Splenda Research Paper

Lustig addresses is excess fat production related to fructose consumption. People who consume high amounts of fructose tend to gain excess weight, which can lead to other health issues. When fructose enters the body, it is transported to the liver where it will be broken down into a usable form of energy. Fructose is eventually turned into pyruvate and undergoes pyruvate dehydrogenase creating acetyl-CoA. From acetyl-CoA, there are two possible pathways for fructose to take; fatty acid metabolism or the TCA cycle. The TCA cycle is limited in the rate that acetyl-CoA can enter. Because of this, when an excessive amount of sugar is consumed more acetyl-CoA will undergo fatty acid metabolism. Fatty acids are stored in the body as triglycerides. When too much sugar is consumed, fatty liver disease may result. This occurs when too many fatty acids are created, thus the body cannot ship them out to storage. Instead, these fatty acids become stored in the liver. An excessive amount of sugar intake will lead to fat production, but with proper exercise this problem can be mediated. Exercise can speed up the TCA cycle as well as allow gluconeogenesis, which drastically decreases the amount of fat production. This leads to the conclusion that not every person who consumes fructose will accumulate excess

Thesis: Overall, recent studies have shown that sugar substitutes isn’t and can cause potential health problems.

The use of artificial sweeteners in beverages and food has been on a steady rise since 1969, the year it was authorized in the United States of America. The popularity of artificial sweeteners has been on a rise because of the benefit that it is a zero calorie sweetener .Even though artificial sweeteners have some great benefits many scientists believe that it causes adverse effects such as cancer, weight gain and depression. I strongly believe that consumers are not aware of the side effects of artificial sweeteners hence the increase in consumption since 1969.

Obesity and its subsequent ailments are regarded as the leading cause(s) of death in the United States and many other parts of the world. As such, much deserved attention and controversy has been brought worldwide. Many people place blame for this relatively recent epidemic on the shoulders of high-fructose corn syrup, an artificial sweetener whose use has increased for many years alongside the rates of childhood and adult obesity. While they are not entirely incorrect in assuming a widespread increase in added sugars would result in more calories per product, more calories consumed, and therefore more calories stored in bodily tissue, high-fructose corn syrup alone is not solely to blame for this phenomenon.

Companies that use aspartame in their soft drink products, like Diet Pepsi and Diet Coke, are entangled with the safety controversy. Though both companies do not directly address the use of aspartame in their advertisement, their opinions of the controversy may be noted. Diet Pepsi up until 2012, like Diet Coke, used aspartame to sweeten their Diet Pepsi . However, Pepsi, during a rebranding movement, decided to end their use of aspartame; instead, the company now uses Sucralose (Spelnda) and acesulfame potassium (Ace K) . This decision was not explicitly advertised because the company did not want to draw attention to the fact that they are still using artificial sweetener . This switch is intended to help Pepsi’s taste and consistency last

This article was created by thirteen collaborators who are highly educated in the nutritional field. In this source, the authors thoroughly explain why high fructose corn syrup should be avoided and what exactly happens in our body when we consume products containing high fructose corn syrup. This source appears credible because it comes from the American Medical Association, in the Medicine and Public Health Division, which is a widely known and trusted source. This academic journal provides the point of view of corn manufacturers, as well as consumers, to show why it is such a popular component in many foods. However, it does mention that there is little evidence as to how exactly our bodies react differently to HFCS and sucralose. The article

Leukemia, Hodgkin lymphoma and myeloma are all types of blood cancer affecting the white blood cells, namely lymphoid or myeloid white blood cells or the plasma cells. In one research conducted in the Nurses’ Health Study, NHS, and Health Professionals Follow-Up Study HPFS, over a 22 years period, they found association between consuming aspartame and increased risk of the blood cancer. A large sample consisting of 77,218 women aged between 30-55 years old and 47,810 men within an age group of 40-75 years was taken. The average consumption of aspartame was calculated to be 114mg in HPFS and 102 mg in NHS. The results of the study prevailed a positive correlation between consuming diet soda and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and myeloma in men only. However, the risk ok leukemia increased for both men and women. (Schernhammer et.al. 2012) These results were examined and concluded with the reasoning of aspartame being a methyl ester which is broken down into toxic products inside our body. In another study, these products

Sucrose, commonly referred to as ‘sugar’, is a carbohydrate molecule consisting of 12 carbon atoms, 22 hydrogen atoms and 11 oxygen atoms, C12H22O11 (Cole et al, 2015). Sucrose is a complex disaccharide molecule comprised of two simpler monosaccharide sugars: glucose and fructose. The World Sugar Research Organisation (2012) states that sugar is vital in the daily intake of food, as it provides the energy to carry out cellular processes once it is broken down and absorbed by the small intestine and transported around the body through the blood stream. The World Health Organisation (2015) suggests the average adult meeting the recommended 8700kJ daily intake

Splenda is used every day when I drink my coffee so I made my choice to refute all things said about this nonnutritive sweetener. Did you know one packet of sweetener is 600 times sweeter than sugar? How much sugar does is take to get your tea just right? Nonnutritive sweetener has a few benefits, first it calorie free, instead of using mounds of sugar we can use maybe less than half a packet and you got the sweet taste. I refute this article, based on research I came across “Toxicity of Sucralose in Humans: A Review” the article providing information for the toxicology safety for the consumer use.

