Stanley Milgram 's Psychology Of Obedience

The Milgram experiment was conducted in 1963 by Stanley Milgram in order to focus on the conflict between obedience to authority and to personal conscience. The experiment consisted of 40 males, aged between 20 and 50, and who’s jobs ranged from unskilled to professional. The roles of this experiment included a learner, teacher, and researcher. The participant was deemed the teacher and was in the same room as the researcher. The learner, who was also a paid actor, was put into the next room and strapped into an electric chair. The teacher administered a test to the learner, and for each question that was incorrect, the learner was to receive an electric shock by the teacher, increasing the level of shock each time. The shock generator ranged from

Stanley Milgram experiment bought forth the ultimate question in social psychology. How far away is someone go to confirm with society and be obedient to an authority to figure? It has been discovered though such experiments that people will obey orders, even if it inflicts harm on another individual. However, the same individuals were unwilling to inflict harm if it involved personal contact with the individual being harmed or even the sounds of pain and please from the individual being harmed.

The Milgram experiment was ethical, however there are issues within the experiment that may say that it was unethical. The ends of the experiment were to get results from those who were obedient while shocking the “learner” even under a stressful and complicated circumstances. In that time era, there wasn’t a strict control over the ethics of the experiments that had taken place. Today’s modern critics would never let this type of experiment happen if not all the variables were to be predicted before the commence of the experiment. Milgram wanted an answer if a person or group of people would obey even if they are hurting other humans in the process.

In 1961 The NSF, National Science Foundation, approved his proposal for his experiment. In the same year Milgram met his future wife Alexandra Menkin, who was both a social worker and a dancer. After being approved Milgram started his experiment in May of 1962, which was called the Milgram Experiment or the Milgram Obedience Experiment. The background of this experiment was inspired by the Jewish men, women and children who were victimized during the Holocaust. His overall question was would people do harm to others if they were told by someone of higher power or intellect to do it. The experiment included 40 male participants as the teachers. The experiment was set up in which there would be a teacher, normally the participant, and a learner, which was shown to be somebody but really was someone working with Milgram. Both participants were told that they were doing research to prove recent psychologist theories that a person learns things correctly when they are punished for making a mistake. Both the teacher and the learner are given a list of terms and words to associate with the terms. The teacher

Both Baumrind and Parker effectively wrote about how the Milgram experiment was like the holocaust and Nazi torture. Baumrind states that "the laboratory is unfamiliar as a setting and the rules of behavior ambiguous compared to a clinician's office"(90). This shows how people would react differently if they were in a familiar setting other than a lab. She goes on to explain how obedient suggestible manner is stronger in the lab than it would be elsewhere. In the article Milgram Experiment by Saul Mcleod he states that "Ordinary people are likely to follow orders given by authority figure, even to the extent of killing innocent human being" (Milgram experiment).

“Rules are for the obedience of fools and the guidance of wise men” Harry Day USAF. That’s a great way to look at obedience as guidance and not as a complete absolute, for when people do things without thought people will get hurt. The Milgram experiment is a showcase of what people will do if they do not have to take personal responsibility. Just because someone with all the trappings of authority and power tell us to do something does not mean what we are doing is right. The Milgram experiment showed psychologist that is wrong to subjugate test subjects without prior knowledge or consent. Furthermore, we now know that people are affected in both the short and long term from deception of testing, and some will never get over the fact that they were lied to.

The Milgram experiment illustrates people 's reluctance to confront those who abuse power. By recruiting and deceiving people of all different backgrounds, he manipulated them into using punishment on people’s ability to learn. The Milgram experiment helps psychologists and sociologists explain the reasoning behind knowingly conflicting pain for a certain outcome. Milgram contributed path-breaking experiments towards the research between obedience to authority. He furthered knowledge in social networks and urban psychology.

