Stem Cell Research Argumentative Essay

Stem cell research has been quite a controversial topic since its origin in the 1960s by Gopal Das and Joseph Altman. Of course, anything that uses a human embryo would be. Stem cell research could open a vast number of new doors for modern science, it could let us test new drugs, one of which could be the unfound cure for AIDS or Alzheimer’s disease. However, this branch of science comes at a high price, the price of a human life that is only five to six days

Embryonic stem cell is one of the most controversial, widely discussed medical issues in the United States today. The medical use of stem cell raises difficult moral and political questions. To understand about embryonic stem cell. I thought we should discuss what embryonic stem cells are. According to Scientific American; June 2004, embryonic stem are derived from the portion of a very early stage embryo that would eventually give rise to an entire body. Because embryonic stem cells originate in this primordial stage, or having existed from the beginning. They retain the pluripotent the ability to form any cell type in the body. To cell line create an embryonic stem cell, scientist remove the inner cell mass from a blastocyst created in

Unfortunately, embryonic stem cell research involves extracting stem cells from embryos, thus killing them in the process. According to Stanford.edu, “Opponents of HESC [Human Embryonic Stem Cell] research argue that the research is morally impermissible because it involves the unjust killing of innocent human beings.” Yes, these embryos are dying from the extraction of their stem cells, but the fact of whether or not this is killing innocent human beings solely depends on point of view. If you consider a five-day old embryo to be a human being, then perhaps you would consider this to be wrong, but you believe otherwise, then maybe you would agree with the sacrificing of these embryos for beneficial research. This is how embryonic stem cell research has been very controversial in prior years and even

Embryonic Stem cells have led to a very long line of discussion. Whether to see it as immoral not to pursue research or immoral to pursue research, it is nonetheless very difficult to discuss. Questions are uncovered during this debate, for example, Is killing possible life (Embryos) lesser or greater than saving the already living, such as people with incurable diseases? The debate goes deeper and deeper into moral judgment and it doesn't matter whether you are religious or not in this argument because in both cases it is a life. But what if it didn't have to be a life? Further forms of research may be used to help save lives both from people who have incurable diseases and the embryos. If such research can be formed without a moral block, performance of such research should not be delayed. The possibility to save loved ones is incredible, to do so without victimizing women for embryos and killing those embryos, which could possibly behold life, only to maybe

Scientists have generally agreed that stem cells are vital to the science and medical field for they may be the solution to treat and even cure several serious medical conditions. However, not all the types of the stem cell research is widely accepted. For instance, the Embryonic Stem Cell Research, which in recent years has been largely debated in the United States. This is due to the two major arguments following this research. One, embryonic stem cell research is necessary to unravel the possibility of improving human life. Two, embryonic stem cell research involves the abortion of potential human life. It is a debate whether the life of an individual suffering from a fatal illness or injury is more priceless, or the life of a human at one

In an event, a person becomes injured in a car accident and become paralyzed and blind. They would be unable to walk due to permanent spinal injury and have brain damage causing them to lose their eyesight. With such research in embryonic stem cells, the cells can be duplicated into healthy cells and replace the damaged cells to make a well-functioning organism. In spite of the controversy when it comes to obtaining the embryonic stem cells as they derive from a fertilized egg. It raises heavy opposing views that some say it is killing a human being and is morally wrong. They say this since extracting the stem cell from the blastocyst causes the embryo to actually die. However, the leftover embryos from an in vitro fertilization are going to be terminated anyways, “…it would seem logical that they can use in a manner that could benefit humanity tremendously” (Watts 459-460). For the sake of using stem cells, it will create a healthier society that is bound to increase the life span of each human

While few can debate the potential “miracle cure” aspect that seems to be wrapped within stem cell research, the method for obtaining such cells has been a topic for debate. The process of extracting pluripotent cells destroys their host embryo, and as yet, no pluripotent cells have been found in older adult tissues. Opponents of research on embryonic cells claim that embryos – from the moment that fertilization occurs – are sentient human beings and should therefore be afforded the same protections against abuse as anyone else (“The Cases For”). But what if a method were readily available were viable stem cells could be extracted from an embryo in a manner that would not deny life – however such life were defined – to the unborn fetus? What if such a potential solution could ease the minds of not only those who oppose stem cell research but also help to quell the dispute of another “Do Not Kill” issue – abortion?

