Stanley Tookie Williams: The Compassion Of The Death Penalty

According to a dozen recent studies an execution does save lives. For each inmate execution it is shown by studies that three to eighteen murders are prevented. By that it shows a big number that is getting prevented by murders.

Edward I. Koch uses his essay “The Death Penalty: Can It Ever Be Justified?” to defend capital punishment. He believes that justice for murderous crimes is essential for the success of the nation. The possibility of error is of no concern to Koch and if would-be murderers can be deterred from committing these heinous crimes, he feels the value of human life will be boosted and murder rates will consequently plummet (475-479). Koch makes a valiant effort to express these views, yet research contradicts his claims and a real look at his idea of justice must be considered in order to create a fair nation for all.

Throughout the history of man there has always existed a sort of rule pertaining to retribution for just and unjust acts. For the just came rewards, and for the unjust came punishments. This has been a law as old as time. One philosophy about the treatment of the unjust is most controversial in modern time and throughout our history; which is is the ethical decision of a death penalty. This controversial issue of punishment by death has been going on for centuries. It dates back to as early as 399 B.C.E., to when Socrates was forced to drink hemlock for his “corruption of the youth” and “impiety”.

Ever since the dawn of man’s search for justice, the death penalty, has been a consequence for particularly heinous crimes. Over the years society has debated whether the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment. People who oppose of the death penalty view supporters as gun-slinging "rednecks" who live in the backwoods of America. Likewise, supporters view those who oppose the death penalty as uptight "suits" who live in mansions and believes that every person, no matter their crime, deserves to live. Those who oppose the death penalty argue that life in prison is a preferable solution to the death penalty. The supporters of the death penalty argue that Hammurabi’s code, an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, a life for a life, is an

¨The taking of even one life is a momentous event.¨ (Bernardin, The Consistent Ethic of Life). The consistent ethic of life is founded on the belief that all life is sacred and worth protecting, while the reasons for capital punishment may seem similar-- retaliation for a life lost-- the death penalty directly goes against everything the consistent ethic of life teaches. As proven through these presentations, capital punishment cases are often inaccurate and biased, while the act of the Death Penalty has proven to be painful with many examples of botched executions. Not only is killing immoral, but how can we go through with these executions when evidence has shown the death penalty can be inefficient and some

Emmaleigh Elizabeth Barringer was a 10-month-old infant who was nearly dismantled and pronounced brain dead from a 32-year-old Benjamin Taylor in West Virginia who had viciously raped the infant. The 10 month old infant later died from her injuries. Which means that he must have assaulted the infant not only vaginally but anally causing the child’s organs to shut down and causing massive blood loss and trauma to the brain stem, she was pronounced brain dead after the crime, and later pronounced dead. West Virginia is one of 18 states in the union which do not have capital punishment. The Mountain State abolished the death penalty in 1965. That must be nice for the malicious infant rapist and murderer. Pleading temporary insanity nor life in

The death penalty has existed for several decades in the United States executing over 1,431 people since 1976, when the death penalty no longer violated the eighth amendment. Charles Brooks, a black male, aged 40, was executed in Texas in 1982, for the Murder of white male, David Gregory. Brooks was the first person to be executed by the use of lethal injection, since it had been reinstated in the United States. Since this first execution occurred, Americans have been debating on whether or not race plays a role in who lives, and who dies on death row. Despite all the anti-discrimination laws, the United States is faced with the challenge of racial tension and discrimination, which has a direct effect

Capital punishment has existed in the US since colonial times. Since then, more than 13,000 people have been legally executed. Today, there are only twelve states which do not have the death penalty: Alaska, Hawaii, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia and Wisconsin, as well as Washington D.C. The locations of these states are important because they illustrate the lack of ideological homogeneity usually associated with geographical regions of the US. The methods of execution are as varied as their locations. The word “capital” in capital punishment refers to a person’s head,

During the Eighteenth Century B.C., Hammurabi took place in office as the king of Babylon. He was one of the first kings to pass the law of death penalty that involved twenty- five different crimes (DPIC 2014). Also, let us not forget about the Hittite code, draconian code of Athens, and Roman law of the twelve tablets; which, led people to be crucified, hanged, electrified, and paid the price for others. In Britain, hanging became the only execution as of the Tenth Century A.D. However, Conqueror Williams do not approve of executing someone, unless in times of war (DPIC 2014). Unlike King Henry VII, who executed a total of seventy- two thousand people such as marrying a Jewish?

Everyone is innocent until proven guilty, but what happens when an innocent man is killed in regards to a crime he never committed? It’s a mistake that can never be corrected. Wilbert Coffin was sent to jail and then killed for being wrongfully convicted of murdering a man in 1953. The death penalty will not only kill the guilty, but the innocent as well. The death penalty is wrong.

In the article "The Case Against the Death Penalty," which shows up in Crime and Criminals: Opposing Viewpoints, Eric Freedman contends that capital punishment does not discourage fierce crime as well as conflicts with decreasing the crime rate. This essay will analyse Freedman 's article from the perspectives of a working man, a needy individual, and a government official.

Have you ever had the conversation, is it right to kill someone for punishment? Even though espionage, murder, and assault are all ruinous acts, the death penalty is necessary for us to keep law and order. Some major points on this are the history of death penalty, the facts of death penalty, and people's view on death penalty. Other countries have different methods of carrying out capital punishment than the United States of America. When the beheading of guillotine was introduced in France it was a way of executing traitors or using it as capital punishment (Issues and Controversies in American History).

   The law of God is, "Thou Shalt Not Kill" (Bible 79 ), and every system of ethics and rules of our society echoes that law. For decades, state and federal leaders have struggled with opposing views of the death penalty. Many minds have endured this difficult question-Who says it is right to take another human's life because of an act that he/she committed?

Are human species referred to as gods or merely mortal? Easily, the correct response to this inquiry is humans are, in reality, mortal and have no privilege on whether or not it is their obligation to proceed with an inhuman act relating to the death penalty. By defining the issue of authorizing the death penalty, it grants not only the execution team, but also the jury or judge, relying on the criminal case, to act upon as godly figures regarding the decision of one’s existence or demise. Given these points as to why capital punishment should be denounced, one will ultimately be persuaded that the death penalty is inhumane and should be an illegal practice.

Bright, Stephen B.: "The death penalty as the answer to crime: costly, counterproductive and corrupting"; 35 Santa Clara Law Review 1211 (1995)