In April of 2005 then Florida governor Jeb Bush signed into law Senate Bill 436. This bill expanded and clarified the Floridians’ self-defense rights against violent attackers. In effect beginning October 1, 2005 the new law was written to relieve the burdens of a person that had the possibility of ending up a victim due to the actions of a would be attacker looking to threaten them or cause them harm (Wallace, 2006). While Florida was the first state to enact Stand Your Ground, Florida is now just one of 24 states that have similar laws (Lee, 2012). With the support of law enforcement, Stand Your Ground has become a popular law with a majority of citizens in Florida. Stand Your Ground has become a political statement for supporters of
Title XLVI of the Florida Statutes Chapter 776 talks about when, how and where a person can use deadly force to protect him or herself. Also it talked about when it is justified to do so. It further explain the term stand your ground and the right to retreat.
March 20: Florida Rep. Dennis Baxley, who sponsored the "stand your ground" law in 2005, says nothing in it allows people to "pursue and confront." The law allows people to use deadly force to defend themselves anywhere they feel a reasonable fear of death or serious injury. The Justice Department sends representation to Sanford to investigate and "to address tension in the community."
Intelligence gathering and collection in the United States has significantly increased over time. This paper examines how intelligence reporting and pre-mission planning was crucial to the success of the United Nations involvement at The Battle of Inchon during the Korean War. By examining how intelligence played a role in this battle, you will be able to understand why it is important to gather and collect intelligence prior to every mission executed. Intelligence collection should be the baseline for all military operations. Inchon Landing has an ample amount of actionable intelligence; collected and disseminated appropriately we will discuss how it played a role in a low probability mission accomplishment to the last great amphibious assault in history. This paper provides detailed explanations on why The Battle of Inchon was a success and what could have been the outcome had it gone the other way.
Imagine going back a few years, sitting in your kindergarten class learning how to read and suddenly a man in a dark black costume breaks down the door and opens fire; seconds later blood is spewed about the wall, your teacher is dead, and all the children around you are crying. It is situations like this that caused House Bill 60 to be created. This bill “ allow(s) residents who have concealed carry permits to take guns into some bars, churches, school zones, government buildings and certain parts of airports”. (Sayers and McLaughlin) This guns everywhere law should be protected, and everyone should
In 2005, Florida became the first state in the United States to enact the Stand Your Ground Law. Before the enactment of this deadly law, the justifiable homicides per year was around twelve. Many incidents have occurred since 2005. In 2016 seeing the stand your ground law are no longer foreign but, domestic. Violent altercations, police brutality, and naive judgements are the main reason why America is America.
Stand your Ground law states that a person may use deadly force in self-defense without the duty to retreat when faced with a reasonable perceived threat. When Stand your Ground laws were advocated in Florida and other states, their proponents marketed them as a reestablishment of a natural right, arguing “the duty to retreat has not always been a part of the common law”. The historical context may be misleading, allowing self-defense only when reasonably necessary, and a duty to retreat when attacked outside one’s home. The National Rifle Association seek to influence the Stand your Ground Law as a away for people to protect themselves. Though opponents who were against this law worried it would encourage the use of deadly force. For example, a 2004 case James Workman, a seventy-seven year old retiree who was sleeping in his RV, where an intruder busted into the trailer. James shot the intruder and had to wait months for the verdict. Prosecutors then decided the shots he
The United States Constitution is a social contract between the U.S. government and its citizens, which promises their [the citizens’] rights and liberties will be protected. The Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights states that every citizen has the Right to Bear Arms; moreover, it means that an individual has the right to defend him or herself from physical harm. States are passing Stand Your Ground laws, which are similar to the Castle Doctrine (one has the right to defend oneself in the confines of his or her home), but the Stand Your Ground laws extend the range; instead, people may defend themselves using deadly force in any area they are permitted access (Jealous, 2013; Cox, 2013; Moore, 2012). Stand Your Ground laws contain flaws wherein predators or vigilantes may twist the law to their benefit, yet the Stand Your Ground laws are meant to justify the deeds victims must perform in order to defend themselves. Stand Your Ground laws are beneficial through their fundamental purpose, but how defendants are abusing the laws and how critics claim that the presence of a gun influences the victim’s decisions during an attack are detrimental to the enhancement of the laws.
