A world free of agonizing disease and debilitating disabilities is what stem cell research promises.Although, a relatively new method, stem cell research yields endless possibilities for scientific advancement. These advancement in turn have the potential revolutionize the way future diseases are treated, even eliminating the diseases for good. Despite all the upsides, stem cell research has some controversial downsides that come with it. Stem-cell research has endless possibilities in terms of curing diseases, however it also raises an ethical issue in terms of acquiring the
Did you know that there are people who decides the fate of the future? Who gives human beings the right to play God? To decide who lives and who dies. There comes a time where we have to ask ourselves, how much of our lives will we let the government control? Embryonic stem cell research should be discontinued because our future is being decided by regular humans who make several mistakes.
There are pros and cons to stem cell transplants. I believe the pros outweigh the cons in stem cell research and is very beneficial in the end. Stem cells provide potential for finding treatments and cures to diseases including different cancers, diabetes, spinal cord injuries, Alzheimer's, MS, Huntington's, Parkinson's and more. Embryonic stem cell research is one of the most controversial researches.Recently there has been a success with the research, “Professor Mats Brannstrom, carried out the first womb transplant in 2014 which allowed a Swedish woman to give birth to a healthy baby boy. Since then he has undertaken nine more procedures resulting in a total of five births.”
or not it is ethically acceptable to study stem cells and their capabilities to further knowledge. Those who deem studying stem cells ethical, focus on the benefits that they can provide for people with diseases such as cancer and those who have permanent injuries. Those whose opinion is in opposition to stem cell research, support their claim by pointing out how taking an embryo’s stem cells kills it. There are are different arguments supporting both sides.
In recent years there has been lots of studying and scientific research regarding stem cells. Now there are people who wish to more widely implement it. I am arguing that stem cell research should be limited by the government because in many cases it is unethical and potentially dangerous. I will prove this by showing all of the ethical and moral standpoints, also the potential dangers with experimentation on humans.
Stem cells make up every organ and tissue that reside inside the human body. These cells help to regenerate and replace defective tissues and cells that are injured and destroyed within our body everyday. Former President, George W. Bush, felt so strongly opposed to the development of this research that he cast the first veto of his presidency when Congress tried to broaden the scope of the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2007. In this veto he stated that, “This bill crosses a moral line that I and others find troubling.” (1)
patients become greatly disappointing and disheartening and leads them to seek elsewhere. In a study that interviewed patients and their families after receiving stem cell therapies, one subject wrote, “The Chinese doctors are better than Canadian doctors, Canadian doctors are greedy, they work for the rich, but the Chinese doctors are happy to help, they are more responsible to their patients, and more professional” (Masters). Although whether a doctor decides on performing unproven therapies does not directly correlate with their skill, it does reflect on how they view their patients. Doctors who ensure treatment efficacy for their patient’s safety may be viewed as “greedy” or “unprofessional” for refusing care, but this viewpoint is a
For years, scientists have been using stem cells to help cure diseases and research different illnesses that come from deformed cells. In recent years, however, a debate has risen over where we should get these stem cells from. Because of the way stem cells are helping sick individuals and furthering research, the use of stem cells shouldn’t be stopped. The sources from which stem cells are acquired, however, should be limited. While acquiring adult stem cells is completely safe and productive, using embryonic stem cells is unethical in the way they are acquired. For this reason, the use of adult stem cells should be allowed, but the use of embryonic stem cells should be banned.
I am going against stem cell because it say it cure injuries and diseases but why haven't have doctors usd this to cure diseases? There isn't any real proof that says that they cure diseases. Anti-abortion groups also oppose research on stem cells derived from aborted fetuses. They reject the argument that since abortion is already legal and women will have them, that stem cells should be used from aborted fetuses because they would otherwise go to waste.Experience is already showing how a tragic coarsening of consciences accompanies the assault on innocent human life in the womb.
A controversy type of research would be stem cell research due to the fact it involves the development and the destruction of the human embryos. Scientists have divided the topic of stem cells into many aspects in order to obtain a method of testing and to expand more knowledge on stem cells.
If you had a friend who was paralyzed, or a relative with Alzheimer's, wouldn't you want them to be magically healed? Many scientists believe they found a cure. Stem cell research is a very controversial issue everywhere. Stem cells are found in fetal tissues and can turn into any type of cell known in the body.
In contrary with all the contribution of stem cell therapy in the medicinal industry the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is still in their regulation state. They have such recent promulgations that will regulate ng usage and transactions regarding the said therapy. They also had a jurisdiction with regards this matter. As they oppose, the specialists assigned in various fields of science such as biochemistry, biotechnology and pharmaceutics the FDA wants to first wake the awareness in each of them about the increased risk and interrogations in stem cell therapy. Lastly, the FDA would also want to provide recommendations on how such efficacy and effectivity made will devour the rising issues associated with stem cell
People tend to choose opposing sides in a good argument or debate but in reality, the truth is found in the middle. The opposite sides are a formation of distinct opinions that humans make for a simple black and white answer. We can see this in many different debates such as the constant stem cell development or if schools should have uniforms, but even in the running of our democratic republic government.
world free of agonizing disease and debilitating disabilities is what stem cell research promises. Although, a relatively new method, stem cell research promises endless possibilities for scientific advancement. These advancements in turn have the potential to revolutionize the way future diseases are treated, even eliminating the diseases for good. Despite all the upsides, stem cell research has some controversial downsides that come with it. Stem-cell research has endless possibilities in terms of curing diseases, however it also raises an ethical issue in terms of acquiring the stem-cells.
Since their discovery in the 1980s, stem cells have been considered one of the most exciting concepts in the scientific community. Stem cells represented untold implications for medicine, and for the last three decades researchers have continued to explore the many opportunities stem cell research has to offer. Today, the future of stem cells is still bright, and scientists are closer than ever to successfully implementing their clinical applications. However, stem cell research remains a highly controversial topic that raises many questions regarding the constitution of personhood and the creation and destruction of human life. These ethical considerations have been a frequent and unfair obstacle to research efforts. Stem cell research is one of the most groundbreaking developments in modern science and medicine, and while the ethical implications must be addressed as the new era of regenerative medicine emerges, it would be a great injustice to allow these questions to impede research. Stem cells are the future of medicine, and the opportunities stem cell research represents must continue to be explored in the coming years.
Stem cell research has many people on the fence. Some people love the idea while others hate the idea. However, most of them can agree that stem cell research takes a great deal of knowledge to perform the process. Scientists who execute stem cell experiments are all educated professionals. For over forty years, stem cell research and experiments are one of the main topics that have been debated such as, “Some of these discoveries have offered the hope that scientific breakthroughs may eliminate the political and religious deadlock over how to obtain human embryonic stem cells,” (Schlager and Lauer, 3). Stem cell experiments are a unique type of scientific discoveries that could one day change the world.