Stanley Milgram Experiment Summary

The Milgram experiment is something interesting to test out, and also ethically wrong to do in my opinion. It’s interesting that Milgram wants to test out if people will be obedient to authority. He conducted a research by having the real subjects to

What would you do if your boss asked you to do something that inflicts pain on another human? Would you still do it? Keep in mind, if you did not comply you would be fired. This concept was studied by Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University. He composed an experiment focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. Stanley Milgram conducted this experiment because of his curiosity with World War II. Adolf Hitler gave orders to kill millions, and his army completed this cruel act of killing innocent people. Was it because of this concept obedience to authority? Even though obedience is being respectful there must be a point when obedience is to much, for instance killing someone is very immoral and the worst crime. When a boss or elder is asking you to injure someone else for a job, you should know that this is not a good job or it is not one you should partake in. Stanley Milgram conducted this experiment to figure out if we as humans were weak under peer pressure. Hitler was one man that was extremely powerful, one who has that amount of power can be consumed by the power and do wrong, because of the thought of wanting more and more. Once you have hit that point in your life you may want to be the best, which inturn means you do what you must to get to the top, even if that means asking people to do dirty work for you. Hitler did that exactly, he was very

The Milgram experiment was an experiment in which subjects volunteered to shock another “volunteer”. The subjects, also known as “teachers”, were escorted into a lab where they were introduced to another “volunteer”, alluded to as the “learner”. At this time the teachers also met the researcher. After meeting the experimenter and the learner, the volunteers were encouraged to shock the “learner” if he or she did not correctly restate the words. As the learner failed to correctly restate the words, the shock level would be increased.

where they had a man under cover and asked him questions. If he got the answer wrong he was

Stanley Milgram wanted to research how far individuals would go when harming another individual just to obey/follow instructions. Two participants were chosen and one was the learner and the other was the teacher. The learner was a confederate. The learner/confederate was taken to a separate room and hooked up to an electrode machine. The teacher was placed in another room with the researcher, and the teacher would read lists and every time the learner repeated the list back incorrectly, the learner would receive a shock. The learner/confederate gave wrong answers, and the level of the shocks increased each time. As the shocks appeared to increase, the learner would object. The aim was to see if the teacher would find the objections

The experiment undertaken by Stanley Milgram in 1963 was supposed to answer some questions about obedience and raised some questions and answered some. At the time, that Milgram underwent the experiment, a Nazi war criminal was being trialed. Milgram wanted this experiment to answer whether this Nazi criminal and his followers were just accomplices to Hitler during the Holocaust or did they have some responsibility to it as well.

In July 1961, Stanley Milgram began to conduct an experiment to test human obedience at Yale University. He wanted to see how German Nazis could inflict the extermination of the Jewish population, and to see how much pain they would inflict on another person just by giving instructions. Milgram put an ad in the newspaper and he got forty males volunteers between the ages of twenty and fifty. He would choose one of the volunteers and an actor who went by the name Mr. Wallace. They would draw a slip of paper which both said “Teacher”. The actor would say he got “Learner,” and the experiment would begin.

The Milgram experiment was a very famous study on obedience. The research was on everyday people and their compliance towards authority figures orders to inflict pain on others. Participants were instructed to give “fake” electric shocks to students, who are actually actors, learning memory tasks. They were instructed to give out electric shocks to the learners each time they gave a wrong response and would also move a level higher on the shock initiator each additional time an answer was incorrect. As the voltage level of these shocks increased, the students would pretend to cry out in pain, asking for it to stop. Some participants still increased shocks when this occurred, others hesitated and began asking questions. In our text it states

In many situations, there have been authority figures with mass followings. Often the power the leader holds over their followers can influence them to do negative things. Many people believe that they can be independent enough to resist any pressure put on them by an authoritative figure. If this was true, then why do genocides mark the pages of history books around the world? Stanley Milgram sought to answer this budding question. He used his scientific authority to conduct an experiment which would reveal that most people would succumb to authority and obey their commands. This contradicts what most people would like to believe about themselves and their morals. Although many people believe that they would never harm another human being, even under pressure from an authoritative figure, the Stanley Milgram Experiment proves that this is false. Most people would collapse under the pressure and obey any command given to them.

A Yale University psychologist named Stanley Milgram started a research experiment that investigated the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience (McLeod, 2007). This study was conducted in response to the Nuremburg Trials in Germany, as German officials had claimed they were just following orders that were given to them by their superiors. Milgram formulated the experiment so that it could answer the question: “Could it be that Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders? Could we call them all accomplices?" (Milgram, 1974). However, the objectives of this experiment were not achieved. The objectives were not achieved because the act of shocking a person cannot be compared to the genocide the Germans committed during WWII. Also, Milgram wanted to study whether the Germans were more obedient to authority figures, but he

All of the participants continued to at least 300 volts (McLeod). From the results, Milgram concluded that ordinary people are likely to follow the orders of an authority figure, even to the extent of killing an innocent human being (Velasquez). Milgram was intrigued by the results and wanted to further understand what caused the subjects to obey the “experimenter's” orders. He crafted up numerous ways to change the experiment including changing the location to a less prestigious place, swapping out the “experimenter” for someone dressed in ordinary clothes, removing the “experimenter” all together, and making the “student” be in the same room as the subject (McLeod). All of these changes dramatically reduced the obedience levels of the participants. From his final experiments, Milgram found that the more disconnected from the situation the subject felt, the further they would progress in the voltage levels

In Stanley Milgram 's essay Some Conditions of Obedience and Disobedience to Authority, the self-proclaimed "social psychologist" conducted a study while working as a psychologist at Yale University. The primary goal of Milgram 's experiment was to measure the desire of the participants to shock a learner in a controlled situation. The experiment was based on three primary roles: the authoritative figure, the learner, and the teachers. The authoritative figure instructed the teachers to shock the learner when they answered the question wrong. This form of punishment is typically believed to conflict with personal morals and the main reason for the experiment was to evaluate the teacher 's response to

Today, Milgram’s experiment would be conducted differently; prior approval of members of the institutional review board would ensure the rights of the individuals participating. The primary concern Milgram’s experiment was that the participants in the experiment were explicitly deceived, both about the nature of the study and about the reality of the electric shock. The procedure of Milgram’s experiment study would be considered unethical and would be not be approved by the standards upheld today. People involved in making the research focus on how to protect best the participants as well as a valid purpose of the study. Protective guidelines like the IRB and inform consent are made to ensure ethical research. An ethics panel must approve research

Milgram deceived his participants through vaguely informing them of the study therefore they weren’t aware of the true nature of the study. He also told them that they would be administering ‘real’ electric shocks to a ‘real’ participant therefore gauging an accurate reaction to the prods. Furthermore, he didn’t stick to his statement that they could withdraw at any time, making them forget that they have the ability to be defiant. Milgram also didn’t consider the long term effects that these participants may face after the study.

Milgram’s study was one meant to measure one’s level of obedience when being made to believe that the action they are being told to perform is causing harm to another person. The experimenters had the subjects come in to believe they were conducting a study on the effects of punishment on memory. The subjects were made to believe that they were randomly chosen between being a the “learner,” who received electric shocks, and the “teacher,” who delivered the electric shocks, however the experimenters rigged the draw so that all the learners were confederates in the study.