State Testing Mandatory

Grant Wiggin’s article, “Why We Should Stop Bashing State Tests” offers an extensive look into state testing and how we need to teach a greater understanding, how it would improve test scores miraculously in addition to not threaten them in any way. Wiggin’s writes this article from a perspective that says he cares about what students need to learn not only to pass these tests, nevertheless also to present them the necessary skills in life to succeed. “Standardized tests can give us surprisingly valuable and counterintuitive insights into what students are not learning.” He communicates an understanding into the world of teachers being reviewed for even thinking of looking at the tests before

My first reason standardized tests are not a good idea is that they overpopulate the schools. Texas takes 15 and Indiana takes 5. The tests take away time from learning more about a subject. Our country as a whole takes way to many standardized tests. standardized tests are overpopulating schools and not letting kids learn more parts of the subjects.

Standardized testing is an unfair way to judge how these students are making progress. Simply, some students do not test as well as other students do. There could be a very smart student that simply can not do well on test for whatever the reason may be, but the sad thing is we allow this to continue happening even when its totally unfair. Most of the time, students that come from a low-income family are treated the most unfairly. They attended poorly-funded schools with large class sizes, too many teachers without subject area certification, and inadequate books, laboratories and so on. States don’t put these schools into consideration that they don’t have the best education system. Instead, they continue to take it out on the students and deny them diplomas because of them not being about to afford a highly-funded school.

A Teachingabout.com “Examining the Pros and Cons of Standardized Testing,” Standardized testing allows students located in various schools, districts, and even states to be compared. Without standardized testing, this comparison would not be possible. Public school students in the state of Texas are all required to take the same state standardized tests. This means that a student in Amarillo can be compared to a student in Dallas. Being able to accurately analyze data is invaluable and is a primary reason that the Common Core State Standards have been adopted in many states. These will allow for a more accurate comparison between states.Yes, standardized tests allow students around the world to compare their scores. Although Connectusfund.org “10 Big Advantages and Disadvantages of Standardized Testing,” The tests do not really assess skill as the questions have to be generalized for the entire population. In short, the test items are not in conjunction with classroom skills and behavior. What standardized tests do is assess the general knowledge and understanding of students rather than their actual ability. Now would we really like to make students miserable by making them suffer through standardized test. So ask yourself do really think that students should take such horrifying things like standardized

What is standardized testing? Standardized testing is a test which is given to students to evaluate the knowledge which they know. Testing can be in all subjects and topics in education. In Minnesota there is the MCA ( Minnesota Common Assessment). The MCA can be taken from elementary to high school, and the students are tested on subjects they have learned from the past. In Minnesota the MCA is a test which the government requires students to take. On a national level there is the ACT and SAT. These are usually taken as entrance exams to colleges and universities. ACT and SAT are two different types of test they have differ in grading systems and some colleges take both or one of the two. Why are standardized test given? The test are given so people in charge can evaluate the performance of the student and school; also gage the knowledge of the student. But standardized test like the ACT can not be an effective way to improve instruction and performance because it is a competency focused test. The reason why standardized test are competence: They test students on how well they can eliminate the incorrect answers to find the correct one. This is an inefficient way because what if the test taker crosses out the wrong answer, this forces the taker to choose between two wrong answers. There's needs to be tested efficiently and accurately gage their knowledge.

“There is something deeply hypocritical in a society that holds an inner-city child only eight years old "accountable" for her performance on a high-stakes standardized exam but does not hold the high officials of our government accountable for robbing her of what they gave their own kids six or seven years before,” quote Jonathan Kozol. As this quote apptly states many children are often robbed of simple childhood pleasures by standardized testing. These strenuous tests should be cut back to the absolute minimum. Standardized tests should not be required because they provide unnecessary stress, are often inaccurate because of computer and human error, and some students, particularly minorities, are at a clear disadvantage.

State mandated testing came about in the mid late 1800’s. It is a assessment shown to see students abilities to learn a specific course and if they know the material. Present day in the United States state test can start being taken from elementary school to college . Trying to show if you have mastered the agenda that was brought over a course . State mandated test should not be required or pushed upon students in an everyday life because of the negative impacts it’s brings along that not only affects students but also teachers causing harm in many ways .

Since students know that state test scores are a big thing in their future, some students would even cheat on their test to get a better score. Including, state testing does not provide feedback to get a better score next year so they won't know how they can get a better score the next year.(source- Pros and cons of standardized testing)

In various ways, standardized test are beneficial from tracking students’ progress over the years to not allowing teachers emotions to get in the way of the testing process. Standardized testing sets expectations high for students and it does hold them accountable for the same standards, which may lead to achievement gains. By looking at the students’ performance they will be able to determine how well they retain information. Also the school is able to learn what their students are able to do and what they cannot do compared to other school districts, so they would be able to improve their education system. When giving more personal assessments, it is very possible “that the teacher or person assessing the student can let their emotions or biases affect how they score that student” (Young). In most cases, standardized tests are objective. There are wrong or right answers, and there is no room for feelings or emotions. Standardized testing gives teachers guidance to help them determine what to teach students and when to teach it. Tests are highly accountable and reliable as they judge the candidates on a common platform across states and nations. Standardized testing is “a simplified way of timeline management” (A Look at the Pros and Cons of Standardized Testing). Standardized testing gives parents a good idea of how their children are doing as compared to students across the country and

Why use a test that is doing no good? There is no need to use these high stakes test that could hinder a student's future. Doesn't we want students to pass and live a successful life? The use of other ways including inspections, portfolio-based assessments, and even sampling would not just benefit students and teachers but also the state because they would receive more accurate data that would benefit them rather than the state test. Clearly state testing should be a thing of the past because it does not adequately measure student skill, does not work with students with a learning disability, it takes chunks of time out of classroom learning, and it ultimately affects the state budget. Evidently state testing is not a good way to test students because it determines decisions that end up reflecting on students educational

Picture a monkey, elephant, and fish all being told to climb a tree to pass a test. It seems like an unfair advantage, right? That’s because it is, and standardized tests have the same effect on students. The dispute of whether standardized tests should be given to students or not has been going on since these tests were first given. Students should not have to pass a statewide standardized test before graduating because every individual has a different way of showing knowledge, students get test anxiety, and everyone possesses different learning levels.

The first reason is that standardized test are unreliable. Different states have different standards and take different test, so the questions aren't all the same. The questions are not always worded correctly. Sometimes they use challenging vocabulary. Other times, they aren't over things that you need to know. Standardized testing is unreliable.

In conclusion State Tests are not needed in our schools. They have too many problems. From condensing time and curriculum, to stressing students, to testing trouble, the State Tests do not do enough for the school to outweigh the

Standardized test are a big issue in today’s education system. Some people feel that they are stressful to students. Others feel that they are good for measuring educational growth. This argument gets more in depth when it comes to standardized test being a requirement for a student to graduate. This is because you could have a student that is very intelligent but is not a good test taker, and if they do not meet the state standards on standardized test they will not graduate regardless of how smart they are and many feel this is unfair. On the other hand, some feel that having these test as a graduation requirement is a good thing because they show exactly what and how much a student has learned through the course of the year.From this argument

I’ve always thought that the statewide and national testing system would be a lot better, if there were some flexibility. If only there were some kind of way to let teachers assess students’ learning, or remove all but the most important tests. Oh wait, there is. Many countries already have such systems, and these are some of the countries that the United States most admires in international education comparisons. Advocates of the current standardized testing system argue that standardized testing is good because it essentially gives a