Starbucks Financial Analysis Paper

i) Starbucks’ financial statements follow the accrual accounting model rather than cash-basis accounting. Companies who utilize cash-basis accounting methods only recognize revenue when received in cash and expenses are only recognized when paid in cash. Accrual accounting is the recognition of revenue when earned and the matching of expenses when incurred. Starbucks records revenue from 4 different sources: Company-operated stores, licensed stores, CPG foodservice and other revenues, and stored value cards.

2. Starbucks enjoyed strong financial performance in 2011. The company did not explicitly attribute this, but with an 8% rise in same store sales it seems that either the consumer market bounced back, or Starbucks made changes that attracted more consumers. The company feels that it offered better products and a better experience at its stores. The company also credited operating efficiencies and tight control of spending for improved profits. In addition, the company continued its global expansion, which improved the top line, and used the economies of scale it generated as part of its cost control program.

Financial statements provide users with information for evaluating an entity’s performance and financial status and thus help them to make informed decisions in their dealings with the entity. To assess these aspects, the users have various tools that they can employ. For instance, ratio analysis helps the users to detect any significant changes in an entity’s operating performance within a given period and thus indicate the risks and opportunities of the entity being reviewed (Helfert, 2001). Further, calculating ratios of companies in the same industry can help to highlight the companies that are performing below the industry average and thus help investors to choose the best company to choose from among alternatives. Apart from investors, ratio analysis can also help creditors evaluate a company’s liquidity and thus assess its ability to pay its debts on time (Helfert, 2001). Other ratios such as efficiency ratios can help managers to determine optimal uses of the entity’s assets and thus work towards enhancing efficiency. Apart from ratio analysis, horizontal analysis can also be used to reveal the trends of individual items in an entity’s income statement and balance sheet and thus help to unearth the items that may have affected the entity’s performance during a specific period. The horizontal analysis and ratio analysis of the financial statements of Starbucks Corporation that is the subject of this paper indicate that

KEVIN R. JOHNSON, 48, has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Juniper Networks, Inc., a leading provider of high-performance networking products and services, since September 2008.

The succeeding content of this executive summary provides an analysis on Starbucks’ Corporation profit using the company’s most three most recent annual reports. Team B uses “the information contained in the company’s balance sheet and income statement noting that annual reporting period and fiscal year mean year-end numbers. Additionally, included is the company history, audit for the company, stock exchange listing, cash and cash equivalents at the end of its 2 most annual reporting periods. Moreover, total current assets, largest current assets, company’s total assets at the end of its 2 most recent annual reporting years. Furthermore, accounts payable,

Starbucks is the premier corporation involved in the manufacturing and selling of tea and coffee (Starbucks Corp.). Starbucks Corporation is currently traded as common stock under NASDAQ-GS. Starbucks officially went public on June 26, 1992 at a price of $17 dollars later closing that same day at $21.50 per share (Starbucks Company Profile). Starbucks historical data indicates a decrease in stock price since April 2016. At the start of April, the stock price opened at 61.10 and the latest price index currently stands at 58.37 in April of 2017.

Starbucks financial statements were analyzed for the fiscal year ended September 27, 2015. Like all public companies, annual and quarterly financial statements are required to allow regulators and other interested parties to analyze the financial status and management decision making of the company. This analysis focuses on the results of Starbucks most recent published annual report containing their balance sheets, statement of earnings and cash flows. These statements will be analyzed against the results of one of its competitors, Dunkin Donuts, to investigate how the two companies compare to each other. It was noted that Starbucks and Dunkin Donuts do not have corresponding fiscal year ends. The data therefore is not directly comparable since the reports do not reflect the same time period of data but should provide additional insight. The paper will attempt to provide a brief analysis of Starbucks operations in terms of its liquidity, leverage, activity, profitability and growth ratios used by analysts in the industry.

