Essay on Stark P M4 A2

Love is unique in its striking ability to be a driving force in dictating interpersonal relationships. It patterns behavior and orients individuals towards their distinct, unique attractions. According to Velleman, love penetrates deeper than one’s qualities; it extends to one’s rational will, or the essence of a person. To him, though love appears to have particularity, it is also a moral emotion. Kolodny subscribes to the relationship theory, asserting that an ongoing, interpersonal, and historical relationship with a relative is a part of the reason for love. In Kolodny’s view, the existence of the true self is irrelevant, as is the morality of love. Both Velleman and Kolodny disprove the quality theory; however, their perceptions of love and its morality differ. I believe that Kolodny is correct in his view that morality is irrelevant to love and that there must be factual reasons for love. Although it is enticing to believe that one is attracted to the essence of another, the essence is not motivation enough for love. The relationship theory takes into account the motivation needed to love a particular person from a historical, interpersonal, and ongoing perspective.

Robert Sternberg created his triangular theory of love based on three dimensions: passion, intimacy, and commitment. The degree to which a relationship demonstrates these three dimensions determines the type of love relationship. People begin love relationships with those who care for them as children. These early relationships can have a great effect on their adult relationships.

Based on the intimacy component in the triangular theory of love the couple Hong Shun and Sheryl The second component in the triangular theory of love is passion. The passion component refers to the drives that lead to romance, physical attraction, sexual consummation, and related phenomena in loving relationships. The passion component thus includes within its purview those sources of motivational and other forms of arousal that lead to the experience of passion in a loving relationship (Robert J. Steinberg n.d.). According to the passion in the triangular theory of love, we can see that the couple Hong Shun and Sheryl The last component in the triangular theory of love is commitment. The commitment component refers to, in the short term, the decision that one loves someone else, and in the long term, the commitment to maintain that love. The commitment component thus includes within its purview the cognitive elements that are involved in decision making about the existence of and potential long-term commitment to a loving relationship (Robert J. Steinberg n.d.). Based on the commitment component, we can conclude that the couple Hong Shun and Sheryl, does not have much commitment to their

Through the Selections from Love 2.0: How Our Supreme Emotion Affects Everything We Feel, Think, Do, and Become, Barbara Fredrickson presents a new and scientific definition of love, one that supports love as something directly connected to the body, rather than the belief that love stems from the relationships people have with close ones. To Fredrickson, the relationships that

Their love-at-first-sight relationship also lacks a strong foundation to overcome challenges. Applying Robert Sternberg’s triangular theory of love, Ray and Jane’s form of love is Romantic Love (intimacy + passion). In their first meeting, they feel attracted to one another. Eventually intimacy grows and they start dating. The process is filled with passion. However, Ray is not ready for commitment. He never has a clear cut with Diane. Jane feels unsafe and uncertain as the triangular relationship continues. The bond between Ray and Jane gets weaker day by day, such that any quarrels can break it easily.

Interpersonal relationships are social associations, connections, or affiliations between two or more people. Within these types of relationships comes a romantic aspect that includes six different love styles: eros, ludus, storge, pragma, mania, and agape. These love styles were orginially developed by John Lee in 1973 and then further expanded by Clyde and Susan Hendrick of Texas Tech University throughout the mid 1980’s. All six love styles are significantly different but everyone has experienced atleast one throughout their life. In my case, I’ve experienced all six at one point or another in my life. These models of how people love indicate the different ways of showing affection and or receiving it.

According to Sternberg, the theories were separated, the triangular theory of love and the theory of love as a story. Love can be understood in three components that can form a triangle. Each of the components manifests different aspect of love. In my own words, this theory is using intimacy, passion, and commitment as the three main points because this is three words that each relationship, friendship should exercise. My boyfriend Jakob and I have known each other for a total of two years now. We began dating November of 2016. We had a love for one another starting off as friends, but it never really felt like a friendship; it felt like so much more. In this paper I will share real experiences in my relationship I am in currently and

As Sternberg has came up with the theory of the three types of relationship that develops in early adult relationships. This is to argue that consummate love is the type of love that can make a relationship last for long, this is because this type of love has all the three types of love in a triangle, which are passion, intimacy and commitment and it is the strongest and the lasting type of love (Louw, Ede & Louw, 2008). This means that in this love there is physical and sexual attraction, emotional feelings and sharing, and also the intention to maintain the close relationship even though there are problems(Louw et al.,2008).

