Stand Your Ground Law Arguments

The Stand your Ground Law has recently been debated to be a just or unjust law of retaliation. The stand your ground law permits individuals to use deadly weapons when they feel threatened or can be harmed. That means if one feels that they are in fear of losing their life they have every right to defend themselves by any means necessary. This law does not state that if someone is not in the way of facing physical harm or losing their life that they have a right to kill someone else.

Personally, I strongly disagree with the Stand Your Ground Law and believe that the Stand Your Ground law is widely controversial for a plethora of reasons: it promotes violence, it causes major racial issues, it acts as a justifiable excuse for taking another human beings life, and it makes the offender who committed the murder or violent offense feel justified for their wrongdoings. As of late many cases have occurred involving the Stand Your Ground law; however, none have been more controversial, more compelling, or illustrate my views better than the Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman case (State of Florida v. George Zimmerman) and the Marissa Alexander v. The State of Florida case.

Zimmerman then called 9-1-1 and reported him to the police he then told the police he was following him the officer on the call responded by telling Zimmerman “we don’t need you to do that” but, Zimmerman continued his pursuit. Nevertheless, victim Martin was on the phone with a friend during this time knowing the man had been following him as Zimmerman continued to follow him Martin took off running like any other human being would who was being followed by a strange unknown person. Zimmerman chased after Martin where Martin was caught by Zimmerman and an argument broke out as to why he was following him, which lead to a scuffle according to Zimmerman where he then took his gun out and fired a shot into the 17-year-old killing him. In chapter IV and V hill points on the phrase “stand your ground” on several pages and points out William Blackstone, who provides us with legal thinker parses the crime three categories: justifiable, excusable, and felonious. Justifiable is a murder committed by the order of the state, excusable is an act of murder committed without intent. There is a “stand your grown” law that allows you to enact in ways needed to protect yourself if needed

The United States’ Stand Your Ground law, states that any and all individuals have no duty to retreat from any place they have lawful right to be, and may use any level of force, including lethal, if they reasonably believe they face an imminent and immediate threat of serious bodily harm, or death. Forty-six states have adopted a type of “Castle Doctrine,” meaning that a person has no duty to retreat when their home is under attack. Twenty-two states have removed that duty to retreat from other places in public as well. In those states the Stand Your Ground law thus states that a person has no duty to abandon a place that they have the right to be, or to give up ground to an assailant. These descriptions leave quite a large gray area, and many questions to be asked. So then, do Stand Your Ground laws need to be redefined, providing a clear answer to any and all questions that are asked about these laws?

There have been at least 26 teens and children who have died due to the stand your ground law. The Tampa Bay Times analyzed that out of one hundred and thirty-four fatal Florida cases that claimed the defense of stand your ground, a total of nineteen percent saw the deaths of teens and children (Thinkprogress.com). This law played a major factor in the cases of Trayvon Martin and Jordan Davis, two teenagers that were killed and unarmed at the time of their death. The main problem with this law is just because someone feels they are being threatened the law can justify the individual response in self-defense. In the case of Jordan Davis, a 17-year-old boy who was fatally shot by a 40-year-old man named Michael Dunn. After, Dunn complained about Davis music being too loud inside of Davis’s car. The encounter between the two gentlemen escalated after Dunn approached Davis vehicle.”The prosecution said Dunn shot Davis because he got angry when the teenagers wouldn't turn down their music when he asked them to and then "mouthed off" to him”(Huffingtonpost.com). As it continued to escalate, Dunn believed he saw a gun, so he shot inside the teenager car several times, and Dunn was justified in shooting into the unarmed teenager car. Why, because Dunn believe his life was in danger after believing he saw a gun.The facts of the case do not matter anymore, just the beliefs and feelings of the defendant. The stand your ground laws are

The Stand Your Ground law, which was passed in 2005, gives people the right to defend themselves. Many people are targeted every day for being a certain skin color, wearing certain clothes a certain way, walking to a store, even listening to loud music. If the Stand Your Ground law is to be implemented throughout the country it should be upheld and followed correctly. “I shot and killed someone because it looked like he had a gun”, is an improper way to use the law. The unknown subject killed the victim based off an assumption; there was no evidence to support his claim. “I shot and killed someone because he pulled a gun and aimed it towards me”, is the proper way to use the law. The victim stood his ground because he had probable cause to feel as if his life is in danger. If one is to use the Stand Your Ground law in court one must have probable cause and enough evidence to support one’s claim.