Starbucks is known for their Frappuccino’s; unfortunately they are on a downward spiral in sales due to competitors such as McDonalds. In 2008 Starbucks admits to its losses due to their competitors. “Company executives now freely admit that such thinking is largely to blame for the woes that led to Tuesday’s announcement that Starbucks will close 600 U.S. stores and eliminate thousands of jobs. The coffee giant’s missteps have come at a spectacularly bad time, hitting as the economic slump deepens and consumers are seeing their discretionary spending eaten up by rising gas prices and grocery bills (Linn).”

When Howard Schultz launched Starbucks, its main targets were the competitors and the customers. Schultz’s brand aimed at gaining dominance in the coffee industry in addition creating a Italian coffee shop feel in the United States (Buchanan & Simmons, 2009). The strategy of Starbucks was based on new products, listening to customers wants and ensure future expansion (Buchanan & Simmons, 2009). In creating convenience for customers, Starbucks created stores almost on top of eachother. They hinged on the idea that, they did not want to lose out on a sale if a line was too long. This action, of placing stores in heavy populated areas, basing need on projected growth of an area caused some decline in sales during economic trouble with the economy. The 2007 recession, failure of subprime mortgages, increased competition from McDonald 's McCafe brand, and Dunkin Doughnuts all led to a decline in sales for Starbucks in the fourth quarter of 2007 (Buchanan & Simmons, 2009). To attempt to regain market share and recover after the

Price earnings (P/E) ratio is considered to be the most valuable tool for investors in determining which stock investments from comparable industry will most likely yield higher growth earnings in the future. Price earnings ratio is calculated by dividing the company’s price per share by its earnings per share (Yahoo Finance, 2015). The higher the ratio, the better because investors can use this ratio as an indicator of how well a company will do in the future. The objective of this paper is to help analyze and assess the P/E ratio of Starbucks and its two major competitors, McDonalds and Dunkin’ Donuts. Below are the comparable data of Starbucks and its

Starbucks generates strong cash flows has solid liquidity. The company executes rigorous cost cutting initiatives to improve its bottom-line. However, throughout fiscal 2008, Starbucks continued to experience declining revenue, particularly in US operation. The decline is largely attributed to lower customer traffic.

Starbucks is undoubtedly an international brand. The history of coffee traces back to Ethiopia, Africa, India, Arabia, and Europe, and has been traded abroad since the 11th century. Understanding the demand and widespread market for coffee, Starbucks has triumphantly capitalized both the domestic market, and the varied international markets as well. Possessing about 6,500 retail sites worldwide, Starbucks’ net is spread across thirty countries and has been found as one of the most recognized brands all over the globe in equality to McDonalds and Toyota. This organization’s ability to build an international brand has been unprecedented- particularly since it represents a specialty

The company that I am writing about is Starbucks, the international coffee shop chain. The company's financial statements for this analysis are from the FY2011 Annual Report and 10-K. The company has 10787 stores in the United States, of which 38% are franchised and the remainder are company-owned. The franchise model is more common when the company operates internationally. There are 6216 Starbucks stores internationally and of these 63% are franchises, with just 37% company-owned. The franchise model for international expansion has been utilized to help Starbucks expand quickly in foreign countries and to mitigate foreign political risk and to ensure that the product/service offering is tailored to local tastes (Thompson, 2012). The company is now in the process of buying back some overseas franchise stores in order to retain more profits for itself (Franchise Press, 2011). This paper will take a look at the company's most recent annual report to analyze the financial statements.

In general the coffeehouse industry in the United States was experiencing an increase in coffee consumption per capita due to the “Starbucks effect”. At this time Starbucks was operating approximately 20,000 stores in the United States and was living a fast expansion strategy worldwide.

The next exhibits show payroll structure and income volume per location in 2002 and product mix for North American company-operated stores. Exhibit 6 shows US retail coffee market predictions till 2005 years. It clearly shows changing in Americans’ coffee drinking style into specialty coffee. It is very important for Starbucks because company’s main market is specialty coffee. Next of the exhibits, shows positive customer snapshot scores for North America stores. Those snapshots suggest further company’s success. The only issue we can find is the product quality. According to the exhibit product quality went down during 3rd quarter of 2002.