Stem Cell Research Argument

The controversy due to embryonic stem cells is quite debatable. Both sides present many strong reasons that prove their point, but it is still, frankly, nearly impossible to take a stand from an unbiased view. "This is the first study showing that embryonic stem cells can be used for brain and spinal cord repair in an animal model of a human neurological disease," said researcher Oliver BrŸstle (a neuropathologist at the University of Bonn in Germany) referring to the study done on rats (CNN). Just like Oliver BrŸstle many scientists around the world agree that embryonic stem cell show much welcomed hope of cure of spinal and brain repair. In addition to healing spinal and brain injuries, the embryonic stem cells can also treat diabetes, a disease which 54%

Through change and uttermost struggle, the people who care about a subject always seem to push through for what they believe in. For the sake of Embryonic Stem Cell research, the advocates tried their best to show the advancements stem cells may withhold, and for the people who disagree with the research, always seemed to put a new light on the subject, simply humanizing the research. Although the destruction of a human embryo is not something many people would view as ethical, it is something that could hold much promise for those who suffer from terminal illnesses (Sherley). When the miracle of assisting those who could not reproduce children through In Vitro Fertilization transpired the world of stem cell research was acquired (Tauer 924).

There are many benefits that come from stem cell research; the government should be more open to obtaining stem cell research in other manners because it can be used to regenerate brain cells, it promotes nerve repair, and insulin secreting cells. If the government was to be more open to obtaining stem cell lines in other ways than just donations from fertility clinics, there would be much more stem cells available to be cultured. Since there have been so many limitations set on stem cell research, it has been difficult for scientist to find the many benefits of stem cell therapy. As far as we know, stem cells could be used for the possible cure of incurable diseases such as, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, diabetes, and paralyzed human beings. Alzheimer and Parkinson’s disease are caused primarily due to the loss of brain cells, which our body does not regenerate. With other common diseases such as diabetes, stem cell therapy can play a role if they promote insulin secreting cells, which are the cells that humans with diabetes are lacking. It is very likely that these incurable diseases can be cured by stem cell therapy if it became easier to obtain such stem cells.

The embryonic stem cells can become any type of cells that are needed. But the adult cells only can become a select few. And embryonic stem cells can be grown relatively easy. Totipotent is the most versatile cells they are made when a sperm cell reaches an egg and makes a fertilized egg. This is a totipotent egg which means it can become any cell that the body could need.

Stem cells should definitely be researched and experimented on. Doctors and scientists have high hopes that stem cells in the future can cure many conditions and diseases. The diseases that can be likely

Richard’s response to the question clearly comes from a more capitalistic and economic standpoint. However, he still manages to touch upon the heart of the issue and the overall goal, which would be promoting the common good. He recognizes that the demand for healthcare certainly does exceed the supply however he fails to offer a legitimate proposed solution. Murray, on the contrary, does offer some insight on this. She argues from the Catholic perspective that one must have a preferential option for the poor, which embraces the poor class with a genuine purpose. She points to the fact that the Catholic Church has advocated for a Universal Healthcare system since it ultimately is their belief that health and healthcare access is a fundamental

Incurable and degenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and cancer cause death of millions of people annually. Scientists use drugs to treat symptoms, but they don’t have effective therapies for cure these diseases. Embryonic stem cells have treatment potential due to their pluripotent characteristic, which means that they can develop into any cell of the human body. Some people oppose embryonic stem cell research since they think it violates human rights and thus should not be allowed to pursue. However, embryonic stem cell research is ethical since five-day-old embryos lack most of the human characteristics, embryonic stem cells have the potential to cure degenerative diseases, and they are better to other kinds

The controversy over stem cell research’s use in the medical field is almost two decades old. So why the sudden intense return of fierce political debates over an old issue? It’s because President Obama recently revoked the ban on stem cell research, as he believes it holds the potential to revolutionize the medical industry in the years to come. As USA Today quoted him saying in March, after he stopped restricting federal funding for stem cell research, "At this moment, the full promise of stem cell research remains unknown and should not be overstated. Scientists believe these tiny cells may have the potential to help us understand, and possibly cure, some of our most devastating diseases and conditions."

