First, the essay is well constructed because Mae explains the issue and opposing positions clearly and in an engaging way. Mae includes quotes from articles and explains them thoroughly to show their relevance to the
To conclude, I really like this essay, the topic is very interesting because not everybody knows this information. However is for 2004. It has really good evidence, but I think it needs more of persuading. Also, I think this essay is not well organized. I think that it needs more personal
After reflecting upon my 30 minute writing submission, I do not believe I wrote a very convincing or persuasive argument. While reading through my paper, I recognized a few rhetorical appeals, however I do not believe I used them very effectively.
The essay fulfills the assignment. Content is developed and ideas are clear. The essay, however, demonstrates a less than thorough understanding of the concepts and facts and contains minor flaws. There is some room for improvement.
My peer review revealed they understood my message, it had good flow using transitional phrases, and my thesis statement was clear. My main weak area was my conclusion on both my peer reviews. My reviewers said my conclusion was too short and needed more emotion. I took their advice and rewrote my conclusion adding an emotional connection which I think helped improve my personal essay a lot.
This is important. Using spyware people could steal her business and use the ideas for themselves, and/or patent them so that she can’t use them. Since she’s a garage it’s likely that she’ll have a customer database with important information. If someone hacks her and steals this information then she may have to pay compensation to the customers and this would be expensive and may force her to go bankrupt. If she doesn’t go bankrupt then it would put an atrocious name on her, making it less likely that she’d steal customers from other businesses and more likely that she would lose her own customers, and if this happens then this would increase the risks of her getting herself into financial
This is the first time I have written an essay with some analysis of author’s craft. This unit helped me realized that I have not been analyzing enough (and well enough) in the past. I had usually only written 2-3 sentences, just explaining the quote. I never really went into depth, which made my supports weak. I feel my analyzing skills have improved while writing this essay as I have learned what a strong analysis looks like. A strong analysis is clear, detailed, and well supported. A thing I noticed about myself is that I constantly go off track while analyzing, so while writing my essay, I tried to stay focused. When finding my evidence, I needed to make sure they were the best to support my thesis/claim. I went in trying to find quotes
In March 20, 2013 at 2 pm there was a cyberattack in South Korea produced by a logic bomb. These attack was directed to banks and broadcasting companies in which it start erasing information of their computers. Also one day before the attack South Korea receive a malicious message and never think that it will cause chaos .Some people think that Whols produce the attack, because they have a screenshot that show that the message was send from Whols.
After submitting my mini essay and rereading it, I realized there are a couple things I could improve on. One being eliminating passive sentences. I could work on this by finding worksheets or lessons on passive sentences and practice identifying them and changing them to active. Learning how to avoid passive voice will help make my writing more clear, helping the readers understand my points easier. Additionally, it will help make my arguments sound stronger and keeps the sentences from being too wordy and becoming confusing. Eliminating passive voice will help make my writing more direct and clear and overall help improve my writing.
Two of the common known attacks on computing systems are the deployment of computer viruses and malware.
Apple’s built-in defenses just aren’t enough to ward off the latest waves of malware, experts claim. So how do we protect ourselves now?
Ethics are defined as “moral principles, as of an individual.” Giving dropped money back to a blind man is an example of good ethics. I believe in having a strong sense of ethics. Morality or morals can be defined as “of, relating to, or concerned with the principles or rules of right conduct or the distinction between right and wrong.” I believe having a good moral sense is crucial to participate in the world. Without one, you can make a lot of people angry, or you could get fired from a job. Legality or the laws which govern us are rules we are forced to live by. They keep us in line and stop us from doing unjust things. I believe in laws. Without them people who don’t have strong morals, or who are unethical, would be able to damage society.
A study of how computer games, as a modern narrative form, draw on and develop the tradition of espionage fiction.
a thrill to figure out how to break into a computer. Most people never have any
In [10], author proposed a scheme which identifies the malicious nodes by using aggregate signature algorithm. It associates three algorithms.