Ron Alweiss 12/5/17
Mrs. Smithers 8-1
Standardized Tests For The Win
Imagine there was another way, besides a report card, to prove someone’s intelligence! Standardized testing is a respected way of showing someone’s smarts and abilities in terms of English and math. Standardized testing has a positive impact on students because it’s a good way to see the knowledge of different kids that go to different schools, it shows you the format and what kind of questions will be on the test, so you’ll be ready for harder exams like the SAT, ACT, etc, and it can push their minds to their full potential.
Standardized tests allow different kids from all over the United States to have a fair and equal chance to prove their academic intelligence in
…show more content…
since both tests have similar types of questions and formatting. Also, students can push their minds further than they thought possible just by putting in a little effort and your full potential. One way to prove this is “The multiple choice format used on standardized tests produces accurate information necessary to assess and improve American schools (Source E).”This shows that the multiple-choice format makes grading much easier. Also, multiple choice questions give options of what the correct answer is, instead of normal fill the blank questions. Another example to prove this is “ ‘Teaching to the test’ can be a good thing because it focuses on the essential content and skills, eliminates time-wasting activities and motivates students to excel (Source E).” This means that teachers should teach the material on the test, taking stress off students to study so hard. Also, it eliminates activities that don’t benefit the students and it’s pushing kids to do their best. Next, a counter argument will be stated, but then will be
Standardized tests are unnecessary because they are excruciating to the minds of many innocent students. Each year, the tests get tougher and stricter until the students cannot process their own thoughts. The tests become torturous to the minds of those only starting in the world of tests. The students already battling in the war are continuing to fall deeper and deeper into the world of uncreativity and narrowness. As the walls narrow in on them, they are lost and unable to become innovative thinkers. Moreover, the implementation of standardized tests into the public school systems of the United States of America has controversially raised two different views –the proponents versus the opponents in the battle of the effectiveness of
When comes to education in America, far to offer our society labels people as un- educated because the inability to pass standardized tests. In reality, we shouldn’t base a person's ability to determine if they're educated because that’s far from the truth. I believe that standardized test isn’t the only way to determine every student’s education knowledge. For example, high scores standardized test doesn’t signify that you are talented thinking or a student. The goal of education is more education, but the majority of people like this don’t get the opportunity like others. Just think they could have been people who made good grades and excelled in school, but didn’t get a full ride scholarship to a certain college. There are people who didn’t go to college, but are successful today. It doesn’t happen, for the majority of us, but we can’t just single out those people who have originated up with creativity, intelligence with ideas or investment with no college background.
In 2200 B.C. Chinese, civil servants were assessed using some of the earliest forms of standardized testing. Men would be tested on everything from archery to rites and ceremonies. The archery test would consist of shooting three arrows into a target and would be graded based on how many landed. Three arrows would equate to an excellent grade, two was good and one was passable. Standardized tests have evolved since the 2200s. Today, standardized testing is used as the main form of assessment for students in the American school system. Children as young as four years old are required to take standardized tests when entering school. Is standardized testing the best tool for assessing student development and teacher competency? There are some that would argue that standardized testing has its place, but there is an overwhelming majority that would disagree. From California to New York, there is evidence against high stakes standardized testing. Students and teachers alike buckle under the weight of these tests. Who could blame them when the tests determine, not only who is eligible to graduate high school but also which schools will receive the funding they need? Standardized tests may have had their place in the American school system fifty years ago, but today they are outdated, unreliable, and should be abolished as the main form of assessment in the public-school system.
First, Standardized tests help show teachers what they need to teach students. Throughout the years' standardized test that students take to follow the when they go to the next grade. By the test tracking students, it shows the teacher what they need the students to learn to get to the next level or get better. According to source B,"Standardized test also help show the students progress, growth, and what the students have learned. By showing the students progress and growth it helps determine if the student should go on to the next grade or stay behind. Theses things provide an accurate comparison between groups." This tells is that without these types of tests, it would be difficult to measure student achievement in different subjects.
First, standardized testing helps us to see growth of students. We can see growth as compared to other students and other countries. Students take the test more than once and it’s different every time. Growth can be seen from these tests throughout the year telling teachers what to teach.
By World War I, standardized testing was a common practice in the United States. It started with the Chinese, filling out tests to determine job status among the workers. During the industrial revolution, children left the farms and land to sit behind a desk, which caused the need to test a large amount of children quickly. The most common and well-known in our society are the SAT and ACT, which became a common rite of passage into universities in our society. There are many different views on standardized testing, creating a rift in our society, whether it has positive or negative impacts on our educational community and futures of children in our country.
