Speech On The Royal Family

I argue for Great Britain to still continue being a Constitutional monarchy. Why you may ask, Well I argue for them because it makes Great Britain running smoothly. If they change it may cause money problems and more. On page 29, it says "According to the rule of male primogeniture, a female could take the throne if there were no direct male heir to fill the seat. In 2013, with the queen's support, a new law was passed to end that rule. As a result, Great Britain may have even more queen in the future." That means Queen Elizabeth II believes that there are going to be queens in the future and I'm sure that nobody doesn't want to not be queen or king of England.

In 1588, Queen Elizabeth I of England uses the first person point of view to deliver a speech to her troops during an invasion from Spain. The purpose of this speech is to make the troops to have faith in wining the war. In order to achieve this purpose, Queen Elizabeth I uses diction and specific sentence structure in her speech.

In this assignment, I will closely analyse the speech made by Earl Spencer for the funeral of Lady Diana, considering the complicated context and literary devises he uses to affect his audience. The speech was written as a funeral speech for Diana's close family and friends, but also, more importantly, for the public, as it was broadcasted worldwide. In the speech, although it's primary purpose is to pay respects to his sister; he uses the opportunity to promote Diana's charity work, and to raise controversy within the royal family.

On August 31st 1997, two families bridged together through matrimony were suddenly broken by the death of Princess Diana. These two bloodlines, one of royalty and one of aristocracy, were forced to face the commonwealth with sadness; Speeches by The Queen and Diana’s brother, The Earl, were necessary. As multiple populations were grieving and reminiscing over the loss of such a popular public patron, many were growing irritable and suspicious of the tragic car accident and the lack of communication from The Queen. With pressures rising, the funeral approaching, and individuals still looking for someone to blame, Queen Elizabeth and Earl Spencer each delivered their own speech regarding the recent events. Despite the common topics and audience, it is evident how both speeches varied, especially concerning exigence, the use of rhetorical devices, and overall effectiveness

Let’s see what is Monarchy? It is a king or queen who gets all the powers of authority from inheritance and power stays in the same family, usually the bloodline from father to son. In Ancient Greeks, there weren’t too many monarchies, but there was some present and even Athens went under the monarchy at the end of the classical period which ended with the death of Alexander the Great. His father Phillip II of Macedon who became king after the deaths of his two brothers conquered Athens after the Peloponnesian war and ended democracy in the great city of Athens. (Wasson, 2014)

Monarchies have lasted in a society, because of the king taking order of the people. There is a lack of trust between a

“The power of the monarchs of Britain - which I'm taking to mean "of England, then Great Britain and then the United Kingdom" - has waxed and waned over the years.” as reviewed by quora.com

Queen Elizabeth I’s speech was called “Speech to the Troops at Tilbury”, written in 1588. She gave her speech in order to make her people fight against Spain, and to prevent them from invading the border of Britain. In her speech, she used pathos, words with strong connotation, and plain folk. She wanted to stop their enemies from invading her own country and if they would win, she would’ve offered rewards for the soldiers. She used pathos in the speech very well.

The movie The King’s Speech is about Prince Albert, Duke of York, who later becomes King George VI. The story focuses on the treatment of his speech impediment, a stammer, and the friendship he develops with his speech therapist, Lionel Logue. Throughout Prince Albert’s, or Bertie’s, treatment he unexpectedly finds himself on the throne. Bertie’s wife, Elizabeth, is another important character, who stands by his side through it all. It is a heartwarming story about friendship, loyalty, and trust. In this movie many interpersonal concepts are present, but three apparent and vital ones were perceptions, nonverbal messages, and relationship stages.

Generally over the years the Monarch’s role has slowly decreased as more jobs have been put on the PM’s.

Thanks for accepting the invite to my tree. In addition, I added you access to see living people (some family members unsure if dead or alive).

They get in charge from the bloodline. The longest they remain in charge is until they are dead because i don’t think they can quit. their laws are not made by the president their the king, queen, or empire when they get chosen then they get to make the laws and sometimes there laws don’t go well. They all aren’t treated equally they don’t have the same laws as democracy does. In the monarchy they really don’t have a voice because they really just pick who is able to be in charge of the country the countries there are Korea, and japan.

Hilary Mantel starts her speech by telling how she, last summer, was asked to name a famous person and choose a book to give them. She chose Kate, the Duchess of Cambridge, "a jointed doll on which certain rags are hung". This is a good way to start the speech because Hilary Mantel has now introduced her real purpose with the speech: to discuss the effect of monarchy.

Even as a princess, things are not perfect in my life. This is certainly true as of late. Things have been taking a turn for the worse, and I wonder if it can possibly bounce back before it is too late. I have been living this royal lifestyle for awhile now and it is elegant, but it has its twists; I feel like I am being used as a political pawn, and the plague is getting worse.

Diana has been named the Princess of Humanity for being so involved with her charity work.