Stamp Act Dbq

     The passing of the Stamp Act by Parliament in 1765 caused a rush of angry protests by the colonists in British America that perhaps "aroused and unified Americans as no previous political event ever had." It levied a tax on legal documents, almanacs, newspapers, and nearly every other form of paper used in the colonies. Adding to this hardship was the need for the tax to be paid in British sterling, not in colonial paper money. Although this duty had been in effect in England for over half a century and was already in effect in several colonies in the 1750?s, it called into question the authority of Parliament over the overseas colonies that had no representation therein.

1) The Stamp Act Congress consisting of twenty-seven delegates from nine of the colonies. They met and passed resolutions that were meant to make Parliament repeal the Stamp Act. However, they still insisted that they were subjects of the king. They never tried to split themselves from Britain. In fact, while they were protesting taxations without representation, they still claimed obedience to the government. All they wanted was to reform the acts, not stop being British or remove all British government. By the definition given, they were trying to remove the imperfections, as they saw it, of the stamp act to make the British government over them better.

When the Stamp Act was passed by the British in 1765, the colonists had several reactions. George Grenville, who was the British Prime MInister, persuaded Parliament to pass the Stamp Act. The Stamp Act caused several reactions because it was a law that taxed all printed goods, this included

I was at school again, i told mr.tucker how the people protested against the Stamp Act. People sent letters telling them to remove the Stamp Act since it was preposterous idea it didn't help the colonies prosper during that time. All it did was bring the economy down for the British colonies.For a British family who was in middle

Junior Gonzalez The Stamp Act was horrible for the colonists because they didn't have a say in the stamp act, the tax was used to pay off the money they used in the French and Indian War. The colonists tried to get rid of the tax collectors but this would result in the colonists destroying their town, and the colonists boycotted British goods so they had to start making their own clothing or have them wear the clothing for months. The British bought raw materials from the colonists, then the British would make something out of the material they bought and then the British would sell it back the colonists. But since the colonists refused to pay the additional tax, the British didn't want to buy anything from the colonists, which

2. The principal major American resistance to British arrangement came in 1765 after Parliament passed the Stamp Act, an assessment measure intended to raise incomes for a standing British armed force in America. Under the standard of "no tax imposition without any political benefit," settlers met the Stamp Act Congress in October 1765 to vocalize their restriction to the expense. With its establishment in November, most pioneers required a blacklist of British products, and some sorted out assaults on customhouses and homes of assessment gatherers. Following quite a while of dissent in the provinces, Parliament at long last voted to nullify the Stamp Act in March 1766. Most homesteaders proceeded to discreetly acknowledge British standard until Parliament's order of the Tea Act in 1773, a bill intended to spare the floundering British East India Company by extraordinarily bringing down its tea assessment and allowing it a restraining infrastructure on the American tea exchange.

Have you ever wondered how the road to the revolution started?The french and Indian tribe fought against the british American colonists and the indian tribe. It all started on January 1st 1754. By October 7 , 1763 the proclamation of independence started in 1763. November 27th , 1763 the french and indian war ended. February 6th ,1765 the stamp act by June 29th , 1767 the townsend act begun. March 5th , 1770 the Boston massacre started. May 10th , 1773 the boston tea party begun. April 18th , 1775 the lexington and concord started the war. By july 4th 1776 the declaration of the independence was written.Paragraph #2 {Navagation acts of 1660}Have you ever wondered

According to Kemp, Franklin was merely representing the wrong colony at the wrong time. And said that, although events in Massachusetts put Franklin on the hot seat, there was an underlying reason for Wedderburn’s attacks. Some of which were inherent, for instance, the ideologies between American Colonists and the British Elite were very much different than how Franklin imagined the Empire. He believed that all colonists were grateful to be part of the Empire, and even went as far as to advocate ill-fated taxes to be introduced to the Colonies in an attempt to relieve some british debt. Furthermore, to the british mind, taxes that were being legislated were perfectly within the Empire’s right, and that every time taxes became too overwhelming, British officials would back down against resistance. Such was the case for the Stamp Act which was enacted in 1765 and repealed in 1766 after riots broke out in the Colonies.

b) In response to this new levy, 9 colonial delegates were sent to meet at the Stamp Act Congress of 1765 held in New York City. At this meeting, they protested their loss of American “rights and liberties” caused by the issuing of the Stamp Act as well as others like it. The Stamp Act was challenged by the ideas of the constitution and eventually repealed in 1766.

