Stakeholder Map

From 2004 to 2008 a mission begins to aggressively develop within the intelligence community that will change the face of the Department of Defense (DoD). Cyberspace Operations, particularly support to, breaks from small organizations and gains light in every day missions as well as the media. Complexity and connections of Cyberspace Operations makes this mission inherently a joint responsibility from training to execution. In the beginning the Army evaluated soldiers from all Military Occupational Specialties (MOS) and selected those that showed the capability to grasp complex problems and adapt to new technologies in order to staff this mission. These highly skilled soldiers received special training

Counterintelligence is one of the most vital areas of the United States intelligence system, and is heavily intertwined with our history, laws and ethics. According to the National Security Act of 1947, counterintelligence (CI) is defined as “information gathered and activities conducted to protect against espionage, other intelligence activities, sabotage, or assassinations conducted by or on behalf of foreign governments or elements thereof, foreign organizations or foreign persons, or international terrorist activities.” It consists of five activities and functions: operations, investigations, collection, analysis and production, and functional services. In this aspect, CI is unique in that it is both an activity and its product. U.S. intelligence agencies, including the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) collect and analyze both CI information and foreign intelligence. There are many counterintelligence activities that the United States is involved in, as both CI and foreign intelligence play an important role in countering threats to our country’s national security. Among these most controversial and misunderstood activities are counterespionage and disinformation.

Transformation can be almost impossible unless the majority of people within the organisation are involved and willing to help.(Cengage Learning AUS, 2015)

The United States Army’s shift to counterinsurgency over the last 15 years directed changes in all aspects of the service. This shift directed the Army’s emphasis away from the large conventional conflicts to counterinsurgency. During this shift counterintelligence spent the last 15 years mastering its role. Now the Army is adapting again due to the ever changing conflicts in the world. The 39th US Army Chief of Staff, General Milley, stated that the US Army needs to “re-focus on conventional training”. Since counterintelligence supports the maneuver it is continuing to adapt. Counterintelligence support to combined arms maneuver throughout unified land operations is not completely new to counterintelligence. Pre-counterinsurgency doctrine covers specific tasks and duties for counterintelligence personnel and are applicable today. Discussed below are the aspects of counterintelligence support to unified land operations in the offense and defense against the conventional threat of a hybrid force.

TCO G - Given that developing a “vision for change” and communicating that “vision” is a critical part of the change process, analyze the key elements of the “vision for change” and develop a strategy to communicate the change to the stakeholder.

Understanding the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) priorities are necessary to recommend any initiatives that will have the most value to the intelligence community (IC). The DNI fully identifies to the IC what his mission, vision, and goals are. The DNI uses the National Intelligence Strategy (NIS) to explain the objectives and the priorities for the IC. There are a few areas, which if made a priority would have a beneficial impact on the IC. These recommendations would not require a lot of resources. They include adapting one overall IC vision, enhancing current agency-to-agency communication, and furthering foreign relations within the IC.

Counterintelligence (CI) is a unique and challenging field in the United States government and within the United States Army. Thinking of what we see in the movies or what we read in spy books, we all want to think that a federal agent is portrayed as a James Bond or Jason Bourne. We imagine someone who jumps from rooftop to rooftop or out of helicopters to catch the bad guy. It may not be what we see in theaters, but we can paint a picture of who may be an individual within the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), or any other federal agency. These entities are tasked to protect the country with utmost importance to national security. What characterizes someone

In today’s operational environment, Special Operations Forces (SOF) and interagency partners are interconnected. A clear understanding of authorizes allow SOF elements to articulate their operations with interagency partners. The article, “Demystifying the Title 10-Title 50 Debate,” highlights the underlining tensions between the military and intelligence agencies.

Counterintelligence plays a crucial role in any operation. Counterintelligence is defined in Executive Order 12333 as the means information gathered and activities conducted to protect against espionage, other intelligence activities, sabotage, or assassinations conducted for or on behalf of foreign powers, organizations or persons, or international terrorist activities, but not including personnel, physical, document or communications security programs.” CI can led to a successful or a disastrous mission. In the case of the Bay of Pigs, it was a major CI failure.

Army counterintelligence (CI) serves a tremendously important function within the United States Army and the overall US Intelligence community. However, the utilization of Army CI is very flawed. Agents are recruited from the best the US Army has to offer via a formal application and recruitment process. After acceptance into the program, prospective agents are sent to the CI Special Agents Course (CISAC) at Fort Huachuca, Arizona for approximately 19 weeks. During CISAC, future agents are trained on CI investigations, source operations, discreet surveillance, as well as evidence collection. After CISAC students graduate as badged and credentialed CI special agents. Agents leave CISAC completely motivated to thwart our nation’s adversaries, however they often find

So what is the plan? In this I will discuss in detail, events that has caused the IC to struggle in the eyes of the people of the United States, issues for the IC as it moves into the 21st century, what the plan is to financially support changes, if any, for this IC evolution and future sustainment and recommendations for shaping an IC that will be flexible and capable for national security concerns and threats restoring the faith of the people stronger than ever.

The current state of Counterintelligence (CI) in the Intelligence Community (IC) is for the most part adequate. Still today there are many agencies who conduct these types of mission, even though the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) primarily the lead when it comes to CI. Agencies like the United States Army Criminal Investigation Command (CID), Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS), Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), the Unites States Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI), and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) are some of the different agencies which conduct CI missions and operations.

To produce a set of recommendations in a written document about how McDonalds PLC, can reduce its carbon footprint through the management of key stakeholder relationships.

Changing stakeholder’s behavior is the biggest challenge. Cook used a transformational approach. By using the analytical techniques of surveys and interviews, along the task oriented group projects and watching people’s behaviors, she succeeded in creating a new GIO culture (Mehta et al., 2014).

Counterintelligence (CI) involves actions aimed at protecting the United States against foreign intelligence operations and espionage from penetration and disruption by hostile nations or their intelligence services (Lowenthal, 2014). Three main components of Counterintelligence include collection, defensive and offensive. The collection is the ability to gather intelligence information about rivalry capabilities against own nation; defensive part of CI involves measures to prevent and thwart other nations ' attempts to penetrate into own nation 's intelligence system; while an offensive aspect deal with running double agents to penetrate, manipulate, exploit, and control targeted adversaries. CI is said to be the most essential aspect of the intelligence disciplines, in the sense that it helps in collecting vast quantities of secret information and produce an excellent analysis of intelligence, although, ineffective counterintelligence measures may diminish confidence in the final results (Van Cleave, 2013).