State Terrorism As A Form Of Political Violence

Ever since 9/11 when both World Trade Center buildings were attacked by an Islamic Group, attacks by Islamic Terrorist on U.S. soil have been less of a threat than Domestic Terrorists. Domestic Terrorism has been shown these passed for years but yet again most of these cases have not been classified as acts of Domestic Terrorism they most likely fall into the category. Now the definition of Domestic Terrorism is basically "the committing of terrorist acts in the perpetrator 's own country against their fellow citizens". Now personally I don 't know how our government is working with these popular cases like Charlottesville, Las Vegas, and a new that just happened recently actually two but I 'll just say one, the New York attack that

To start with state terrorism is beginning to be used a lot in modern days because of all the

In Statecraft, from turn zero it was apparent terrorism was going to be a prevailing issue. In fact, only one nation, per the Bush Doctrine, was not a state sponsor of terror. An important element of the Bush doctrine was the lack of distinction between terrorist and anyone including the states who aid the terrorist. With terrorist surrounding my nation from the west and south supporting terrorist organizations, I advised our nation’s leader to adhere to the Bush doctrine. Unfortunately, my fake nation’s leader focused on other things such as recycling. After our leader continually ignored numerous warnings, our Capital and other cities were continually attacked by OLF and the Typhoon pirates. Not being President, all I could do was the minimal, and otherwise was forced to sit back and watch not only Elferians but the citizens of the entire Statecraft world lose their family and friends from terrorist attacks.

Terrorism from above is known as state terrorism, state terrorism is not always a straightforward process in fact it is usually a covert, secret policy that allows states to claim deniability when accused of sponsoring terrorism. There are several ways to spot terrorism from above and can be included many different aspects.

There are several different reasons why terrorists attack; so broad, that many people debate about the official definition of terrorism. However, terrorists are defined in typologies to help sort some of this definition conflict. Typologies focus on the social meanings behind terrorist tactics and violence.

This chapter was all about State terrorism and the different subtypes and examples. State Terrorism can be describe as; when the government is committed to using violence and extreme threats against their own civilians to get them to comply with the same views as the government to the point of submission. A country can involve in state terrorism with the aim of protecting the safety of its borders, guarding sovereignty or to achieving some political goal. The chapter breaks down state terrorism into two categories: internal and external terrorism. The first being internal terrorism, which is when the act occurs as a result against a domestic order, challenge to mainstream values, or internal human rights violation etc. A State may engage in terror acts for a variety of reasons. The main reason behind most state terror acts is to protect the sovereignty of the country. The government safeguards the independence and security of the country. This responsibility

Throughout the years , the United States has had several terrorist attacks from the inside the country and from outside the country. Other countries and even citizens of the United States have attacked the U.S. and devastated families throughout the country. Millions have died and even more have been injured from the attacks. It has taken the U.S. years to recuperate and rebuild . there have been terrorist attacks for thousands of years that have now come

Why does the way we define terrorism matter? It matters because we can make wrong judgements of a group or individual and not have a clear vision of what is in store in the future. In the article “The Struggle to Define Terrorism” it says that chaos is that describes the state of things concerning definitions (Tuman 2). Academics, government, experts all have different definitions of what terrorism is. Even a terrorist has a different definition of what the meaning of “terrorism” is.

The three most critical national security threats confronting the U.S. over the next five years include the following: terrorism and non-state violent groups, cybercrime, and climate change. While some of these threats present different challenges and ramifications, I believe that within the next five years, foreign-hatched and homegrown terror attacks on the U.S. homeland will remain the most——as it is currently—— imminent threats to U.S. national security. The next critical threat is cybercrime on the U.S. critical infrastructure and other facilities of security importance. The third is the primary and secondary effects of climate change. I examined these threats below.

In simpler terms, meaning that the state is using and supporting its terrorist groups to gain knowledge about something that could help or protect their political agenda. In example, it is believed that a lot of state-sponsored terrorism actively played a role in the Iran government when it was accused of supporting Shia militias in Iraq during its recent war with the United States under George W. Bush’s presidency. The United States was also accused of state-sponsored terrorism when they were in support of Cuban

According to political scientist Robert Pape, the PLO is an exemplary illustration of the efficacy of terrorism, providing a prototypical for why terrorism of all forms is a judicious strategy as an instrument of political influence . However, Pape dwindles to identify a defining characteristic of terrorism; the disconnect amongst a terrorist groups objectives and outcomes. As American philosopher Loren Lomasky has discerned, one of the most profound realities about terroristic activity is the magnitude between efficacy and aspiration. Lomasky also noted that virtually “none of the instances of terrorist activity is there any genuine prospect that the attack on person or property will aid to advance the claimed political ends” . Whilst the Palestinians

When discussing terrorism from a realism point a view, many do not believe realists have much to say on the topic since realists concerns focuses on state interaction and terrorists as some believe are transnational actors. While it may be easier to pick any other international theory, there are some aspects of realism that can explain terrorism and will be explained throughout this section. One, terrorism is not only a weapon used by non-state actors, regimes and governments use it against their own citizens, which end up involving other countries in the end. Two, policies that are enacted to counter terrorism affect how states interact within their countries and with each other. Three, while terrorist organizations may not have a physical state to operate from, they do many times have governments and justice systems set up as a service to the people, they create armies, they form allies, and they engage in warfare with legitimate states. There have been numerous times when a state has declared war on a terrorist organization. Terrorism like security demands a struggle for power. This makes terrorist organizations a serious threat to states and their security. Like states have struggled to for self- determination, gaining, and maintaining power, so does modern terrorists with the goal to establish their own state or replace one. This is true of Hamas a terrorist organization that has struggled for years to not only gain power but to establish a Palestinian State and holds

Non-state actors and terrorism in international relations are complicated subjects seeing it in different perspectives. Non-state actors see themselves as freedom fighters, whereas the victims see them as terrorists. There isn’t a solid definition on terrorism however, there are three different qualities that defines a terrorist. Violence is a quality that causes destruction of properties and murder within states. Targeting civilians is another quality that terrorist have because they use them to create examples to threaten state actors. Finally the most important quality out of all is political purposes because without it, it would be a group of sick people who slaughter other people out of pleasure. Non-states actors, and terrorism existed

For the countries that State Sponsor Terrorism (SST), the United States has several different ways it combats and handles these rogue nations, mostly through the use of sanctions. One country that has become a repeat offender of sponsoring terrorism is Iran. Since the 1979 Islamic revolution, Iran’s clerical leadership has worked with a range of terrorist groups to advance its own overall interests in the Middle East and abroad (Byman, #2, 2015, Pg.1).

Terrorism will be used to describe violent actions against groups of people or a nation, towards a political end, by non-state groups, for the purpose of this paper . With the focus will be on cross-broader terrorism rather than domestic terrorism. In regards to terrorist organisations, there is an unprecedented need for a continuous flow of funding and the need for the immediate transfer of these funds internationally. Funding is of paramount importance to terrorist groups in order for them to carry out violent and horrific attacks on civilians of a foreign nation. The restriction of the source and the transfer of these funds is as effective, in the reduction of terrorism, as police actions . Therefore, the interception, monitoring and control of terrorist financing is crucial to resisting terror. However, it is immensely difficult to detect and timely report the financial transactions on an international scale and to hinder terrorist groups and its supporters from accessing international financial markets . This dissertation aims at exploring these problem from the viewpoint of financial regulations.