: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press; or the right of the people to peaceably assemble and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. This freedom of speech clause as included in the First Amendment guarantees the citizens of America to express information and ideas freely. But is all form of speech free? On the most basic level, this clause allows for the expression of an opinion or idea without the fear of censorship by the government. It protects all forms of communication, with limits so you cannot always say anything you want, wherever you want, or whenever you want. Fighting words are not protected under the First Amendment, for instance, as are obscene expressions.

The riveting court case of Texas v Johnson challenges the limits of the First Amendment, particularly freedom of speech. The First Amendment states that, Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Texas vs Johnson revolves around the burning of the American flag, and deciding whether that constitutes as freedom of speech, or not. This essay will cover the background of the court case, followed by an explanation of why court cases such as these are important issues to examine. Next, two sides, one against the

The first amendment is one of the most controversial in all of the constitution. This is mainly due to the fact that its limits are open to interpretation. Freedom of speech, which is given under this amendment, is one of those that can be very easily infringed upon. The amendment protects what people say yet it has its boundaries; you can’t make terrorist threats, yell fire in a crowded theater, solicit bribes, intentionally inflict emotional distress on others or be obscene in public. In a way, the idea of freedom of speech in this country has never been absolute. Yet as we progress as a nation, the question shifts from “does it exist at all?”, to “what are the extents of it and when do you cross the