Standing up for your rights has been violated by many unjust citizens who have brutally annihilated blacks for an unknown reason. Taking advantage of unarmed citizens because of biased racism, is a behavior that isn’t necessary for any reason at all. Now, researchers who've studied the effect of the laws have found that states with a stand your ground law have more homicides than states without such laws. Because murder is a rare phenomenon, the numbers in any given state can be hard to analyze. It can be difficult, for example, to disentangle the effects of stand your ground statutes from other trends, such as natural fluctuations in the crime rate. Until now, there has been little attempt to rigorously study these laws at a national

Recently, a dispute has arisen over the validity of Stand Your Ground laws. The shooting of 17 year old Trayvon Martin, in 2012, by George Zimmerman, has drawn attention to these laws, especially in Florida. Each state interprets the law differently, case by case, dependent on the facts. With each state having a diverse law in its book, there is seemingly no collective self-defense rule. Many argue that the Stand Your Ground laws are just and necessary, while others argue that the laws are merely an excuse for cold-blooded murder. Stand Your Ground laws are seen as a scapegoat for those willing to commit murder.

The stand your ground law is by far the worst thing that the states could have ever done, because it makes innocent people get killed for no reason due to people just thinking that they are doing something wrong when they didn’t do anything to just get randomly shot. People should have the right to not have to feel afraid or scared, because of how people act towards one another. Understanding everyone’s rights, they really should put a restriction on what people are actually allowed to be doing to one another, whether there is actually danger around them or if they are just being ignorant to the other people around them. In all honesty, nobody should have to fear being shot at for no reason and we shouldn’t always have to live in a life that

In April of 2005 then Florida governor Jeb Bush signed into law Senate Bill 436. This bill expanded and clarified the Floridians’ self-defense rights against violent attackers. In effect beginning October 1, 2005 the new law was written to relieve the burdens of a person that had the possibility of ending up a victim due to the actions of a would be attacker looking to threaten them or cause them harm (Wallace, 2006). While Florida was the first state to enact Stand Your Ground, Florida is now just one of 24 states that have similar laws (Lee, 2012). With the support of law enforcement, Stand Your Ground has become a popular law with a majority of citizens in Florida. Stand Your Ground has become a political statement for supporters of

“ ‘Stand Your Ground’ laws allow an individual to defend him- or herself from someone who poses a legitimate threat, even if the threat occurs outside of the individual’s property,” (Auerbach). Some people believe that because “Stand Your Ground” laws allow for immediate self-defense without requiring someone to retreat or try to talk to the perpetrator, they encourage violence. While strong, this argument is flawed. When examined more closely, the law permits lethal force only if the victim feels that the attacker will cause loss of life or limb (Vercammen). Although the opposition to these laws stems from events in which “Stand Your Ground” laws have involved controversial homicides, New Jersey should

Living in a world and time as today as an African American male. We tend to endure different obstacles. One of the obstacles that black males today are challenged with is the stand your ground laws. Over the years, state legislatives have made an effort to make changes to the current laws that concerns self-protection in an unlawful situation. The stand your ground law pertains to those who are placed into situations where they’re protecting themselves from threatening impostors. The stand your ground law has many positive and negative connotations about it. A positive connotation is it allows victims in a crime to be able to protect themselves. A negative connotation is in a lot of criminal cases the court systems like to lo. It also doesn’t

The Stand Your Ground law expands and provides additional defense guidelines involving home or vehicle invasions. Before 2005 and Stand Your Ground, an occupant of a home or vehicle had to reasonably believe they were in imminent danger and that they needed to use force to prevent death or serious bodily hard to themselves or their home/vehicle, and provide proof of that fear (Hussein, 2014). This previous legislation was derived from the English Common Law known as the Castle Doctrine. After 2005 however, the intruder is presumed to be in the home or vehicle with the intent to commit an unlawful act involving force or violence and therefore, the resident can use any means to defend his home/vehicle from intrusion. Stand Your Ground in essence

The facts of how the “stand your ground” law reflects what occurred are simple. The law states that if a person is engaged in any unlawful activity and in the place where they have the right to be but does not intend to retreat before using force with the intent to cause harm or death (Justia, 2015). Miss Jones did not have to kill Mr. Lee because she shouldn’t have returned to the place of residency. Miss Jones stated that she felt threatened but she was away from the home and had every opportunity to have her friends to take her to the Police station, but she chose to go back home and retrieve her belongings and leave. When an argument is taking place, everyone knows that when the woman threatens to leave the man, it is not going to be that

There were times where, you would sit and pounder whether the United States is truly called the home of the free and the land of brave along with being known as the motherland of great opportunities and equality. With Great Civil Right Movements and Great Activist such as, Rosa Parks, Martin Luther King, Ella Baker, and many more. You would think and assume that the nation would be at peace. Yet there are wreathing of broken hearts, shedding of blood of bloodless crimes, and unfair laws. Like, the stand your ground laws, whereas the civilian that possesses the firearm can choose the option to retreat or using that weapon he/she is registered to, as self-defense. Recently, cause of that law an unarmed black teen was killed by an officer in training