Stanford Prison Study: Real Life Of Prison

Most individuals with authority will likely abuse their power. Such as demonstrated in the Stanford Prison experiment, where participants played the role of guards and prison in a mock-prison. This experiment was supposed to last two weeks but only lasted six days because the guards were buying abusive and the prisoners became anxious and highly stressed. Also, in this experiment, the man who conducted this experiment lost side track of the purpose of the experiment and that it is not an actual prison. Although, the experiment was just an experiment, the individuals who were the guards loss awareness of that and abuse their positions as guards. These individuals we don’t know how their characteristics, nor their personalities. We know they comply their behavior to fit the role of a guard. We can see this in the Flint water crisis since the people in positions that they need to protect the well- being of their people just as the guards who purpose is to maintain order in the prison not abuse the prisoners. We assume people in authority didn’t want to harm any individuals purposely. People with positions with authority, such as the governor of the state didn’t want to say one of the city

This study investigated the effects gender roles and the acceptance of dominant positions. Participants of the study were college-aged students. These students volunteered, and from there were chosen to participate in the reconstruction of the Stanford Prison Experiment, headed by Philip Zimbardo in 1971. In this experiment male students were arrested and then imprisoned in an underground make-shift prison at Stanford University. The participants were categorized into two sections, prisoners and guards. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of roles and the behaviors of the individuals engrossed in their positions. As expected, the men did comply to their occupying positions, surprisingly, their actions were stronger than predicted; the reality of the experiment altered the mindset of the participants forgetting their true roles in society. The guards became dominant, ruthless and controlling. Physical punishment and degrading actions were common with guards against inmate contact. The false reality of the experiment got so intense they were forced to shut down the experiment early to prevent any further emotional

The Stanford prison experiment (SPE) was study organized by Philip George Zimbardo who was a professor at Stanford University. Basically, SPE was a study of psychological effect. He studied about how personality and environment of a person effect his behaviour. Experiment he performed was based on prison and life of guards. He wants to find out whether personality get innovated in person according to given environment (situational) or due to their vicious personalities that is violent behaviour (dispositional). The place where the whole experiment was set up Philip Zimbardo and his team was Stanford University on August 14Th to August 20th in the year 1971 (Wikipedia).

In Maria Konnikova’s “The Real Lesson of the Stanford Prison Experiment” she reveals what she believes to be the reality of sociologist Philip Zimbardo’s controversial study: its participants were not “regular” people.

The United States prison system struggles eminently with keeping offenders out of prison after being released. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, more than third of all prisoners who were arrested within five years of released were arrested within six months after release, with more than half arrested by the end of the year (Hughes, Wilson, & Beck, 2001). Among prisoners released in 2005 in 23 states with available data on inmates returned to prison, about half (55 percent) had either a parole or probation violation or an arrest for a new offense within three years that led to imprisonment (Durose, Cooper, & Snyder, 2014). Why are there many ex-offenders going back to prison within the first five years of release? Are there not enough resources to help offenders before or/and after being released from prison.

Zimbardo implies the reason there are negative attitudes in prisons is because of the authority figures in the prison rather than the inmates themselves (although to some extent they do play a part in the aggression).

The year was 1971 and an experiment that has not been replicated since was concluded early on the campus of Stanford University. A total of twenty-four mentally stable college students participated in this groundbreaking psychology study. The study involved some students to play a role as mock prison guards and the rest of the participants became the inmates. The study was designed to be realistic with the local police “arresting” the inmates followed by issuing an inmate identification number, uniform, and being deloused. A mock prison was setup in the basement of psychology department on the campus.

1. What was the point of the study? The Stanford prison experiment answered the question that has plagued humanity since the beginning of time. Which one will prevail, good or evil?

I came to an denouement that the people that was in charge of this organization was setting the kids up not only failure but turning them into criminals slowly but surely. At first it was all fun & games until the guards started abusing their authority then that’s when the experiment quickly went left.

I have studied the Stanford prison study before in a criminal justice class, I believe in ethics. I find the study to be disturbing, especially when it was only for six days. I understand that it was a study, but everyone had an idea that it wasn’t a typical setting and that they hadn’t really done anything wrong. I was a cop in the military and I found it to be over the top. I have been in many situations where I had to be in charge over others, and I never, ever, behaved badly. I have always been fair and I have never felt I was entitled to act a certain way because of my given role. I do feel people have a higher degree of responsibility when they are in a role of authority over someone, and that should not be abused. If you find

Obedience is a social influence where an individual acts in response to a direct order from another individual. It is expected that without such an order the person would not have acted in this way. Obedience occurs when you are told to do something usually by an authority figure. Obedience involves a hierarchy of power/status. Therefore, the person giving the order has a higher status than the person receiving the order. Conformity happens through social pressure, which is usually because of the “norms” of the majority. You often know conformity as of someone who conforms to fit in. In the Wave and the Stanford Prison Experiment, these two social experiments have gathered important data on humane behavior. The social forces of obedience,

After reviewing a plethora of disorder, it is easy to say that obsessive-compulsive disorder has to be one of the most challenging disorders. Now, the reasoning behind this opinion is because people who suffer from this disorder no longer are in control of their lives as the routines and actions tend to take control. Additionally, the most disheartening part of this disorder has to be knowing that the need for the ritual is nonexistent. However, if the person does not complete their routine exactly as prescribed, they can have a mental breakdown because of the overwhelming anxiety. Now, the way society can help individuals who have this disorder is through buddy conditioning. For example, say a person has a problem with repeatedly checking locks a friend, family member, or coworker could stop them from giving into the impulse by ensuring

On the quiet Sunday morning of August 17th, 1917, in the Silicon Valley, North California, police officers arrested nine polite, upstanding young men of the community, as their neighbors watched in disbelief. They were put in handcuffs, directed into police cars and arrested on charges of armed robbery and burglary, for which they were not guilty. They were in fact not criminals, but paid participants in a study about the abuse of power in a prison context, orchestrated by the Stanford University psychology department. The prisoners and guards were assigned their roles and given little to no guidance on how to act. The guards felt privileged with their newfound power and entitled to use it as they saw fit. The situation rapidly deteriorated as the guards began to abuse their power. Naturally, the prisoners rioted against the abuse they were faced with and the guards resorted to excessive use of force to try and assert their authority and reestablish order. Consequently, some prisoners were released early due to their traumatic experience and as a result, the experiment was ended 8 days premature. The guards were infuriated and frustrated by the disobedience of the prisoners and so resorted to violence. The study may have left us more questions than it answered. Are we all capable of abandoning our morals as the guards did? How do we protect ourselves from the corrupting effects of power? To what extent does this made-up world reflect our own?

The process in which the prisoners were chosen and how the prison was set up were key

Designed and led by renowned psychologist Philip Zimbardo, the Stanford prison experiment in 1971 is a case study that illustrates the overriding power of the situation to transform good people into authoritarians and sadists (McLeod, 2016). The study illuminates the dark side of human nature, which can emerge under the right set of circumstances. This experiment is truly a classic psychology study and is best known for its realism which provided a setting that simulated the confinement of prisoners and guards. Throughout the experiment, Zimbardo implemented multiple research methodologies including primary and secondary research tools. In the beginning, the Stanford Psychology Department interviewed middle class, white males that were both physically and mentally healthy to pick.