Many psychologist tried to analyse the process of romantic love. One of them was Fisher, an anthrpologist who used brain scans which showed that love is a chemical reaction of norepinephrine and dopamine and other brain chemicals in different regions of the brain that are responsible for excitement and bliss in humans as well as in some other animal species. Fisher suggested that love is a natural drive and as powerful as hunger (Fisher, 2004). Psychologist Bessell proposed that people in love are drawn together by a force that he called ‘romantic attraction’. This romantic attraction however is a combination of genetic and cultural factors and this force may be weak, strong or felt to different degrees by each of two partners. Bessell found another factor that is important for providing a good relationship that is ‘emotional maturity’ a one’s capability to provide a stable love relationship (Bessell, 1984). Love is a universally pattern of human mate preferences, that should be and was free-choice at least to some extent throughout human evolutionary history as Buss & Schmitt (1993)

The feeling of love is, deep, soft, satisfying. Because of its affectionate and intimate nature it is viewed by some as an inapplicable topic for experimental research. But, whatever our own perception may be, our assigned mission as psychologists is to analyze all facets of human and animal behavior into their component variables. (scientific American , June 1959) Therefore as far as love or affection is concerned, psychologists have been unsuccessful in this quest. The few things we know about love don’t go beyond simple examination, and the few things we read about it

On one side, this theory explains the motivation in the development of close relationship. People will continue to one relationship only if they feel it is a rewarding one and can bring them growth

Although there are many theories of love, the conceptualization that captured attention of interpersonal researchers and continues to receive research support is a model proposing that there are not one but six types of love (Lee, 1976; Kanemasa, Taniguchi, Daibo & Ishimori, 2004). Eros: beauty and sexuality, like narcissus that fell in love with the beauty of his own image, the erotic lover focuses on beauty and physical attractiveness. Ludus: entertainment and excitement, love is experienced as a game, as fun. Storage: peaceful and slow, lacks passion and intensity. Pragma: practical and traditional, practical and seeks a relationship that will work. Mania: elation and depression, characterized by extreme highs and extreme lows. Agape: compassionate and selfless, egoless, self-giving love. Depending on which one is the type of love relationship you have you can have the power in the relationship. The type of love relationship we have can be influenced by culture, gender, and technology.

Love is an unbreakable bond that keeps a drive of compassion in all of our hearts. Love is a necessity, and while it may also be considered a luxury, sometimes it is overlooked, or written off as impracticable. Everyone seeks the feeling and situation to love and be loved in return. This is a topic of controversy all over the world and throughout every relationship. The topic lends itself to many social psychological phenomena. The argument of what love might be is comprised of having much to do with an attractive pull between two individuals. Society has adapted to the pulls of trending and attraction of circumstances.

Robert J. Sternberg, psychologist and Sciences proposed a triangular theory of love that suggests that there are three components of love: intimacy, passion, and commitment. Different combinations of these three components result in different types of love. For example, a mixture of intimacy and commitment results in compassionate love, while a mixture of passion and intimacy leads to passionate love. Sternberg often said, relationships built on two or more elements are more enduring than those based upon a single component. Sternberg uses the term consummate love to describe a combination of intimacy, passion, and commitment. While this type of love is the strongest and most enduring, Sternberg suggests that this type of love is rare. He wrote that even as a teenager he was intrigued by the mystery of why some relationships succeed while others fail. This is why early in his academic career he developed an explanation, which he calls the “triangular theory of love.” His theory is based on the observation “that love consists of three components intimacy, passion, and commitment. Different combinations and strengths of those three ingredients,” Sternberg says, produce different kinds of love.

Many people argue that romance is a cliché. It seems like in nearly every aspect of our culture, love has been defined, redefined, misunderstood, denied or accepted. It includes happiness, sadness, and everything else in the world. But each person experiences love in their own terms. David H. Knox is the author that wrote the article “Conceptions of Love at Three Developmental Levels”. He confirms, “Love is an experience which most have had or expect to have. Indeed, American culture teaches that, Love is the greatest thing. It is an experience to be sought, and when achieved, to be cherished” (Knox 1). Knox suggested that everybody has their own experience about love. Love is so unique and complex that no two people experience it in the same capacity. Therefore, the word "love" is insufficient for conveying the nature of people’s feelings towards a beloved. It