In every human being a list of seemingly infinite cells and microbes exist, these cells feed on the nutrients from our body and use one another to help form the most sophisticated biological makeup on our planet. Occasionally and sometimes without a clear reason some cells break down, they lose their vigor or other outside elements tear them down. In this event, it causes certain functions of the body to malfunction causing potential negative outcomes. For example, your retinal cells can be coated with a virus or possibly just stop working properly one day subsequently leading to partial or full blindness. It can be a painful process and with no cure and little treatment a perfectly productive life can be completely stopped. However, in the …show more content…
This dilemma will not be solved until we are either all are religious, atheist or open-minded to a perspective not of our own. The latter has happened so very few times throughout history and even with that, no decision has ever been determined without some opposition. The only other solution to this is public health education and the scientific community to come together with everyone else. Many who do not condone stem cell research actually have little idea on what is used for and how it is harvested. In fact, a study found that 28% of americans have zero biology training, almost 50% discredit evolution saying it is unproven and one out of every four americans does not now the earth revolves around the sun. With this data it is clear that the american population when it comes to science is disturbingly uneven. Public health education then is the clearest course of action. In furthering to educate ourselves on health, biology, physics and chemistry these two opposing communities might be able to establish some kind of dialogue. Both pro-life and pro-science can look and interpret the scientific data that is present and use this knowledge to arrive at a logical concise conclusion. In the end, our perspectives on creation and life have to be of similar finalities and it is only then that we can come together and for the first time reach a close on the importance of stem cell
Research has shown that studying stem cells has provided possibilities for treating neurological disorders. Scientists have performed studies that have allowed blind patients to gain vision again and have also discovered that sustaining the blood-brain barrier could help in diseases such as Parkinson's disease. Many people find stem cell research unhealthy because of the pain women go through when donating. However, stem cell research has advanced people's knowledge tremendously when it comes to neurological disorders.
Stem cell research has been quite a controversial topic since its origin in the 1960s by Gopal Das and Joseph Altman. Of course, anything that uses a human embryo would be. Stem cell research could open a vast number of new doors for modern science, it could let us test new drugs, one of which could be the unfound cure for AIDS or Alzheimer’s disease. However, this branch of science comes at a high price, the price of a human life that is only five to six days
Through change and uttermost struggle, the people who care about a subject always seem to push through for what they believe in. For the sake of Embryonic Stem Cell research, the advocates tried their best to show the advancements stem cells may withhold, and for the people who disagree with the research, always seemed to put a new light on the subject, simply humanizing the research. Although the destruction of a human embryo is not something many people would view as ethical, it is something that could hold much promise for those who suffer from terminal illnesses (Sherley). When the miracle of assisting those who could not reproduce children through In Vitro Fertilization transpired the world of stem cell research was acquired (Tauer 924).
grow more and more complex. In a topic that has been debated for over a decade, embryonic
Embryonic stem cell research is the incandescent lamp of today's time. on October 21, 1879 in Menlo park Thomas Edison displayed his brilliant creation. Today we don't turn our heads without seeing a light bulb. That sort of success is what embryonic stem cell research can lead to. Edison had predecessors before him who had made incandescent light bulbs and today, we are at that stage. We haven't nearly reached our goal but are just witnessing the miracles of stem cells. In the course of history it has been proven that all great inventions and their inventors are doubted and shunned, is it coincidence that embryonic stem cell research is not supported? It is truly misunderstood. Embryonic stem cell research is simply the process of removing a fertilized egg from a woman then studying the stem cells found in the blastocyst. If support was given to this cause it could create cures and solve many biological mysteries. I have conducted research on this topic and this is fully beneficial to us
This year, eight million innocent lives will be lost due to cancer. (cdc.gov) Eight million lives. That is equivalent to the entire population of New York City being eradicated because of one ravaging disease. However, there is a way to prevent these deaths, and this way is embryonic stem cell research. Embryonic stem cell research has the ability to not only find cures to some of our nation’s most appalling illnesses, but it also involves beneficial utilization of the hundreds of thousands of unused embryos that die each year at fertility centers. For these reasons, it is essential that embryonic stem cell research be funded by the U.S. government.