Standardized testing has become a controversial topic in recent years, parents, students, teachers, principals and almost anyone who has a relationship with education is affected by this topic. People are either for or against standardized testing, some believe it is the only fair way to compare students others believe that the tests are too greatly stressed in school and are a nuisance to education. Standardized tests are stressed greatly, students learn testing material all year not focusing on anything else deemed unimportant by the test makers. Every student has the same amount of time and question on tests; they also are tested on the same subjects which the test makers believe are most important for children to learn. Standardized tests are used for many things such as ranking students on a national basis and government funding for schools.
A Teachingabout.com “Examining the Pros and Cons of Standardized Testing,” Standardized testing allows students located in various schools, districts, and even states to be compared. Without standardized testing, this comparison would not be possible. Public school students in the state of Texas are all required to take the same state standardized tests. This means that a student in Amarillo can be compared to a student in Dallas. Being able to accurately analyze data is invaluable and is a primary reason that the Common Core State Standards have been adopted in many states. These will allow for a more accurate comparison between states.Yes, standardized tests allow students around the world to compare their scores. Although Connectusfund.org “10 Big Advantages and Disadvantages of Standardized Testing,” The tests do not really assess skill as the questions have to be generalized for the entire population. In short, the test items are not in conjunction with classroom skills and behavior. What standardized tests do is assess the general knowledge and understanding of students rather than their actual ability. Now would we really like to make students miserable by making them suffer through standardized test. So ask yourself do really think that students should take such horrifying things like standardized
In various ways, standardized test are beneficial from tracking students’ progress over the years to not allowing teachers emotions to get in the way of the testing process. Standardized testing sets expectations high for students and it does hold them accountable for the same standards, which may lead to achievement gains. By looking at the students’ performance they will be able to determine how well they retain information. Also the school is able to learn what their students are able to do and what they cannot do compared to other school districts, so they would be able to improve their education system. When giving more personal assessments, it is very possible “that the teacher or person assessing the student can let their emotions or biases affect how they score that student” (Young). In most cases, standardized tests are objective. There are wrong or right answers, and there is no room for feelings or emotions. Standardized testing gives teachers guidance to help them determine what to teach students and when to teach it. Tests are highly accountable and reliable as they judge the candidates on a common platform across states and nations. Standardized testing is “a simplified way of timeline management” (A Look at the Pros and Cons of Standardized Testing). Standardized testing gives parents a good idea of how their children are doing as compared to students across the country and
If that is the case, why do schools believe all students test the same way? Giving every student the same test or almost the same tests is simply acknowledging that some the students are being set up to fail. If everyone is different than not everyone is going to test well on the same test setup. Some students need to be able to demonstrate themselves as a whole. Multiple choice formatted tests are an inadequate evaluation, " It encourages a simplistic way of thinking in which there are only right and wrong answers, which doesn't apply in real-world situations. The format is also biased toward male students, who studies have shown adapt more easily to the game-like point scoring of multiple-choice questions" (Sacks 3). The idea that giving all students the same multiple choice formatted tests is not as equal as it seems. Standardized test may boost IQ like abilities, but that does not mean they are as acceptable at placing students in courses and determining their college
. One source that supports this reason, "Standardized Tests Stress Students and System” by Arlo Kempf,
Teachers know what will be on the exams, therefore they only focus on preparing their students for those exams. Standardized tests often helps teachers strive to work harder on helping the students learn, so when the results come back, it reflects on if the teacher did a good job on teaching their
Ramey, a historian and teacher at the University of Pittsburgh (Strauss). She goes on to discuss the lack of knowledge on subjects when taking other forms of testing rather than a bubble sheet. It proves that standardized testing isn’t helping our education, rather it is helping us get better at testing a specific way. The real trouble comes when the student enters the real world and must show mastery of certain material. She elucidates on a few more issues such as added stress, and loss of the love for learning, but probably the biggest point Mrs. Ramey suggested is funding denial. If a school isn’t up to par with standard test scores they have their funding cut. This plan of action hurts the schools that cannot afford the SAT/ACT test prep books and the books where the information is covered. In short, the schools with less money get even less money, and student learning suffers even more. Most wouldn’t say that isn’t equal opportunity, rather it sets an even wider gap in education between poorer and well funded
First, I don’t think standardized test can enhance students’ learning abilities. To pass a standardized exam, one tends to focus on test-taking techniques and patterns of questions rather than obtain a thorough comprehension on the knowledge and skill. Consequently, students do not really master what they are taught. An evidence of the situation is that the US slipped from 18th in the world in
To begin with standardized testing creates several critical problems for students and for the education industry. These tests are created to test over particular things. In the end these types of tests are only limited in the amount of knowledge that can be tested toward students. For example, “Standardized exams offer few opportunities to display the attributes of high-order thinking, such as analysis, synthesis, evaluation, and creativity.” (“Standardized Testing Has Serious Limitations”). Even though these tests are able to attack certain subjects at the core, they still leave out very valuable and critical information that all students should know. In