Civil War Research Paper

However, tension remained between the two ethnic groups, with a civil war raging between the

This work is focused on providing an analysis of Southern and Northern perspectives from a justifying point of view, in order to form an outline of the opposing sides' motives. Both parties were strongly driven by nationalism and had very different views and values, which they were compelled to protect throughout escalating disquiet and imminent violence.

The Civil War, a destructive and calamitous event in United States' history, which can never be forgotten. This was a complex conflict that took this nation through its darkest period. It cut to the very core of the political, economic, and social elements of American life. The civil war greatly impacted American history because it ended slavery, it led to military inventions, and it brought the north and south together.

The American Civil War, fought between 1860 and 1865 was one of the bloodiest conflicts in the history of warfare. At the end of the war, more than 600,000 soldiers were dead or wounded. The institution of slavery was ended and the United States was changed forever. Several causes have been suggested for the conflict, including the disagreement over the institution of slavery, economic differences between the north and south and a difference in how the Constitution was to be interpreted. Slavery, however, is the key issue that lies at the heart of the conflict.

Concerning the ethnic minorities of Burma, I believe that we are in a period where carefully analyzed humanitarian input can have a successful impact. Unlike the genocide in Darfur, we’re aware of a developing situation where large-scale genocide has not taken place yet. History further lends a hand in paralleling the cordoning in society of minorities such as the Rohingya with that of the black African minorities in the Nuba Mountains of Sudan. Lessons gained in the events in Sudan should be considered in defending the minorities of Burma who are facing human rights violation.

Due to this, civil war cannot be justified in the form of rehabilitation and reconciliation since fear will always exist, establishing a new life is difficult, and the prospect of war will never go away. Minors should not be forced or encouraged to engage in this terror called civil

In the first chapter, Zahra summarizes how children became the “quintessential victims of war”. She does this by exposing four cases in Europe before World War II: the Armenian genocide, Eastern European famine, transnational families, and the Spanish civil war. Several international organizations emerged and changed the focus of caring for the children. Instead of focusing on material and physical needs, people became concerned with the psychological needs of children.

The book War Against All Puerto Ricans Revolution and Terror In America’s Colony by Nelson A.Denis, was called to freedom after fifty years, this untold story is about the life of Pedro Albizu Campos and what he had went through while being the leader of helping Puerto Rico find their freedom. He saw Puerto Rico not being able to have their freedom and independence and horribly facing difficulties as a country, the Nationalist Party of Puerto Rico was in a rough position. Pedro Albizu became the first Puerto Rican man to graduate from Harvard Law School. As time went on he graduated and after he graduated from law school, he came to Puerto Rico to become an activist for suffering country to fight for what they deserved. Pedro watched his country become unsuccessful during the difficult events, he knew when he was old enough he wanted to make a change. During the war against the United States, Puerto Rico became weak as they began to run out of ideas to keep each other safe.Violence took over the island, assassins were sent to kill and repeatedly kill. During this time period President Harry Truman was killed by these assassins. Gunfights of no reasoning appeared in towns, police stations and post offices were being burnt down from left to right. In order to overcome these violent events, the US army developed thousands of troops and bombed two towns. Which, landed the first time in history that the US government had bombed their own citizens.

Unfortunately, our modern society has been marred with war and strife over its eventful lifespan. A civil disagreement, when accompanied by mass offenses, often ends with deadly war. Throughout history, many nations have been unable to solve their personal grievances with one another in a diplomatic manner. In many instances are solves through protest, boycotts and other contentious means. However, in some instances, society elects the worst possible alternative, which is often war. In retrospect, wars have been fought for many worthwhile causes, even by today's standards. Wars have been fought over liberty, injustice, the potential threat to national security and more. However, no war is more damaging than those that are civil. Brother against brother, father against father, neighbor against neighbor. These are often the most bitter of wars simply because they are so personal and contentious. As is the case with the American Civil War of 1861-1865, the varying degrees of hatred and disagreement resulting in massive deaths. Due primarily to the civil nature of the war, many lives were lost in an unnecessary and often brutal manner.

In this day and age, we find ourselves at odds with our “identity” as we find that not only are we representing ourselves, but we also have ties to religion, sect, tribe, and family (Angrist). This shows that despite the cohesiveness and threads that attach us, it has the power to pull people, families, and in some cases countries apart. This conflict comes to a head when religion and ethnicity are interwoven. Hence when divisions occur, this can lead to violent wars that destroy trust between individuals. This can ingrain a sense of uneasiness and distrust that plagues people’s ideas and leaves a country divided. This is particularly evident in Lebanon. Ethnic and religious division led to the festering of feelings of marginalization and discrimination, which boiled over into the Lebanese civil war, a war that claimed the lives of 150,000 people (Szekely). The anger and frustration birthed from this to chaos, and conflict has in turn increased the division between ethnic and religious factions and led to the crumbling of Lebanese nationalism. This essay is specifically aimed at assessing the relationships between ethnic and religious divisions in Lebanon and explores how it contributed to the civil war. This is done by identifying and analyzing the main actors and makes an explanation of the historical divisions stemming from the National Pact, branching out to include the consequences of the civil war on the political structures and the identities of the

Michael Banton looks into the issues concerning topics such as ethnic dimension, mobilisation, ethnicity, race and conflict. In this article Banton focuses on conflicts which are considered to be ethnical conflicts; these conflicts are derived by certain types of motivations. Baton looks at secondary data demonstrating surveys of 92 armed conflicts within the years of 1945-89. Through these data the author recognises that many of the ethnic conflicts had come about at the time that imperial powers were no longer able to support political frameworks which they had placed upon the country. Overall the author suggest that within shared ethnics there is a collective action in achieving a common shared goal. This is achieved through collective shared

The process of decolonization in Southeast Asia was not totally a violent struggle due to the divers natures of the process of decolonization and the fight for independence in the various Southeast Asian nations. Furthermore, although the struggle for the withdrawal of the colonial masters was lined with bloodshed and violence, there were still moments in which peaceful negotiations managed to take place, rendering the process of decolonization in Southeast Asia a largely violent struggle as one cannot say that it was totally violent due to the differing situations that occurred in the different Southeast Asian nations during the process of

The establishment of a coalition government did not end the conflict, especially in the relatively calm areas of the conflict in the first two years. The violence around the country's largest city has led to mass displacement in parts of

These riots happened to get bigger and turned into battles. These battles lead to a lot of people dying. This has been Sri Lanka 's big plan, to attack the Tamils. They also had many more plans that they went along with too. Their plans made them do things that they didn’t want to do,but they did them anyways. One thing they did was damage the property. “By July 28, there was an estimated $300 million in property damage…” (Mitchell, pg.3). They didn’t care much about the property while they were battling. These battles kept getting bigger and badder. They soon began to do target killings. The Tamils would mainly target anyone they thought was a Tamlin instead of a Sri Lankan. They just watched the LTTE hurt and kill people. There was a hospital where everyone went to during the battles to not get killed. The hospital, where everyone went to get away because they thought it was “safe”. There was no safe place to go in these battles because the “safe” place (the hospital) soon got blown up. After the explosion the hospital wasn 't much help for them. In the Puthukkudiyiruppu hospital, “At least nine people were killed and at least 20 others were injured…”(Evans, pg.3). Even if you try to escape the hospital before it got blown up, you would’ve got killed.

For more than 25 years in the late 20th century and into the 21st, the island nation of Sri Lanka tore itself apart in a brutal civil war.  At the most basic level, the conflict arose from ethnic tension between Sinhalese and Tamil citizens.  Of course, in reality the causes are more complex, and arise in large part from Sri Lanka 's colonial legacy.