Staying Put Sanders Analysis

Andrei Codrescu author of Notes of an Alien Son: Immigration Paradoxes, informs us of what and how immigrants who come to America feel about moving away. The move across land of ocean can feel overwhelming, and after reading Codrescu essay I can understand why some immigrants do move to America. Change must happen with countries that don’t hold respect for their own people. You hear over and over again in the media that sadly owns America and the world about how thousands upon thousands of immigrants from all over the world are making their way to the edge of America.

Human migration can be influenced by various different stressors, whether it be by choice, in hopes of starting a new adventure, or by force, fleeing brutal persecution of a certain threat. Each individual has a unique story, all coming from different backgrounds and places around the world. However governing and political bodies often need certain labels and categories in order to define such a diverse set of people. Such legal definitions seem unnecessary or extensive due to the limitations they pose onto one’s identity, but they are a byproduct of sketching lines on the landscape and securing borders, protecting those who inhabit and belong.

A lack of belonging can destroy a sense of placement in society. This statement is thoroughly explored in the poem, ‘Migrant Hostel’ by Peter Skrzynecki, investigating the concepts of alienation and dislocation through the migrant’s lack of acceptance by the Australian citizens. The migrants are also unable to find a fixed home, and therefore feel no sense of stability or permanence. This transitory nature is best identified in the simile, ‘We lived like birds of a passage/Always sensing a change/In the weather’, where the comparison to birds emphasises the absence of a home. It is clear that the migrants feel unable to adapt to Australian society, constantly moving and never settling. The migrant’s exclusion is further highlighted in the lines,

People who tend to migrate a lot are less applicable of understanding and appreciating new ways of life. In response to an essay by Salman Rushdie on the benefits of moving, Scott Russell Sanders, in his essay “Staying Put: Making a Home in a Restless World,” claims that people should not immerse themselves into places but rather into ideas and values and also that people should care for the earth rather than for their egotistic desires. Through his use of a nostalgic tone and implied metaphors Sanders critiques Rushdie’s claims about the negative impact of migration and he also demonstrates why it is better for people to immerse themselves to their location rather than old beliefs and habits.

Sanders uses rhetorical questions in the passage to cause the reader to further ponder upon why individuals rooting themselves in ideas posses negative impacts, while individuals rooting themselves in places has positive impacts. In the passage the author notes, “But who would pretend that a history of migration has immunized the United States against bigotry?” (Sanders 40-41). This piece of text in the passage easily displays the use of a rhetorical question because Sanders is

Thus, he evokes the support of his idea that moving is unreasonable and illogical within the reader. In addition, the author opposes Rushdie’s “enthusiasm for migration” by quoting Rushdie’s words on the elimination of nationalism that comes with moving. Sanders then says, “... who would pretend that a history of migration has immunized the United States against bigotry? And even if, by uprooting ourselves, we shed our chauvinism, is that all we lose?” (lines 40-43)

“Who would pretend that a history of a migration has immunized the United States against bigotry?” In Staying Put: Making a Home in a Restless World, Scott Russel Sanders uses this rhetorical question to convince his readers to think more logistically about migration. He pries open the eyes of Americans and shows them the damage that moving can cause, as opposed to Salaman Rushdie’s thoughts that it was only positive.

The author, Scott Russell Sanders; in his essay ¨Staying Put: Making a Home In a Restless World,¨ carefully crafted use of diction, imagery and figurative language generates his unfavorable attitude towards people ceasing to be migrants, instead of becoming inhabitants. His purpose is to respond to an essay written by Salman Rushdie and to convince the reader to stop uprooting themselves when things get tough and to settle in to where they are and ¨make it durable and long lasting¨. This purpose was created by direct quotes and explanations, yet respectful opinion.

Scott Sanders has a very specific view when it comes to moving. When responding to Salman Rushdie’s essay, Sanders uses specific devices and strategies to develop his perspective. Sanders quotes parts of Rushdie’s essay to express his views on moving.

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. , president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference and most recognized human rights activist in the sixties, tries to convince the clergymen that his non violence sit ins are the only way to get freedom for the Negros in Birmingham Alabama in his ”Letter from Birmingham Jail”. He is responding to the clergymen argument that his non violent sit ins are untimely and unwise. He uses a mixture of rhetorical analysis factors to get his point across. King formulates his cause through logos, ethos, and pathos, by giving several key points to make his argument in his letter. He argues that his direct action program is the only

Because Sanders’s essay is written in response to Rushdie’s essay, he quotes phrases from Rushdie’s original essay numerous times and then states his own beliefs. Sanders first quotes Rushdie in saying that, “a migrant is perhaps… the only species of human being free of the shackles of nationalism” (lines 34-36). Sanders responds to this point by asking what the world could do with less nationalism. By quoting Rushdie directly, Sanders shows his audience that he really cares about the topic, stating his own belief that moving does nothing to rid us of the unfortunate aspects of

Sanders addresses Rushdie’s writings with many devices to explain his vision and interpretation. Sanders lists many of our “heroes” as a way to address that we consciously like travelers, and equally we do not like staying put. Hyperbole is used in line 17 to show how often people in this country like to keep moving, saying that if you were to stop moving, like a shark, you would die. He then uses parallelism to usurp a quote from Rushdie. He brings up the bad sides of nationalism as well as using satire to

Have you ever moved to a new place or moved around trying to find a better life? Lennie and George moved multiple times in the book Of Mice and Men, and so did Pasha in the article “Syrian Migration”. There are many causes and effects of how migration can change your daily life.

Migration is a common process, which happens in all parts of the world. In definition, migration is the movement of people from one location to another. This process is triggered by many factors. Generally, people migrate in order to search for better lives in other locations, Migration is the same as all other processes, therefore it has its main causes and effects. In the book, The Distance between Us, Reyna Grande is able to look at those challenges, which come from migration, and successfully solves them. In addition, migration has benefits to the countries as well. As a result, through migration, the labor force in a country is able to increase, helps to reunite families and creates better wages through competitive labor force.

Through Sander's cynical diction, Sanders lets the the readers deliberately realize the counterargument that he will present. "Promised Land" (line 5), "crumbling" (line 21), "bigotry" (line 42) and "quarrel" (line 63), are all puzzled throughout the unclear beginning. The so what called "heroes" (line 3) of the ancient