Statutory And Constitutional Analyses Are Important Than Others

Decent Essays
Statutory and constitutional analyses are imperative in many different ways. However, some elements pertaining to legal philosophy are more significant than others.
Statutory analysis is not as significant when compared to constitutional analysis; however, it still contains principal features. “The construction and application of provisions adopted by legislatures” envelops the purpose of statutory analysis (Coleman 271). Statutory analysis occurs strictly when the rights are indistinguishable, and the courts must serve as “the final interpreters of what statues provide (Coleman 272)”. When analysis begins to take place, one imperative aspect includes determining the means behind the statute. Because statutes are created at different times, it is debated if the meaning of the statute changes over time. With statutory analysis, “Authoritative judicial precedents may establish a meaning that differs from what judges now deciding a case believe was the probable original meaning (Coleman 275)”. Determining the meaning of the statute is critical as it leads to the necessary outcome. Different interpretations of the statute will lead to different outcomes; therefore, “whether the meaning is ‘original’ or based partly on non-original factors, the judge seeks an interpretation that is sound for judges generally (Coleman 277)”.
Another central aspect of statutory analysis is to apprehend readers understanding and legislative intent. The writer and reader will substantially coalesce
Get Access