Splenda is a synthetic product that replaces sugar it is a zero calorie backup and is not addictive, helps cut down on pollution from the creating of sugar, isn’t hard on soil, much easier to mass produce, doesn’t need as much land to mass produce as regular sugar because it is made from a sweetener that is 4 times sweeter than sugar cane but has zero calories. So artificial sweetener like splenda has had a big impact on people's lives that were addicted to regular sugar it is a zero calorie alternative. But at the same time,

There are many studies claimed that the using of artificial sweetener may lead to many health hazards to the human’s body. Although, Olney et al (1996) claimed that there is a link between the Aspatame (artificial sweetener) and the rate brain cancer. However, a research by Ross (1998) contrasted the Olney’s claiming (1996) who pointed out that aspartame causes brain cancer. Ross says that their claim does not contain strong reliable evidence. He criticized

In today's large market of artificial sweeteners, according to Dr. Axe, Food is Medicine, Sucralose, also known as Splenda is one of the most popular artificial sugar companies in the United States. Artificial sugar and sweeteners are basically a replacement of sugar, in which the main difference is that it has fewer calories. Artificial sweeteners are often used in used in many different types of foods, but the most common use would specifically be beverages, dessert mixes, and baked goods. Although the common thought of sugar to be the best way of sweetening because of its raw nutrition, for certain people, such as diabetic people, people who are trying to lose weight, or pregnant women, artificial sweeteners can be beneficial to one’s health.

The debate between naturally derived sugars and low-calorie artificial sweeteners has been going on for years now. As our population’s obesity rate grows every year and health concerns related to weight-control grows along with it, natural sugar is scrutinized and we are told to keep away from it as it is our enemy. Over the last couple of decades, we have been introduced to more and more varieties of artificial sweeteners promising to deliver the same sweetness or even more sweetness than natural sugar (some offer as much as 200 times more sweetness than sugar) but with a much lower calorie content, or some even no calories at all. Artificial sweeteners such as Splenda, Sweet n’ Low, NutraSweet, and Equal have become popular as “better alternatives” to table sugar, promising to help battle weight gain and actually assist in losing weight. However, does this make it the healthier option? As with all things, both natural sugar and artificial sugar have their pros and cons, but in order to find the best option in regards to our health and futures, it’s important to weigh them according to scientific findings and research.

Obesity rates are on the rise, with about 33% of Americans being overweight. Many Americans use artificial sweeteners instead of sugar in an effort to control their weight. Yet, the safety of artificial sweeteners has stirred up a controversy. There seems to be evidence that the consumption of artificial sweeteners in large quantities is harmful and may even cause cancer. However, most people, including medical professionals, have deemed the moderate consumption of artificial sweeteners as safe and a good method of weight control. Still, there have been observations made that artificial sweetener consumption results in users being left feeling hungrier and eating more. Now psychologists at Purdue University 's Ingestive Behavior Research Center under the lead of Susan Swithers, PhD, and Terry Davidson, PhD, have compiled evidence of this occurrence in a study they conducted. Artificial sweeteners turn out to be real diet saboteurs. A healthy diet and exercise are common methods to fight weight gain. As part of a healthy diet many Americans substitute sugar with artificial sweeteners. Consequently, in an effort to cater to these people, many manufacturers have developed products containing artificial sweeteners instead of sugar. Products such as diet sodas and sugar-free cookies, among others, have been touted as healthy and are advertised as supporting a healthy diet helping consumers to effectively cut their sugar intake. Sounds easy, doesn 't it? Enjoy what you love to

Advertisement and commercial industries portray table sugar, and other artificial sweeteners as fuel needed by the body. Though body and body cells need sugar as fuel source. The body mechanism is just like the case of engine, there are bad fuels which can destroy engine. Table sugar is just a bad fuel for the body. Several research studies have arraigned sugar first culprit for the epidemics of complicated health problems such as diabetes, obesity, heart disease and cancer. Worst of it, several research now ranking sugar as addictive substance as drugs.