After the passing of the Stamp Act of 1765, the Stamp Act Congress, a collection of delegates from the colonies, met to respond what they felt was unjust taxation. 1765, the Stamp Act Congress passed a series of resolution which stated that the taxes placed on them were unconstitutional as the colonists were not represented in the decision–making process (doc. 2). The delegates voice the concerns of the common folk to the British Parliament with their resolution being aimed primarily at the king. King George III was the intended audience and the Stamp Act Congress addressed him with utmost respect as they were benevolent to the king, but felt the taxes were unjust. As a result, the Stamp Act was repealed, but the Declaratory Act was passed by Parliament reaffirming their control over the colonies. Overall, many patriots and colonists were angered by the various taxes and spoke out in various forms. Some boycotted English goods, and other joined revolutionary organizations like the Sons of Liberty. Daniel Dulany, a Maryland lawyer directly challenged the rule of Parliament by stating that the taxes which were passed purely for revenue without consent should not occur (doc. 3). Patriots like Daniel Dulany, others to voice their opinions. Joseph Warren, a Boston Patriot

During this time period our young country was still trying to figure out the right things to do and trying to avoid the wrong things. On top of that the French and Indian War had just ended and Great Britain was broke. Some of the new laws and acts benefited the colonies, others made it even harder and even enraged the colonists. George Grenville passed act after act trying to get more money out of the people. The first was The Sugar Act. This tax ended up costing the colonies four times the amount they were actually getting from it. Trying to make up for this, he created The Stamp Act. Parliament passed this act on February 13th, 1765.

The English have successfully defeated the French armies and their allies of Indian tribes in the French and Indian War, from 1754-1763. The British were able to control most of America as a result of the war. However, Britain was in debt due to the war and decided that the Colonies should assist in paying on behalf of the British war debt.

Americans, who did not elect members of the parliament, opposed the act not only because their inability to pay the tax, but also because it violated the newly enunciated principle of “no taxation without representation.” The constitutional principles and protest tactics established during the stamp act crisis laid the groundwork for the American Revolution. Arguing that not only their own representative’s assemblies could tax them, the colonies insisted that the act was unconstitutional. And they escorted mob violence to intimidate stamp collectors into resigning. Parliament repealed the stamp act in 1766, but issued a declaratory act at the same time to reaffirm its authority to pass any colonial legislation it saw fit.

During the British taxation and the organizational schemes that were introduced in 1763, North Carolina’s population reacted intensely. The Townshend Act, which allowed the British Land Tax to be reduced, led to the growth of radical elements. Both the Townshend Act and The Stamp act paved the way for the rise of a Son’s of Liberty group. The pressure on the colonial official in the colony was used to force abandonment efforts to implement the Stamp Act. At this particular time the royal government officials held on firm and even tried to enforce the law of taxations. North Carolina played a significant role by responded to the Tea Act. Their objective was to create and enforce non-imported agreements with merchants to drop trade with Britain.

There were several Acts and policies signed by the British Parliament that had led to the Tea Party such as the Stamp Act of 1765, the Townshend Acts, and the Tea Act. All three of these acts share one thing in common and that is patriots and/or colonists opposing what was said and done by the Acts. First and the most certainly the start of the discontent of the citizens, came the Stamp Act which was a tax passed by British Parliament on March 22nd 1765. “The Stamp Act, imposed by the British Parliament upon the American colonies in 1765, was the first major impetus given toward the American Revolution.”(Ritcheson, 543) The Act was inflicted on all colonists and required them to pay a fee on every part of printed paper they had used. Colonists however weren’t bothered by the immediate cost but by the standard it was presumably going to enable.