What has become known as “Stand Your Ground” laws were first introduced in Florida in 2005 after much lobbying by the NRA. These laws expand castle doctrine laws, which allow people to use lethal force to protect their homes or “castles,” to include the legal use of deadly force in public even if safely retreating is a possibility in a threatening situation. Since 2005, similar laws, though all in varying degrees, have been put into effect in 21 other states (Lopez, “What ‘Stand Your Ground’ Laws Actually Do). While many argue that these laws make society safer and protect individuals in hostile situations, the majority of studies done prove otherwise. One study found that in states that passed these laws, there was a 53% increase in justifiable
The Stand Your Ground laws are placed into effect as a measure to protect the honest American citizens in cases of self-defense. They allow citizens to defend themselves using deadly means without an attempt to retreat from the situation. The laws remove the “duty to retreat” when a person is attacked in public. In turn, they allow the citizen to meet their attacker, using force against force. In Florida, victims can declare immunity from trial under Stand Your Ground—however they have to prove to a judge at a preliminary hearing (with a mass of evidence) that they acted in self-defense.
In November of 2007, a man living in the Houston, Texas area pulled a shotgun out and killed two men he believed were robbing a neighbor’s home. The 61 year old man called 911 and asked the operator to dispatch police to capture the two men. The operator warned the man to stay inside, but he responded to the operator stating, “I have a right to protect myself too, sir. The laws have been changed in this country since September the first, and you know it.” In the previous months, Texas legislature had passed a version of the Stand Your Ground law that removed a
Though each state that has enacted this law has its own interpretations and specifications, the Stand Your Ground Law generally permits the use of deadly force when a person feels a threat of death, serious bodily harm, rape, kidnapping, and robbery in most states, even if there is an option of retreat. The current Stand Your Ground Law, passed by legislation in 2005, applies to public settings; the Castle Doctrine is basically a Stand Your Ground Law that applies to the defense of oneself in a private abode or home. States currently enacting this law include Florida, Alabama, Michigan, Indiana, Nevada, Utah, and 17 others. Stand your ground law provides legal protection for protecting oneself and property at all costs and prevents civil lawsuits.
For instance, there’s no guard against a person being able to claim “self-defense” or “Stand Your Ground” after aggressively pursuing another person. Take for example, the case of Trayvon Martin. Zimmerman had no legitimate rights to pursue Trayvon. He was unarmed. Zimmerman instead felt like a vigilante, who is entitled to the Stand Your Ground immunity. In writing, the law is designed to protect and prevent an attack from one person to another, not the other way around. Nowhere in the original statute or the aforementioned bill does its say this, there’s still an obligation to retreat in Florida. Furthermore, I find it astonishing that in nearly a third of the cases defendants initiated, shot or pursued their victim. One would think with the on-growing statistic the passed bill would have address the duty to
To begin, what is the “Stand Your Ground Law”? Well many states such as: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia have stand your ground laws which state that individuals do not have to retreat before using force in a self- defense situation or many states have laws that are remarkably similar to stand your ground laws. Stand Your Ground laws started in 2005 when Florida was the first state that passed the stand your ground law which basically allowed individuals to stand their ground instead of fleeing or retreating if they believed
Everyone in this world has a belief in a purpose. Sometimes not everyone is going to agree with you, so it's important that you stand up for what you believe in.
Within the pro-choice world there are many issues that are discussed like abortion, the instant where life begins and the use of contraceptives. This article will focus on not only the issue of using of contraceptives, but specifically the distribution of oral contraceptives (“the pill”) to teenage girls without their parent’s consent.