Standing up Against Injustice Essay

I interpreted it as King trying to get the clergymen to acknowledge these issues by viewing it from the blacks perspective. When a person is told to look at a situation from a point of view that differs from their own, it opens doors to new perspective and understanding. Also, most people tend to lead by emotion, possibly providing King’s desired outcome of understanding and action.

To understand King’s views on nonviolent protest, I will start by summarizing some of the main points in his “Letter from Birmingham jail”. In spite of the fact that the "Letter” is verifiably worried with justice all through, King likewise addresses the question specifically at a few focuses. In actuality, he places that justice maintains the poise of the human soul, while injustice conflicts with it. By talking about this idea by and large, he builds up criteria by which to obscurely assault both segregation and silence it. He at last suggests that the man who sees injustice and does nothing to stop it is acting unjustly also. Taking after this thought, he contends that laws must be permeated with an ethical sense so as to be just; as such, law and morality can not be viewed as independent interests or areas. The best way to really enact change and help humankind rise above its confinements is to act with as well as grasp “extremism”. According to Mott, “That this action had been termed “extreme” King admits “initially disappointed” him.” But King decides that if loyalty to good principles

King understands where blacks are coming from in wanted equal rights. King sees the injustices of the black communities and is very involved in black movements which what what put him in jail. By being African American as well as witnessing injustices, King has firsthand knowledge which establishes his authority to speak on this issue of racial equality. King shows the audience that he is competent by stating that he is the President of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference. This helps show his strength of leadership in the religious community. This also again shows his competency to speak on the issue of equal rights. He continues to establish empathy by stating how he normally doesn’t respond to criticism; however he chose to respond this time due to the “genuine good will” of the clergymen. That response in itself tells the clergymen that he and the clergyman are on the same playing field, one pastor to another. King showed the clergymen’s “good will” deserved a response which established trust. Creating an ethical appeal in a rhetorical piece is essential in persuading the audience to believe an authors argument.

6) however, like Gandhi, he encouraged the volunteers not to retaliate. Mandela spent 26 years and 8 months in jail as punishment for his protesting however, he felt that “no sacrifice was too great in the struggle for freedom” (Doc. 9). He spent time in jail with other protesters that all felt that “whatever sentences [they] received, even the death sentence… [their] deaths would not be in vain” (Doc. 9). Freedom for the South African people from apartheid finally came in 1993. To Mandela this was not just the freedom of his people but “the freedom of all people, black and white” (Doc. 12). “South Africa’s New Democracy” rose after years of continuous nonviolence from the populace.

At the time of writing, King wrote this letter because felt disappointed because the men of the cloth were criticizing him on his peaceful protest. King felt as if these men should support him because King’s purpose of trying to defeat segregation was based upon his church background. When writing this King tried to understand as to why the man of faith were going against what he practices. But while trying to understand

King made me consider several issues that I had not considered before. For example, he talked about the Israeli occupation of Palestinian, and how the Palestinians should not be forced out of their own territory. He also talked about the lack of humanity the United States exhibits by targeting parts of the middle east with air strikes, thus killing innocent children. He said that “a child in Pakistan is just as valuable as a child in America.” The way he described the troubles of the less fortunate was emotionally stirring, and because of the current lack of social justice, I now feel called to take action in the soon future.

To begin, King uses techniques of diction like antithesis and connotation to help get his message across to the clergymen. First, he develops antithesis to strengthen his purpose. King makes this stand out to the clergymen by putting words together such as, "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere,"and “...freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed,”so they take notice wording. (282, 284) King wants this to stand out for the clergymen and notice the opposite meanings. This helps bring attention to the opposite words being placed together to get across Drawing the clergymen to pay closer attention It builds on what he truly wants to get across. King uses the words “never” and “must” to build emotional appeals with the clergymen, but also have them have a sense of what is going through his mind, when he is protesting willing in the streets of Birmingham. He wants to make them see truly the effects the African Americans have gone through either segregation and make them realize how they are at fault for continuing to support this behavior and not help out. “Injustice” and “Justice” help force the clergymen to take notice of the powerful association and have them think over it. It stands out as they read the letter, but also makes them think over it as they continue reading. The phrase makes the clergymen wonder if what

“Racism is a bad thing, you find it everywhere in the schools, the clubs and also in the streets.”

A Critical Analysis of The Divide: American Injustice in the Age of the Wealth Gap

When King gets up there to speak, he knows that he is fighting and uphill battle and the only way to persevere is with the power of numbers. King does what not many can do through the power of speech, he makes a nation realize that there is know true constraint holding them back from making change for the better of their great nation. King uses multiple metaphors in his speech to connect with the audience and create and emotional bond, one that they can relate to, a bond that unifies the masses to feel and understand what King is

King continues to say that some of the preachers of God have understood the need for justice, but some have suppressed the blacks themselves. He believes that the preachers have to break the traditional, unjustified rules of the society to allow for the freedom of the children of God. The true meaning of the Bible lies in justice and co-existence. He wants moral justice to overcome the traditional norms which were unjust in nature. He conveys this message well in his letter. He further writes: “One day the South will know that when these disinherited children of God sat down at lunch counters, they were in reality standing up for what is best in the American dream and for the most sacred values in our Judaeo-Christian heritage” (King 6).

King demonstrates how his peaceful, non-violent protests do not advocate violence, which is exactly what the clergymen feared from Malcolm. Kings intensity and magnitude of his statements show that he believes both paths he mentions are wrong, as he states, “I have tried to stand between these two forces.” King attempts to stay between the extremes and remind people that he is the middle ground. King emphasizes that he is not an extremist, rather, he is a moderate attempting to find the most favorable solution to both his and the clergymen’s problems. In conclusion, King juxtaposes these two extremist views in order to demonstrate how his practical and non-violent protests should be encouraged.

In his letter to the clergy he justified the use of ‘nonviolent direct action’ as tactical means to bringing parties together to negotiate. He vehemently condemned all forms of violent action but insisted that it was strategic and constructive to employ the nonviolent tension as a powerful alternate to negotiation. Similarly, Dr. King Jr. stressed to his audience in his momentous speech in Washington DC, that the desire to attain set goal must not be tainted by any acts of retaliation and cautioned the crowd to avoid the temptation of being ‘guilty of wrong doing”. He emphasized the importance of adhering to strict discipline and conducting their struggle in the highest form of respect for human dignity.

Amidst the seas of stereotypes, it can be difficult to sort out what is rude, polite, or appropriate. Some groups have been staunchly defending what is "politically correct," at times to the point of being inconsiderate themselves. I find the assertiveness of such people to be detrimental to their cause as well as a nuisance to the very people they are trying to defend, as not everyone with a minority disadvantage will agree with an SJW's (or "social justice warrior") approach. Various regional, cultural, and dialectal differences across communities convolute the situation even further. Because of that, I often ignore the ramblings of feminists and gender identity activists when their messages of overgeneralized stereotype-breaking become hateful

He shows them that he knows what needs to be done and what needs to happen to make their current circumstances better by using powerful words and comparisons that relate to them and their grievances and show that he stands with them in these times of hurt and will be their leader and one to console them. He uses these words, “And so today, you do not walk alone.” (King) to emphasize that even in an event that had no relation to him, he will be there for the families and community to help them rally around this terrible event and lead them into brighter days ahead. King shows that he is an avid leader and can use his words to unite people around him for better good. His words relate to the audience so well and he uses change of tone in his voice to relay the importance of what he is saying. His words get stronger, and louder as he touches on more important subjects of his speech. He is a wizard of using speech devices to emphasize his