State Government Vs Federal Government Analysis

In the past, the Congress and the House have forced the state governments to meet in certain enviromental standards. (Sparknotes Editors, Federalism, page 2)

The U.S Constitution is the oldest and shortest constitution of any major government in the world. The three main functions of which are creating a national government consisting of a legislative, executive, and judicial branch, with a system of checks between the three branches. It protects various individual liberties of American citizens while also dividing power between the federal government and the states. Article IV enumerates relationships between the state and federal government and also relationships between states. Hence understanding article IV is important to understanding the function of state and local governments.

The relationship between States and their localities in many cases is strained. State government gives their local governments life, they create the laws for them. However, throughout history, state governments have not treated their localities as they suppose to. That is why the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) stated on the state-local relation “Legislators should place a higher priority on state-local issues than has been done in the past. The time has come to change their attitude toward local governments.” They want the state governments to see localities as partners in the federal system.

There are a variety of differences and similarities between federal, state, and local governments. This includes, but is not limited to, the responsibilities, size, and staff of the administration. The machinery of government is intended to better the quality of citizen’s lives. Ultimately, federal, state, and local governments were established to work together in bettering programs and laws (Berkley & Rouse, 2009, p.32).

The federal government and state governments have had a long history of powers struggles. The struggle goes back and forth between who has the right to make decisions and if there is a problem who should fix it. Sometimes it is better for the federal government to fix issues and during other situations it is better for the state or local governments to fix other issues. In the PBS special of the United States Constitution, Peter Sagal travels around the states documenting the various roles and impact the government has on the country as a whole and on the individual states.

The relationship between the Federal government and the states is well stable. The Federal government has powers given by the Constitution as well powers or privileges are given to the states which promotes a balance between the two so that our country is not ruled under one specific party or group. The question now is that, are the states rights more than well protected in the current constitution and the political practice.

A philosopher named Thomas Hobbes believed that the main purpose of government was order. Thomas Hobbes today would support a monarchy such as Trump. His view of human nature led him to see people as being born selfish, driven by their desires, and acting upon disputes as sovereign people would. This led him to perceive a government best ruled by one. One of his arguments stated that because people living in a never-ending war between each citizen, “every man against every man”, provided Hobbes to assume that people would be in search of a ruler who could provide peace and stability. In Hobbes’s

These intellectuals attempted to generate an explanation for the purpose of government and expressed their ideal political structure to find a solution to the inequalities in the distribution of power. The changing intellectual and social perceptions of the human condition led to new insights and questions of the way in which humans were ruled: “Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains.” (Rousseau 2). This conveys The Philosophe belief that liberty is lost when political rule is too strict, to the point where one is unable to truly live. John Locke deduced in his two Treatises on Government that humans have natural born rights to life, liberty and property (“Hobbes, Locke, Montesquieu and Rousseau on Government”). His ideal government protected these natural rights and permitted the freedom of its people to conduct their lives in a way that they see as best fit. He believed that the government existed to serve the people’s will, thus the power laid in the majority (“Hobbes, Locke, Montesquieu and Rousseau on Government”). Thomas Hobbes had an opposing view to that of Locke’s government. Hobbes advocated for the monarchy and absolutism, as this form provides strong political stability (Elahi 2). He believed that the people were indebted to the government and protected by the ruler, only if they surrendered their rights and freedoms under a social contract (Elahi 3). Jean

The United States Environmental Protection Agency or EPA was initially proposed in 1970 by then President Richard Nixon. The agency was created to build on other environmental regulations enacted by the federal government and to consolidate those efforts to be managed by one government agency. It was also a reaction to the public’s growing concern over pollution and other environmental issues. Chemical waste was commonly released into bodies of water creating unsafe drinking water and rivers catching fire. Industrial air pollution, such as acid rain and smog, was also affecting manufacturing cities with coal-powered plants. There was little serious regulation on pollution until major environment laws started being passed by Congress in the early sixties.

The national or federal environmental administration asks their states to help maintain a safe and clean environment for all of its’ people to enjoy. The National Environmental Policy Act or also known as NEPA was established in 1969 to aid federal agencies to help convey the message for the need to protect the environment. “Federal agencies are required to systematically assess the environmental impacts of their proposed actions and consider alternative ways of accomplishing their missions, which are less damaging to and protective of the environment” (U.S. General Services Administration). Even though the National Environmental Policy Act “requires” federal agencies to ensure states to follow through, Texas has not fully committed to the requirement. “Texas contains an abundance of natural resources, but efforts to impost environmental regulations have faced roadblocks for many decades” (The Texas Tribune). Texas has neglected to keep the environment’s safety in mind and thought of only the business boom. The natural resources found on the land of Texas represents a magnet that attracts people. Texas desires to continue the attraction of people into the state as it is allowing the state to flourish in economic matters. During the past few decades, “From 1970 and 1980, as oil prices spiraled upward and people flocked to Texas,” (Petersen and Assanie) there has been little attempt made in conserving

The Clean Air Act is a United States federal law designed to control air pollution on a national level.[1] It is one of the United States' first and most influential modern environmental laws, and one of the most comprehensive air quality laws in the world.[2][3] As with many other major U.S. federal environmental statutes, it is administered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in coordination with state, local, and tribal governments.[4] Its implementing regulations are codified at 40 C.F.R. Subchapter C, Parts 50-97.

Dual federalism, or “layer cake” as referred to in the Central Ideas in American Government textbook, took place in the middle of the New Deal. Overall, dual federalism established a relationship between the states and the federal government by clearly defining the areas of authority to avoid overlapping power. An event prompting this separation of power mentioned in Dr. Daron Shaw’s lecture is the case of McCulloch v. Maryland. Following the taxation of a bank located in the state, a court case took place that led to the reiteration of the Supremacy Clause, where power is given to national laws if a conflict takes place between the state and the federal government. Conversely, cooperative federalism came into place shortly after the Great

The Enlightenment was a time for new thinking and new ideas. Philosophers were challenging traditional beliefs, much to the dismay of the Church. Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were both great philosophers with equally great ideas, but these men had different views on how governments should be run and concepts of the Enlightenment. Both Hobbes and Locke had an equal impact on Western Civilization as we know it today. Thomas Hobbes was born premature on the fifth of April in 1588 in a town in England called Westport.

There are 10 regional offices of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) throughout the USA. The mission of the EPA is to protect human health and the environment. In addition to the regional offices, there are many labs across the USA that studies solutions to possible environmental issues. Once these solutions come into place they are brought to attention of both local and worldwide public administrators.

Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher and he believed that Government was something that the country needed. In his book Leviathan (1651). He described “life without government as life in a “state of nature””. (The Challenge of Democracy, 2015) Thomas Hobbes claimed that “In the state of nature, profit is the measure of right,” (People maybe more honest than psychologists thought, 2016). People saw him as a philosopher with an unclear view of human nature but he wanted us to imagine life with no government - no rules, how to visualize people having control, and where each person decides for themselves how to handle their own problems when a disagreement occurs and that this power is the correct starting point against the justifiably of political