With this analysis of the observation, the results are consistent with the results from the Milgram experiment, finished 10 years earlier in 1961, which saw the behavior and willingness of ordinary people to fulfilled orders by an administrator, or an authority figure, even when what they were asked to do appeared to be agonizing to another participant, who unknown to those being studied was a paid actor. Even when participants felt uncomfortable with the continuation of the experiment, the scientist in the room urged them to continue in order to obtain conclusive result from the

The "Perils of Obedience" by Stanley Milgram details about the classic studies relating to obedience. The main study in focus is the Milgram’s Obedience study, conducted in the 1963 by the Yale University scientist Stanley Milgram. The experiment was designed by Milgram in such a way that participants are forced to obey the instructions of authority figure, even if they are immoral and also when such instructions cause pain/harm to another person. The participants selected for the experiment are ordinary people (Milgram, 630). The participants were willing to administer electric shocks to remaining people when ordered by authority figure. The Milgram experiment does not address the ethical concerns of testing and Jerry Burger of Santa Clara University, upon modifying the Milgram's setup found that situational factors result increased obedience in participants (Milgram, 631). The studies conducted by Burger and Milgram showed under a specific set of circumstances, the

(Carollo)The Milgram Experiment consisted of 3 participants: the teacher, the learner and the experimenter. The learner, unbeknownst to the teacher, was always an associate of Milgram. Participants were paired with Milgram’s associate and a lottery of sorts was used to determine who would be the teacher and learner. According to Saul McLeod, “The draw was fixed so that the participant was always the teacher, and the learner was Milgram’s associate (pretending to be a real participant.” (McLeod) Milgram found his participants through various advertisements. He only advertised for men 20 to 50 years old, as such, women were completely excluded from the

One conclusion is that most people are willing to do whatever an authority figure tells them to do. Most people believe that an authority figure probably knows more than they do so they are willing to do what authority figures say. Another important conclusion from his experiment is that people are easily deceived. They are willing to look past their own moral judgements and do what they are told to do. They believe in what an authority figure says even if it is not true. A third conclusion about human behavior is that there is no exact personality trait that is linked with defiance or obedience. This means that our view of authority is most likely learned through observational learning. It is engrained in children to listen to authority figures. Through school, work, and our parents people’s behavior toward authority figures are molded. Those are the three most important conclusions about human behavior that were gained through Milgram’s

The Milgram experiment was to test the power authority has on the common human being. Milgram performed the experiment with two individuals at a time. Two individuals show up for a study and are taken to a room where one is strapped in a chair to prevent movement and an electrode is placed on his

Before Milgram’s findings, the fact that people were inclined to obey to authority figures was already realized. He just confirmed this belief. Milgram followed effective steps by using precise procedures. He made sure that the experiment reflected features of an actual situation in which a person would obey to an authority figure: offering compensation (monetary reward in this experiment), being under pressure (Prods 1 to 4 in this case), and mentioning that the person who obeys can withdraw. These features can also be seen in a situation where a soldier is commanded to fire, for instance. A soldier will get a monetary compensation, is under pressure to obey because he chose to be part of the military, and he knows that he can resign at any time. Milgram created an experiment so precise and detailed that more than enough evidence was demonstrated.

The Milgram’s Experiment was an experiment to see how authority figures effects the way people obey conducted by Social psychology by the name Stanley Milgram this experiment was conducted in 1969. Milgram hired about 500 men between the ages of 20 and 50 from a newspaper ad he had placed. Milgram was looking for men that came from all walks in life. Milgram did not care if they were educated, uneducated, rich or poor he wanted them all. The men that were chosen to participate in the experiment were told that they would be paid 4.50 for one hour of their time if they participated in the experiment.

The Milgram experiment is probably one of the most well-known experiments of the psy-sciences. (De Vos, J. (2009). Stanley Milgram was a psychologist from Yale University. He conducted an experiment focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. Milgram wanted to investigate whether Germans were particularly obedient to authority figures as this was a common explanation for the Nazi killings in World War II. Milgram selected people for his experiment by newspaper advertising. He looked for male participants to take part in a study of learning at Yale University.