Embryonic Stem cells have led to a very long line of discussion. Whether to see it as immoral not to pursue research or immoral to pursue research, it is nonetheless very difficult to discuss. Questions are uncovered during this debate, for example, Is killing possible life (Embryos) lesser or greater than saving the already living, such as people with incurable diseases? The debate goes deeper and deeper into moral judgment and it doesn't matter whether you are religious or not in this argument because in both cases it is a life. But what if it didn't have to be a life? Further forms of research may be used to help save lives both from people who have incurable diseases and the embryos. If such research can be formed without a moral block, performance of such research should not be delayed. The possibility to save loved ones is incredible, to do so without victimizing women for embryos and killing those embryos, which could possibly behold life, only to maybe
Scientists have generally agreed that stem cells are vital to the science and medical field for they may be the solution to treat and even cure several serious medical conditions. However, not all the types of the stem cell research is widely accepted. For instance, the Embryonic Stem Cell Research, which in recent years has been largely debated in the United States. This is due to the two major arguments following this research. One, embryonic stem cell research is necessary to unravel the possibility of improving human life. Two, embryonic stem cell research involves the abortion of potential human life. It is a debate whether the life of an individual suffering from a fatal illness or injury is more priceless, or the life of a human at one
Incurable and degenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and cancer cause death of millions of people annually. Scientists use drugs to treat symptoms, but they don’t have effective therapies for cure these diseases. Embryonic stem cells have treatment potential due to their pluripotent characteristic, which means that they can develop into any cell of the human body. Some people oppose embryonic stem cell research since they think it violates human rights and thus should not be allowed to pursue. However, embryonic stem cell research is ethical since five-day-old embryos lack most of the human characteristics, embryonic stem cells have the potential to cure degenerative diseases, and they are better to other kinds
Embryonic stem cell research has been a debated topic for many years now. After reading
One of the most controversial topics these days is Stem Cell Research. There seems to be a split opinion among societies about the research and whether it is socially and morally acceptable. As a society, we need to open our minds to the possibility of broadening our scientific horizons with stem cell research, and take the time to learn and understand whatever we can about it.
Abortion, gay marriage, and illegal immigration are all hot button topics currently being faced by Americans. As ardently as each side defends their stance on a controversial issue, an opposing side fights with equal diligence for the beliefs they feel should be valued by our nation. Perhaps nowhere is this battle more heated than in the fight over stem cell research. While supporters of this new field of science tout it’s potential to cure everything from blindness to paralysis, those against stem cell science liken the procedures used by scientists to murder. It is my intention to bring to light the positive benefits of stem cell research as well as counter the claims used by many Pro-life groups who believe the scientists driving this
Research on stem cells is knowledge constantly being explored about how an organism evolves from a single cell and how cells in good condition are put in place of cells that no longer work. The outcome that is anticipated from doing this research is that if scientist can fine tune stem cells into regular cells like blood or heart muscles and put it back into the body, then possibly they may find a cure for some of the widespread diseases that exist in our world today such as diabetes, leukemia, and many more by replacing those weak cells with youthful cells. Eventually this research might lead to realistic, reasonably priced ways to get rid of many diseases through DNA engineering but is it really worth
in mind, you probably didn’t do anything wrong. You know how sensitive they are . . . this sort of thing is common when working with stem
Stem cells today have allowed doctors to conduct experimentations that could help discover the cure of various diseases that seem incurable. Through current clinical applications of stem cells, doctors have created various of stem cell therapy. Stem cell therapy is being use as a therapeutic option for a diverse group of genetic diseases such as cancer, Parkinson's, and muscular dystrophy. Cancer treatment most commonly uses somatic stem cells to decrease the amount of defective cells. Take leukemia for example. Leukemia is a type of cancer that is caused from leukocyte. What doctors first try on patients with leukemia is chemotherapy. IF chemotherapy does not reduce the sickle cells, then there is alternative procedures in place, it would