Stem Cell Research Argument

Stem cell research has been quite a controversial topic since its origin in the 1960s by Gopal Das and Joseph Altman. Of course, anything that uses a human embryo would be. Stem cell research could open a vast number of new doors for modern science, it could let us test new drugs, one of which could be the unfound cure for AIDS or Alzheimer’s disease. However, this branch of science comes at a high price, the price of a human life that is only five to six days

The pros of Stem Cell Research and Treatment are never ending. There is an account of two women being completely blind, but due to stem cell research, their sight was repaired. Another case is that of a ninety-five year old woman who was taken off medication and her health somewhat restored due to the use of stem cells. Doctors were able to inject stem cells into her heart and they took the shape of heart neurons.

There are many benefits that come from stem cell research; the government should be more open to obtaining stem cell research in other manners because it can be used to regenerate brain cells, it promotes nerve repair, and insulin secreting cells. If the government was to be more open to obtaining stem cell lines in other ways than just donations from fertility clinics, there would be much more stem cells available to be cultured. Since there have been so many limitations set on stem cell research, it has been difficult for scientist to find the many benefits of stem cell therapy. As far as we know, stem cells could be used for the possible cure of incurable diseases such as, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, diabetes, and paralyzed human beings. Alzheimer and Parkinson’s disease are caused primarily due to the loss of brain cells, which our body does not regenerate. With other common diseases such as diabetes, stem cell therapy can play a role if they promote insulin secreting cells, which are the cells that humans with diabetes are lacking. It is very likely that these incurable diseases can be cured by stem cell therapy if it became easier to obtain such stem cells.

Richard’s response to the question clearly comes from a more capitalistic and economic standpoint. However, he still manages to touch upon the heart of the issue and the overall goal, which would be promoting the common good. He recognizes that the demand for healthcare certainly does exceed the supply however he fails to offer a legitimate proposed solution. Murray, on the contrary, does offer some insight on this. She argues from the Catholic perspective that one must have a preferential option for the poor, which embraces the poor class with a genuine purpose. She points to the fact that the Catholic Church has advocated for a Universal Healthcare system since it ultimately is their belief that health and healthcare access is a fundamental

Incurable and degenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and cancer cause death of millions of people annually. Scientists use drugs to treat symptoms, but they don’t have effective therapies for cure these diseases. Embryonic stem cells have treatment potential due to their pluripotent characteristic, which means that they can develop into any cell of the human body. Some people oppose embryonic stem cell research since they think it violates human rights and thus should not be allowed to pursue. However, embryonic stem cell research is ethical since five-day-old embryos lack most of the human characteristics, embryonic stem cells have the potential to cure degenerative diseases, and they are better to other kinds

The controversy over stem cell research’s use in the medical field is almost two decades old. So why the sudden intense return of fierce political debates over an old issue? It’s because President Obama recently revoked the ban on stem cell research, as he believes it holds the potential to revolutionize the medical industry in the years to come. As USA Today quoted him saying in March, after he stopped restricting federal funding for stem cell research, "At this moment, the full promise of stem cell research remains unknown and should not be overstated. Scientists believe these tiny cells may have the potential to help us understand, and possibly cure, some of our most devastating diseases and conditions."

The embryonic stem cells can become any type of cells that are needed. But the adult cells only can become a select few. And embryonic stem cells can be grown relatively easy. Totipotent is the most versatile cells they are made when a sperm cell reaches an egg and makes a fertilized egg. This is a totipotent egg which means it can become any cell that the body could need.

Catholics are absolutely against embryonic stem cell research. News is already talking about how the Catholics approve for stem cell research but inside of an interview with Catholic News Service Nancy O’Brien wrote: “Declaring that the stem-cell research does not present a conflict between science and religion, the U.S bishops overwhelmingly approved a statement June 13th calling the use of human embryos in such research “gravely immoral” and unnecessary” (O’Brien “Catholic News Service”). As you can see from that message, Catholics are all for the stem cell research however they hate the fact that embryos are involved and are even working up to get that taken care of. This research is honestly going against everything that Catholics believe in. Multiple times inside of this document that was submitted and approved was multiple statements of immoral judgements. One quote inside of this document that really stood out is, “The issue of stem-cell research does not force us to choose between science and ethics, much less between science and religion” (O’Brien “Catholic News Service”). This quote really hit the spot on this view because it has a good point, science and religion are starting to seriously get some tension between them. The more we become technology oriented and the more we find out different ways to do stuff then the more we are going to step on someone’s toes. This quote really hit that by saying that ethics and science don’t go as much together as science and

