Speedy Motors Inc

Pretend you supervise the correspondence unit of the health information services department of a medical center. Today, you received a subpoena duces tectum from an attorney, demanding either the originals or copies of all health records concerning Mary Smith, who allegedly is or was a patient of the medical center. The subpoena lacks sufficient information for you to determine whether Mary Smith is or was a patient in your facility. The subpoena is not accompanied by a valid authorization to release information for Mary Smith, as required in your state. (Case Study, p. 62)

Question 1: Using budget data, how many motors would have to be sold for Waltham Motors Division to breakeven?

A2 Auto Corporation is one of the world’s largest manufacturers and distributors of automobiles and automobile ancillary parts. In its Form 10-K, filed with the SEC, the following information was disclosed.

But the law has evolved to where the seller has to disclose material, latent defects that they are aware of pertaining to the home that is being sold. Failure to disclose defects is a part of the evolution of the law. Under failure to disclose, if the seller is found o have known about a material defect, not disclosed the defect, and the buyer relies on the seller’s word to their detriment, the seller is found to be liable to failure to disclose. For example, in Johnson v. Davis, 480 So. 2d. 625, the Johnson’s know of the leaky roof in the home that they were selling to the Davises, but the represented the home as if there were no defects. The Courts rules in the Davises favor because the Johnsons had a duty to disclose defects that are material so that the buyer will not rely detrimentally on them. The same rule applies in the Powell v. Knox case. The current case distinguishes from the Johnson v. Davis case because Mr. Knox testified that he had no knowledge of the contaminated soil in the backyard, because he and his late wife never attempted to plant veggie only flowers. He also testified that his hearing is not that best, which prohibited him from hearing the parties across the street. The jury found that Mr. Knox was not had liable for failure to disclose due to Mr. Knox not having prior knowledge of the defects and the Powells willingness to overlook the issue for the chandelier in Mr. Knox’s

Plaintiff, Kaycee Land and Livestock, opened a case to hold Defendant, Roger Flahive, personally liable for (contamination) damages after an agreement made by Flahive’s LLC, Flahive Oil & Gas. The District Court of Johnson County presented the case to the Supreme Court of Wyoming to determine if Flahive could be held personally liable. Kaycee Land and Livestock contracted with Flahive Oil & Gas in order to use the surface of the land to raise the Plaintiff’s livestock. Kaycee Land and Livestock claims that Flahive Oil & Gas contaminated the surface area, leaving it useless for Kaycee Land and Livestock’s needs. Flahive Oil & Gas does not have any assets. Therefore, Kaycee Land and Livestock wants to use general corporate veil-piercing principles

Unbeknownst to the plaintiffs, the funds meant for their benefit were transferred without their consent to benefit the fiduciary, who was reasonably relied upon to manage his brother’s Estate with integrity, thus injuring the plaintiffs, which meant that these transactions were fraudulent. In a previous case, Sher v. Sandler, 325 Mass. 348, 353, 90 N.E.2d 536 (1950), the remedy decided on by the court was to rescind the transactions the fiduciary made when the breach of duty to the beneficiary was found. This same case provided a precedent for the use of the defendant’s remaining assets, untraceable to the fraudulent transactions, as remedy to the injured plaintiffs. The plaintiffs’ request for equitable relief was therefore found to be appropriate and reasonable, and was approved by the judge as a final judgment in accordance with Massachusetts Civil Law, which states that when there is more than one claim for relief, “the court may direct the entry of a final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims or parties only upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay and upon an express direction for the entry of judgment.” (Mass.R.Civ.P.

5. “Produce” and “provide” mean to provide a legible true copy of the original or any document and/or communication pertaining to the Plaintiff’s Interrogatories.

Johnson further contends that the circuit court abused its discretion by failing to exclude the Notice to Defendant and the OPD Form because the documents’ probative value was substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice. Specifically, Johnson asserts that the documents should have been excluded because they indicate that he had a pending criminal case, and that they indicate that he is indigent. The State, for its part, asserts that the documents were critical to establish that the contraband at issue here belonged to Johnson, and that any prejudice may have suffered did not substantially outweigh the evidence’s probative value. We agree with the State.

Speedy’s attorney, Susan Ross (Susan), stated that the product liability team had carefully examined every document to insure that no protected work product is included. Based on this assurance, Mr. Fitzgerald, the partner handling Speedy, instructed paralegal, Jackie Ballard (Jackie), to provide copies of documents requested by Beene. In total 402 pages are copied and sent to Beene’s offices.

Both parties consulted their attorneys whose guidance instructed them that they did not have to disclose the information. The motivating factor in both decisions was to protect the livelihood of their companies. The facts of the information that had been revealed to each company had not been proven.

Claims were well documented with appropriate investigative material and coverage was confirmed on each reported loss with Reservation of Rights letters issued when appropriate. Their initial investigations were detailed and handled with a sense of urgency. Reserves were

Defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company’s First Set of Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Plaintiff Regarding Collateral Sources

Based on the judge’s comments, he suggested that he might have reached a different conclusion if the instructions and the reports were to be separated into distinct parts in which one of them was in the quantum and the another one was on contentious issue of coverage. Besides that, the judge had clearly took a dim view of the reinsurers on claiming the privilege that would have to be disclosed anyway when Halcrow had provided their expert evidence to the court. The reinsurers might found

Critical path analysis is a method that is used to plan out the many activities involved in a project to be able to find the most efficient way of complete it and how to complete it on time.

Employees: Toyota considers employees as its most important stakeholders. This stakeholder group aims for job guarantee, career future and fair employment treatments.