Speech On The Rubber Tapper

In a country known for its elegant and flashy display of beautiful and wealth, there are groups of people, particular in the Amazon Rainforest, who still live detached from modernity and lifestyle of the contemporary world. Even though some of those groups live in voluntary isolation, they are united in their fight for land and environmental rights. One of these groups is the Kayapo, a group of around nine thousand indigenous people, who lives in the village of Gorotire along the Xingu River. Although the Kayapo have famously evolved from an isolated tribute to active voice against numerous developmental projects proposed by the Brazilian government, other groups such as rubber tappers in the Xapuri area have also made significant progress in securing political and cultural rights. While these communities and indigenous groups often share different cultures and customs, they are connected through a common struggle: defending their cultural and political identity amidst oppression and neglect from the Brazilian government.

Deforestation poses an alarming threat to Brazil’s Amazon rainforest, and it has been a serious concern for over 40 years. For thousands of years, the abundant, valuable resources in the Amazon were familiar only to the indigenous people of the region. In the 1500’s, before European colonization of Brazil, there were an estimated six to nine million individuals part of different cultures that made up a rich Amazonian society (“History”). Surrounded by the luxuriant rainforest and its natural resources, these indigenous tribes were able to thrive by utilizing the resources without destroying their habitat. After European emigration, the government of Brazil exploited the value of the Amazon’s resources in the twentieth century. In the 1970’s, the Brazilian government discovered the “untapped source of boundless potential” hiding in the Amazon and began using incentives to persuade settlers to develop its resources (Casey). Once economists realized the importance of the resources found within the rainforest, European pioneers set out to transform the Amazon into their home. By endorsing colonization, the government could not only boost the country’s economy, but also gain control over Brazil’s vast territory. The government supported migration to the rainforest and campaigned for the construction of infrastructure (“History”). In concurrence, the development of roads such as the Trans-Amazonian Highway, a 2,000 mile road built in 1972, granted people and machinery entrance to

Indigenous rights in Brazil have been very vague throughout the years and were difficult to obtain since many indigenous tribes were seen as an inferior class. There are around 900,000 indigenous people with a total of 240 tribes in Brazil in contrast to the 11 million indigenous people that lived there before the European colonist arrived. It was predicted that 90% died in the first years from diseases that they were not exposed to, such as the flu and smallpox, and the rest who survived the diseases were enslaved. Brazil has one third of the world’s rainforest and half of the amazon forest, but with the expansion of neoliberal policies deforestation has become a serious problem. According to Brazilian authorities, the rubber and cattle industries are responsible for 80% of the deforestation (COHA). This has evidently affected many indigenous communities that lived in the Amazon forest, displacing them from their lands and exploiting them for hard labor. By the 1950s, many predicted that the indigenous population in Brazil would disappear, but they have been able to recover by becoming active in the movement against neoliberal policies and their rights as human.

The tropical rainforest is home to a great variety of plants, trees, flowers, animals, birds, insects, and reptiles. Due to the great variety, there are groups that are interested in the tropical rainforest like rubber tapers, farmers, cattle ranchers, and loggers. the issue is that there are so many different things that each group want to do with the Amazon rainforest and no one knows who should have the rainforest. The rubber tappers have lived in the Amazon rainforest for many generations and they collect the sap from rubber trees that grow in the Amazon rainforest. Cattle ranchers already own a small part of the Amazon rainforest. The loggers want the wood from the trees to make buildings such as hospitals and important office buildings.

Amazon Watch is a nonprofit organization contributing in the fight for human rights in the Amazon rain forest region in South America.The Amazon rain forest ever since modern-day industrialization and after the colonial conquest became one of the greatest resources for natural Goods in the world and quickly became a victim of our industrialized societies. Today exploitation of the Amazon rain forest for its natural resources has become evermore damaging to the local biosphere and to the cultures that live there. Amazon Watch contends that since rain forests are necessary for the sustainability of the planet , that protecting the world's largest rain forest and most bio-diverse should be a long one of our top priorities is to protect. Not only does the Amazon rain forest house animals and plants but around four hundred different indigenous groups live with in the Amazon rain forest and have been living there for hundreds of years without disturbances .Founded in 1996 Amazon Watch campaigns for human rights, working closely with indigenous people of the

My groups goals in the Tropical Rainforest is to make a living from Rubber Tapping, but because of certain deforestation methods like clear-cutting Rubber trees are becoming scarce. The process of rubber tapping a tree is much like getting maple syrup from a maple tree and in no way is harmful. In order to protect our goals of making a living off Rubber Tapping we are asking for protected reserves of part of the

