St. Paul V. Uber Case Study

Talal Ali Chammout picked up an Uber rider, and drove her to her residence. Chammout followed the rider into her home, where he proceeded to sexually assault

On August 11, 2017 Police Officer Lawrence Lezewski, DSN 11428 manning vehicle 2426 and I (Probationary Police Officer James Harris III, DSN 0513) manning vehicle 2425 received a radio call for an “Assault” at North Broadway and Salisbury Street on a Bi-State Bus. Upon our arrival, we were met by victim Eddie Dickens and witness Willie Penson (Bi-State Bus Driver), who stated the following:

However, the positive drug test reported to Landstar was false, Black’s personnel file contained an “inconclusive “ test result, not positive. Powers, an Usher representative that completed Black’s form, admitted that the report of the positive test was a “mistake on her part” (Black v. Usher Transport, 2011, para. 14). There was no evidence that Power’s purpose was to deceive Landstar. Instead, the courts thought it was negligence in reporting. With regards to the arrest and unauthorized passenger, Usher Transport submitted a deposition testimony that supported its contention that Black was arrested while employed at Usher Transport. Baker, Vice President of Safety at Usher, received a call informing him that Black’s truck was left stranded at a Marathon truck stop, due to Black being arrested over an altercation with another driver. Baker testified that he interviewed the driver involved and a witness that confirmed the altercation occurred, and Black had been arrested that day. After receiving this information, Baker placed the incident into Black’s file. The third allegation involved an unauthorized passenger. Black stated his investigation revealed an unauthorized passenger was in the truck (Black v. Usher Transport, 2011, para.

S. Supreme Court end up taking a step backwards to examine was the “Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (2009), which is a case that involved an anonymous tip that a resident was selling narcotics” (“Arizona v. Gant”, 2009). LEOs knocked on the door and asked to talk to the owner, but Gant opened the door and specified that the owner will return later on. They left, but not before they conducted an outstanding warrant check, at which time it was revealed that Gant had a suspended license and an outstanding warrant for driving with an adjourned license, and a warrant for his arrest. Therefore, they returned later when they observed a man at the back door and a female in the driveway in a parked

In summary, on 09/03/15 at 2335 hours Ofc. E. Lara #244 and I were patrolling the area of 1400 S. Cicero Ave., at which time I observed a female walking southbound on Cicero Avenue. The female was wearing a black shirt and tight jean shorts. The area is a known location for prostitutes to solicit their business. The female was walking southbound close to oncoming traffic attempting to gain attention of any vehicle that passed. I observed a vehicle stop on the corner of 14th St./Cicero Ave., (98' gold Cadillac IL Y755449) with two male occupants. The driver of the vehicle waved his arm out the window towards the female, at which time the female entered the rear passenger seat. The vehicle traveled southbound Cicero Ave./14th St. without using

Reasoning: In the courts decided that the Agent wasn’t responsible that the agent was doing his job to have him arrested for sales of heroin.

Summary of Hammer v. Dagenhart, 247 U.S. 251, 38 S. Ct. 529, 62L. Ed. 1101 (1918)

From the very first paragraph of article « Judge Rules NYPD… », which speaks about the police illegal practice of searching the criminal activity suspects, through the methodology of stopping the driver’s cars. It’s immediately sent me back to the Sandra Blanc’ case, which I used, as an example during my response to the Module 3 question. And, I wonder, how everything is connected.

In the video titled, “Top 3 Sobriety Tests – number,” the officer pulled over a female that appeared to be driving erratically. As the officer noticed the female, she was swerving her vehicle and crossing into one lane into the next without having any regard for other traffic nor the officer which was trying to make a stop of her vehicle. When the female finally pulled over to the right making a stop, the officer approached her front passenger door in which he asked the female a few questions about her consuming alcohol before the vehicle starting rolling backwards towards the officer parked patrol vehicle. After the officer made several verbal attempts to get the female driver to put her vehicle into park, she finally done so after the officer pointed out that her vehicle was still not in park. The officer then attempted to get the female’s driver’s license and insurance and, she provided them to the officer. The officer then asked the female drive to exit the vehicle. The officer attempted to speak to the driver as he was persisting that she perform a toe to heal walk and, the driver then attempted to tie her shoe in which she done after a few seconds of swaying back and forth. When the female driver tied her shoe, she attempted to stand back up and failed to do so for, the driver fell to the

In summary, on 08/15/15 at 0330 hours I was patrolling the area of 1500 S. Cicero Ave., at which time I observed a female black walking northbound on Cicero Avenue. The female was wearing a light blue sports bar and multi-colored boxer shorts. The area is a known location for prostitutes to solicit their business. I observed the female walking northbound close to oncoming traffic attempting to gain attention of any vehicle that passed. The female entered the Mobil Gas Station lot (1306 S. Cicero Ave.), at this time she made contact and entered a vehicle (White 07' Lexus IL N209786). The vehicle exited the lot and drove southbound Cicero Ave. and made a right turn at 18th St. without signaling.

Before the driver of the vehicle was actually pulled over by the law enforcement officer she had been weaving through traffic and hadn’t noticed that officer had been signaling for her to pull over. Once the officer

Victim Unegbu stated he did not call the police because he did not have the suspect's information, and Uber refused to provide

The officer believed Mr. Castile matched the description of a suspect in a nearby armed robbery from a few days earlier, radioing a colleague that Mr. Castile’s “wide-set nose” seemed to match the surveillance video from that case, and that his car also had a broken taillight (Capecchi NY Times)

Yes. Mr. Watsons’ clothing and vehicle description fit the description that had come over the police scanner. He was noticed by Officer Johnson and was pulled over and a DVM license plate check was conducted, and after Watson exited his vehicle and started

Uber drivers are not precedential to the up and coming class activity. Be that as it may, the choices ought to give some system to how the California court will continue. Uber, practices a considerable amount of control over its drivers while pronouncing to be uninvolved. Accepting the California court concurs with the discoveries, the court will hold that Uber's drivers are representatives and not self-employed entities.