At first glance, in the case of federal funding for embryonic stem cell research, it seems too obvious to protect. Why not provide support for research, are promising for the treatment and management of disastrous diseases, such as Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, diabetes and spinal cord injury of the government. Critics of stem cell research offer two main influences: Some believe that stem cell research is wrong, despite worthy goals, because it involves the destruction of human embryos; Others fear that even if research on embryos is not wrong in itself, it will open the way for the slippery slope of inhuman methods such as embryo farms, cloned babies, the use of spare parts and the commodification of human

People believe researchers are killing an innocent person, Weiss mentions, “Those embryos are each smaller than the period at the end of this sentence. They have no identifying features or hints of a nervous system” (1). That goes to show that the embryo is not fully grown yet, which means researchers are not killing a human being. Instead of using embryo stem cells, the people who are against it believe that adult stem cells should be use because they are more mature, but Weiss mentions that embryo stem cells could become any type of cell throughout the body (3).

I think that stem cell research could be a really really good thing for everyone. Stem cell research could be a really good thing if we wouldn’t have to kill embryo’s to get the embryonic stem cells. If the stem cells could be created from adult stem cells or from embryonic stem cells we already have than it would be great because than we could save people and also save the babies. But if we have to kill the embryos in order to get the embryonic stem cells than I would definitely not support it.

Ever since the early days of human civilization , well-being has been the most fundamental aspect and people have always been searching for a healthy lifestyle. Due to the discovery of new medical progress, humans become healthier and their life expectancy tends to increase. Among these breakthroughs, stem cell research, which is relatively new, turns out to be useful in finding ways for a better and longer human life. The development of such technology could yield many significant medical potentials and highly productive results. However, there have been numerous arguments, posing the stem cell research. Despite its rapid success, many people did not want this process to continue for the variety of reasons. This essay, however, will argue that stem cell research should be maintained, in order that there can be further improvement in medical and scientific discovery. It will do so by investigating the issues, that are connected with the research, mainly focusing on utility, cost-efficiency and views of the society.

There are many reasons on which stem cell research should be continued to help possibly cure many diseases. Stem cells are a type of cell unlike most other cells. These cells differ from most cell in two ways. Stem cells are known as unspecialized cells capable of renewing themselves through cell division. Secondly, under certain physiologic or experimental conditions, they can be introduced to become tissue and or organ-specific cells with special functions. Stem cells are known to be a replacement for cells that have gone through normal wear and tear such as injuries or diseases. With this type of cell being able to replace other cells when old cells are destroyed or ruined. With their unique ability to regenerate they can be used to treat certain diseases such as heart disease and diabetes. This could also be used to treat certain types of

Certainly nobody has one-hundred percent confirmed the possibilities for stem cells cures. However, the possibilities for stem cells come at somewhat of a cost. Not many people have thought about the dangers of the stem cell treatments. Stated in an article published by Gale, “Even once embryonic stem cells can be produced in quantity overcoming the inefficiency of today 's methods and potential problems (e.g. efficacy of viruses in implanted cells, use of c-Myc that is known to play a role in the progression of cancer), further research will be needed to determine and provide the correct instructions for an embryonic stem cell to grow into its desired path....” (Sutherland). Not knowing how to properly grow the stem cell into its desired path can result in treatment rejection and also major side-effects including muscle spasms and uncontrolled movements/shaking. So, stem cells have potential to be useful in the future but should not be used for any official treatments yet.

Research on stem cells is knowledge constantly being explored about how an organism evolves from a single cell and how cells in good condition are put in place of cells that no longer work. The outcome that is anticipated from doing this research is that if scientist can fine tune stem cells into regular cells like blood or heart muscles and put it back into the body, then possibly they may find a cure for some of the widespread diseases that exist in our world today such as diabetes, leukemia, and many more by replacing those weak cells with youthful cells. Eventually this research might lead to realistic, reasonably priced ways to get rid of many diseases through DNA engineering but is it really worth