Cargill and Bunge are two American-based food giants that are causing deforestation in the Amazon. “Cargill and Bunge, are the only known agricultural traders.” Hiroko Tabuchi, Claire Rigby, and Jeremy White writers from the New York Times investigated how these food giants are the problem that are causing the Amazon deforestation. In their article “Amazon Deforestation, Once Tamed, Comes Roaring Back.”(2017), Hiroko Tabuchi, Claire Rigby, and Jeremy White informs that the world's largest rainforest the Amazon has rose in

“Since 1996, at least 1000 activists have been murdered in Brazil while facing down the timber industrys chainsaws.” (Greenpeace 2014). The Amazon deforestation protesters believe that the demolishing of the rainforests should be stopped due to the killing of thousands of animals, people, and the crippling effects to the environments occurring daily to produce oil and wood sources to gain money from countries like America and China. Currently thousands of protesters are patrolling the Amazon in

Stewardship and economical asset use and how they apply to the Amazon Rainforest: Maybe the most perfect way to deal with location deforestation in the Amazon is by building up another insurance course of action in light of the principle of supportable usage and change of rainforests. Sensible change is an expression that has been used every now and again over the earlier decade, however savants will quickly tell you that assembling natural items, latex, and nuts from the rainforests is inadequate make a living also reinforce a creating economy. "Financial Improvement" should consider a shrouded thinking to be joined through technique to distinctive experts and business undertakings included in the usage and progression of rainforest grounds and resources. Under Brazilian law, a critical piece of the Amazon is fundamentally an open access resource, so there negligible catalyst for squatters, farmers, or originators to use timberland grounds or resources in a conservative way.

On this website https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MdRZP83-S8GZgHuuPFEnvnrOjsl9zTm22KB9wL8V_qs/edit?rm=minimal, says that “Rubber tappers believe that their right to the rainforest comes from having worked there for so long.” This evidence shows that rubber tapper believes that they should have rights to the rainforest like other groups in the rainforest. They have been in the rainforest for many years and they believe that they have earned their right to continue protecting and using rubber resources from the forest. Another piece of evidence from https://www.wwf.org.br/informacoes/english/?46182/Rubber-tappers-from-Brazil-Peru-and-Bolivia-share-experiences-on-rainforest-rubber, states that “WWF is supporting the production of wild rubber, as it is one of the rainforest products that help underpin forest conservation, by providing a natural, sustainable harvest that can benefit local people.” This information states that An organization is supporting a rubber product called “wild rubber” that is in the rainforest to help support the forest restoration by creating and establishing a safe way to bring resources to the public. “Rubber tappers and their families became the only group in Brazil that physically prevented deforestation. At times, they and their wives and children would sit in front

Their toil is to create an understanding, appreciation and valuing of nature by people and corporations alike. To achieve this end, they engage with governments, civic societies, and companies to raise awareness and prevent rampant destruction of the eco-balance in these places especially by business interests. Rainforests are very vital in terms of regulating the world’s climate as well as with the provision of fresh water (Wonderopolis, 2016). Additionally, they are home to fast disappearing numbers of people who in most cases, have their whole lives

The rubber tree tappers are living in the amazon basin,this all started in 1750 when they started tapping in the amazon rainforest and as more people did it they had more rubber latexey sap and they still do it today in different countries like the phillipines

Many people are for the economic development of their countries, but for the Kichwa villagers if the economic development meant giving up their territory in the Amazon rainforest then they were against it. The Kichwa villagers wanted to protect the rainforest from the Ecuadorean army and one of the biggest companies in South America. The land covers 70,000 hectares of pristine rainforest. The villagers were told by the Petro Amazonas a state-backed oil company that they would begin prospecting on January 15, 2013. The community members began a legal battle to stop the state-run firm assisted by a British businesswoman, who was married to a village shaman and was appointed to run an Eco Lodge. Not only was the economic development of the Amazon

Amazon timber is found in the Amazon rainforest, South America. The Amazon is home to many diverse species of both flora and fauna, timber being a valuable resource harvested from making room for crops, farms and roads as well as logging. 95% of all loggings are done within a 5km radius of a road, both legal and illegal. As the dense Amazon rainforest is difficult to infiltrate, loggers resort to illegally cutting trees down to form roads in which they can use to gain access to more trees. As a consequence of this, out of the 170,000kms of road in the Amazon, for every 1km of legal road there is a least 3km of illegal. Once cut down to trees are cut into smaller pieces (see figure a) and shipped to warehouses

From 1880 until roughly 1919, the Amazon rain forest became and economic attraction because of its vast resources of rubber trees. Soon, such large quantities were being exported by Europe that mass production of the resource took over in other parts of the world by European plantations which drove the costs down. The British, Dutch and French plantations of Southeast Asia soon took over the lead in this industry.