Embryonic stem cells are undifferentiated cells from a human embryo which is the beginning development of a baby. Due to the cells being undifferentiated that gives researchers the opportunity to give them a function without problem. Unlike adult stem cells, which are differentiated, that doesn’t give as many opportunities because the area it came from for example a spine cell it has to be put in another spine or it can cause complications. But this is one of the most controversial topics in the science world today due to many not minding the use of embryos but others have religious reasons that say they aren’t allowed to use embryos.

People who decide to continue research on a project that can kill people are knowingly and willingly committing murder. Stem cell research has continued for thirty years with the knowledge of humans dying as a possibility. Although stem cells have the potential to cure diseases, the research should cease because the therapy causes the risk of cancer cells forming, allows the body to undergo great risks, and cause the spending of the government to increase immensely.

The two big issues that arise with this research is the way the stem cells are acquired, and what researchers do with the information gathered once it is acquired. According to an article by The Center for Bioethics & Human Dignity called “An Overview of Stem Cell Research”, “Human embryonic stem cells are the cells from which all 200+ kinds of tissue in the human body originate. Typically, they are derived from human embryos-often those from fertility clinics who are left over from assisted reproduction attempts. When stem cells are obtained from living human embryos, the harvesting of such cells necessitates destruction of the embryos.”(An Overview of Stem Cell Research). So basically, to acquire these stem cells which have the benefits of improving others lives, you must take away a potential life. The same article by explorable.com says “A life is a life and that should never be compromised. A fertilized egg should be valued as a human life even if it is in its very first weeks. Destroying human life in the hopes of saving human life is not ethical.”(explorable.com). The main problem with embryonic stem cell use is the ethical issues that come with it. But, one who takes embryonic stem cells into their body must be on medicine to prevent rejection for the rest of their life, which can be extremely cost. Moving on, the not-so-unethical alternatives also have their plentiful of issues.

Contrarily, supporters of embryonic stem cell research argue that such research should be pursued because the resultant treatments could have significant medical potential. In addition, leftover embryos could be given with permission and

specialized cell types as long as the person or animal are alive. They serve as an internal repair system;

Stem Cell Therapy is the use of undeveloped cells to repair or supplant harmed cells or tissues. Undeveloped cells are described by their capacity for self-restoration and their strength. The two principle undeveloped cell sorts are embryonic undifferentiated cells (ES) cells and grown-up immature microorganisms. In stem cell therapy, undeveloped cells supplant cells harmed by chemotherapy or malady or as a route for the contributor's insusceptible framework to battle a few sorts of growth and blood-related ailments, for example, leukemia. These transplants utilize grown-up undifferentiated cells or umbilical line blood. because Without a doubt, even bone marrow, stem cell transplants that have been being utilized for an impressive time span

Stem cells today have allowed doctors to conduct experimentations that could help discover the cure of various diseases that seem incurable. Through current clinical applications of stem cells, doctors have created various of stem cell therapy. Stem cell therapy is being use as a therapeutic option for a diverse group of genetic diseases such as cancer, Parkinson's, and muscular dystrophy. Cancer treatment most commonly uses somatic stem cells to decrease the amount of defective cells. Take leukemia for example. Leukemia is a type of cancer that is caused from leukocyte. What doctors first try on patients with leukemia is chemotherapy. IF chemotherapy does not reduce the sickle cells, then there is alternative procedures in place, it would

Technology is aiding diagnostics and medical research across the world as scientists have been able to find a cure for numerous major diseases. Now a group of scientists seems to have taken big step forward in helping people with lung disease. Researchers, including Manash Paul, Saravanan Karumbayaram and Preethi Vijayaraj from UCLA, started with stem cells created using cells from adult lungs.