Standardized Testing Argumentative Essay

The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of 2001 was put into place to provide extra money for children who do not have money while trading their knowledge using their test scores. The NCLB Act says that students are to be given yearly tests along with yearly report cards to track how well they are doing in school, in doing so, school is not about fun and socializing but now it is all business. These tests not only do not help the students learn but puts a load of stress on their shoulders, alongside that the tests have no purpose other than grading how well a students is able to retain information.

Initiated in 2002, the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of 2001 intended to prevent the academic failures of educational institutions and individual students, as well as bridge achievement gaps between students. This act supports the basic standards of education reform across America; desiring to improve the learning outcomes of America 's youth. This act was supposed to help the kids with their math, reading and math skills, but it just adds more pressure to the students especially for the children with learning disabilities (LD). The state has the students take the keystone exams which used to be called the PSSA`s.

I first became aware of standardized testing when I entered third grade. I’m sure I was being tested as early as second grade. However, this is when it started to stand out to me. I finally knew the “importance” of this test and why I needed to take it seriously. Teachers, my parents, and even my peers stressed how these test’s would determine the classes I was placed in for the start of my school career. Statistics show that standardized testing is the leading cause of our public education to fail year after year. Should students in the United States be measured by bias standardized testing?

Will standardized testing be the next thing taken out of United States school systems? This is a question many people are trying to find answers to. Standardized testing has become an issue for a lot of Schools in the United States and around the world. Many people are wanting to opt their child out of having to take these standardized tests. Parents do not think these tests should be given because of what they put the children through. Parents are eager to know how one day of testing can determine whether their child passes or fails. A Washington post news article explains the percent of student who have opted out of taking these tests. “This past spring, 20 percent of students in New York state opted out of mandated standardized tests, the scores of which are used to evaluate teachers through highly controversial assessment methods” (Strauss, V.) Washington post also shares statistics regarding roughly how many tests on average a student is required to take “…public school systems in the country, students in the 2014-15 school year sat over 6,500 times for tests, taking tests with 401 different titles” (Strauss, V.) Most

The No Child Left Behind act is quite an ironic one, schools that didn’t meet the standards right away received extra funding to train teachers and improve their curriculums; yet these students have text books that are almost as old as they are ( if not older), outdated technology, and all they’ve learned is how to pass the standardized tests. These students have learned nothing valuable, with the exception of how to use deductive reasoning on a multiple choice test, and how to fill in a tiny bubble without going out of the line! This bubble has limited students more than anything; it takes away creativity, kind of like when a small child is using a coloring book; they

The No Child Left Behind Act was passed by Congress in 2002. The law has a purpose to ensure that all children in the United States, receive a high quality education, so they can close the gap of achievement between the kids who do well in school, and the kids who do not. The people who support the NCLB, argues that this act will have a lot of positive effects. Some of the effects are the improvement of the student’s achievement; more time spent teaching the subject; better teachers and administrators; high expectations for the kids; the identification of poorly performing school and better confidence in school as the test score rise. Most of these are positive but the critics argued that there are some negative effects of the NCLB act. They say that this system is doing more harm than it is good. The fact that one test is the one indicator of weather students have learned what they needed to learn throughout school is crazy. There are psychologists that have said there should be more than one test done.

Standardized testing is a horrible way to show the learning ability of a student. It takes away all the fun in education, because the teachers have to focus on certain things to teach, and that is what will be on test. Students should be able to go to school and learn about what their future will hold or go more in depth with what they want to do when they graduate high school. Not to mention that standardized testing can be really stressful on students. We do not know what will be on that test, and we have a whole semester to get ready for them.

The No child Left Behind Act was signed into law on January 8, 2002. It is an updated version of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. The main goal of the No Child Left Behind Act was to provide all children with “fair, equal, and significant” opportunities for education and to increase international competition. With this act, it is now required by law to test students who are in grades 3-8 in reading and math and it is required for high school students to meet or exceed standards in math and reading. It also requires the state to create

As a teacher, I believe standardized testing in the classroom is good for the students, parents, and teachers. Standardized testing allows the students to use the skills they have been taught, recall information, use higher order thinking (based upon the setup of the test), and allows them to see areas they may be weak at. For the parents, standardized test, (when results are sent home) allows them to see how their child is doing with the content that they are being taught and an idea of how their grades will be. For the teacher, standardized test gives feedback on the teacher’s instructions and activities for the content area. It helps the teacher identify students to group together. It also helps provide data for students’ performance in

Since its inception in 2001, the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) has only made the divide in quality of education greater, and was ultimately detrimental to the American Education System. When President George Bush first proposed the NCLB, his intention was to level the playing field and provide an equally excellent education for every American student, what happened though, could not have been further from George Bush’s intentions. The whole basis of the NCLB is funding for performance, meaning that schools will receive funding proportional to how well they perform on federally mandated standardized tests. At the time that this program was created, American students were testing progressively worse as they matriculated in school. For

Like any argument there are those who are for standardized testing and then there are those against it.There are reasons such as stress factors that become major concerns and also having teachers to teach for the test instead of teaching for the progress of the students academic.

Standardized testing what is it good for? No, really why does the United States school systems have standardized test starting as early as 1st grade, also the tests does not really show the student’s own knowledge. There are three main reasons that standardized testing is bad for students to clarify, does it depict the knowledge of student correctly, schools/teachers teaching just for the test, and testing anxiety. First, people learn more than just math, science, English, and history (these are four main topics) they are the only one that schools can easily grade, however, they do not, have standardized testing for art, mechanical know-how, critical thinking, and common sense. These can be just as beneficial for the student to know if not

There is not a class I have taken in my twelve years of being a student where I have not had to take a standardized test. Growing up as the oldest child, I was able to see my two younger siblings advance through school, learning how to effectively learn and study in order to pass tests. I had always been adept in not having to study for an assessment so long as I paid attention in class, so seeing my dyslexic brother who also was diagnosed with ADD, struggle with testing was difficult. I realized then that standardized tests don’t value diversity and don’t place importance on any outside creativity a student may possess. My brother is very skilled in drawing and mathematics, but unfortunately standardized tests don’t allow him to express this

The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 was a US Act of Congress. This law took effect in 2002. This had an impact on US public school classrooms. Through this law there were several effects in the way schools teaching their students. this also affected what tests the students had to take and the teachers training. This also addressed the way schools and their districts were going to spend their monetary funds. The goal of this act was to provide educators assistance in planning and implementing programs that were designed to close the achievement gap between disadvantaged students and their peers. Accountability, choice, flexibility, and methodology were the four pillars of reform in NCLB (Evesham, 2017).

The No Child Left Behind Act was designed by President George W. Bush in 2001. Although this act seems to be cutting edge and has generated enormous amounts of both controversy and support, this is not the first time American Education has seen such an attempt to improve education. According to the U.S. Department of Education, the purpose of No Child Left Behind is to improve student achievement and change the culture of America's schools. ?The NCLB Act of 2001, the revised Elementary and Secondary Education Act, is a potent blend of new requirements, incentives and resources and it poses significant challenges for states? (?Education Commission of the States,? 2003). No Child Left Behind laws require that every state must develop