In an article written by Deborah White she states, “no cures have yet been produced by embryonic stem cell therapy.” We are wasting all this time using methods that haven’t even made a positive impact on our community, when we could in fact be finding other less harmful and controversial means of curing diseases.

At first glance, in the case of federal funding for embryonic stem cell research, it seems too obvious to protect. Why not provide support for research, are promising for the treatment and management of disastrous diseases, such as Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, diabetes and spinal cord injury of the government. Critics of stem cell research offer two main influences: Some believe that stem cell research is wrong, despite worthy goals, because it involves the destruction of human embryos; Others fear that even if research on embryos is not wrong in itself, it will open the way for the slippery slope of inhuman methods such as embryo farms, cloned babies, the use of spare parts and the commodification of human

Catholics are absolutely against embryonic stem cell research. News is already talking about how the Catholics approve for stem cell research but inside of an interview with Catholic News Service Nancy O’Brien wrote: “Declaring that the stem-cell research does not present a conflict between science and religion, the U.S bishops overwhelmingly approved a statement June 13th calling the use of human embryos in such research “gravely immoral” and unnecessary” (O’Brien “Catholic News Service”). As you can see from that message, Catholics are all for the stem cell research however they hate the fact that embryos are involved and are even working up to get that taken care of. This research is honestly going against everything that Catholics believe in. Multiple times inside of this document that was submitted and approved was multiple statements of immoral judgements. One quote inside of this document that really stood out is, “The issue of stem-cell research does not force us to choose between science and ethics, much less between science and religion” (O’Brien “Catholic News Service”). This quote really hit the spot on this view because it has a good point, science and religion are starting to seriously get some tension between them. The more we become technology oriented and the more we find out different ways to do stuff then the more we are going to step on someone’s toes. This quote really hit that by saying that ethics and science don’t go as much together as science and

People believe researchers are killing an innocent person, Weiss mentions, “Those embryos are each smaller than the period at the end of this sentence. They have no identifying features or hints of a nervous system” (1). That goes to show that the embryo is not fully grown yet, which means researchers are not killing a human being. Instead of using embryo stem cells, the people who are against it believe that adult stem cells should be use because they are more mature, but Weiss mentions that embryo stem cells could become any type of cell throughout the body (3).

Stem cell research is a proposal to use human embryos to grow stem cells or master cells that form immediately after a human egg is fertilized. The cells are called master or stem, because they can develop into all parts of the body, brain, blood, skin and muscle. Stem cell research is a very controversial topic around the world. Some believe that we as humans should not play god and leave the human life alone. Others believe it is good because it helps with a countless amount of diseases and health problems.

Ever since the early days of human civilization , well-being has been the most fundamental aspect and people have always been searching for a healthy lifestyle. Due to the discovery of new medical progress, humans become healthier and their life expectancy tends to increase. Among these breakthroughs, stem cell research, which is relatively new, turns out to be useful in finding ways for a better and longer human life. The development of such technology could yield many significant medical potentials and highly productive results. However, there have been numerous arguments, posing the stem cell research. Despite its rapid success, many people did not want this process to continue for the variety of reasons. This essay, however, will argue that stem cell research should be maintained, in order that there can be further improvement in medical and scientific discovery. It will do so by investigating the issues, that are connected with the research, mainly focusing on utility, cost-efficiency and views of the society.

Stem cells are cells with the ability to divide for indefinite periods in culture and to give rise to specialized cells. They have the potential to develop into several different types of cells within the body during early life and growth. When a stem cell divides, they can either remain a stem cell or become another type of specialized cell (NIH, n.d.). Scientists use these cells because they give them the opportunity to "engineer" stem cells for use in transplants or disease treatments. For example, before scientists can use any kind of tissue, organ, or cell for transplantation, they must make sure that the patient’s immune system does not reject the transplant. In the future, however, scientists may be able to change stem cells by using