Stephon Clarkson Pros And Cons

When faced with a threat human instinct is to kill first instead of to be killed. Police are trained to disable a threat and as a last resort, kill. What does it say about America’s law enforcement when an officers’ victim is a person of colour who is unarmed? A recent and well known case of unjust demise by police is 22-year-old Oscar Grant. A young black man gunned down, whilst handcuffed, by a white police officer. Grant was unarmed and posed no threat to the officer. Similarly, 23-year-old Robert Tolan Jr. was given the same fate by an officer who allegedly received inaccurate information about a stolen vehicle. Like Grant, Tolan happened to be a black man shot by a white police officer while unarmed. No

Police ruthlessness against african americans have been among us for a considerable length of time . from slave days until the 20 century . Every last one of those passings of these youthful african americans have brought about a great deal of hurt and agony to a considerable measure of families. The most well-known killings in the unified states have been activated upon african americans. The vast majority of these killings are cause due to " generalization" while somebody will look upon an african american and consequently think " It 's a dark man, they might be perilous, destructive ,or even horrendous" . There are a large number of situations where police have not been charged for unlawful murdering .cops additionally have their own particular mystery codes that helps them in each circumstance that they may wind up in, either on the off chance that they are pure or not . Families need to live with the way that no equity will be given to them,because sadly the law dependably wins .

Seeing these events people conclude that these shootings are the result of law enforcements being bias to black or white people. But in“Paper finding no racial bias in shootings by police criticized” by Samantha nelson shares about the reality of the bias. Here she writes about a new study confirming that “black women and men are treated differently in the hands of law enforcements.. They are likely to be touched, handcuffed, and pushed to the ground…but when it comes to the most lethal form of force-police shootings- the study finds no racial bias”. She shares about Mr. Fryer a Black economic Harvard professor who studied the data of 1,000 shootings in major cities in America. In result, Fryer found that the results contradict to the image

On September 20th, 2016 in Charlotte, North Carolina, Keith Lamont Scott was fatally shot by police. Not an hour after he was shot, the story of the shooting spread like wildfire across the media and even though no investigation had occurred, the public came to a consensus that Keith Scott was killed due to him being African American. This consensus came from a livestreamed video by Scott’s wife in which she claims he was unarmed, followed police orders, and was simply reading a book. This belief led to three days of rioting which caused injury to over twenty police officers, nine civilians, and according to a Charlotte observer article written by Steve Harrison, the riots caused 4.6 million dollars in damages to the city. All this was done as a form of protest against “racism”. The truth came out after the investigation and trial that

Now don’t get me wrong I’m not saying that this doesn’t happen to white people because it does it just so happens that its never on the news or a big deal. But lately its been black people everytime I see this kind of thing happening its always the African Americans dying. So I hope one day the Cops can change this one

NAACP (The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People) reported in Oakland, California that from 2004-2008 37 out of 48 shootings by Officers, were African American (Lee). With weapons not found in almost half the cases (Lee). Of course, no Officers were charged. If there is so many African Americans being shot when more than half of them don’t have weapons, then Officers should be indicted for using such poor judgement and taking things too far. There is many other alternatives that Officers could use but instead they jump to their most deadly weapon. The NYPD reported that more African Americans have been shot between 2000 and 2011 than Hispanics and Whites (Lee). In New York, African Americans are usually the ones who are targeted by Police. Well, anywhere really because African Americans come as a threat to them and Officers automatically think they are up to no good. There has been at least 16 cities which have been investigated for police abuse (Lee). Although there is way more cities that have to be looked into. Each year between 2006 and 2012 there was on average 96 cases of a white police officer killing an African American (Lee). It’s really sad hearing about all these shootings but it’s something you get used to since it happens so

There are many ways to find your own truth in journalism. An example of how to find out the truth is to come up with your own conclusion after gathering information from multiple news stations. Another way to find out the truth is to use the SMELL test. The SMELL test is a test which makes you ask the question, “Why are they telling me this?”, “Where’s the evidence?”, “Does it logically make sense based on the facts?”, and “What’s missing in the provided information?”. Many people who are aware of the bias in the media will use many ways to come up with their own conclusion as to what the actual truth

I read an article on Forbes, titled "Marijuana Use During Pregnancy: Here's How Much It Has Risen," written by Bruce Y. Lee. The article is both informative and persuasive. Throughout the work, the author lists many facts, with credible citations, about the dangers of smoking marijuana while pregnant and how the number of cases has drastically increased. The persuasiveness of the article is found when Lee pushes his political agenda against marijuana, with facts that are not relevant to the specific topic. Overall, the article I reviewed contains pertinent information but would be more powerful if it did not have bias.

People must carefully sift through the abundant amounts of information from the media in order to find factual information and avoid dissonance in their lives from false media messages. Political, scientific, and social publications can include bias from the journalists, so kudos to the media for finding inventive ways to craft stories in order to sell their publications. Separating fact from fiction has always been difficult and it is increasingly becoming more difficult to discern as journalists have hidden agendas and tainted points of view. One must be vigilant and skeptical and gather information from many different sources in order to weed out bias and misinformation.

This source is a printed collection of works discussing the pros and cons of a biased media. It evaluated both areas equally however I found that the objective parts of the article were the most compelling. The article overall was unbiased and well balanced since it never took a side. I found many credible sources from the article that helped me pose a persuasive argument to demonstrate that every journalist should be objective. However further research was needed for I realized the article didn’t focus on the major disadvantages our current media layout has brought us.

We live in a world where information travels the globe instantly and is reported from a variety of outlets including newspapers, blogs, and even social media. To determine the authors’ motivation behind writing or reporting news, it is necessary to determine the validity of the report. Applying critical thinking techniques to detect media bias and propaganda are necessary to determining whether the information is factual and to becoming an independent thinker. To demonstrate how this can be accomplished, two news articles expressing contrasting views about the same event will be analyzed. This will involve identifying the source of the story, the main claims and supporting evidence of the articles, and

In the beginning of the course, I found it hard to identify media bias in electronic articles and news networks. The authors of these pieces concealed their personal opinions very well, and I was unaware of

We expect media without bias, but media is created by people who are biased. It is much wiser for people to think more about how to approach a neutral point of view rather than denying their biases. From birth, people have access to information through numerous media channels. Most of these media outlets are not neutral. Although some strive to defend neutrality, most of these media outlets are not neutral. People also have viewpoint that are derived from biased information because of the effects of the environment that they have grown up in and because of the information that they have accumulated from the media. This is because people only trusted sources that agrees with their viewpoints. People only hear the news from their favorite channel; the path of getting information does not change easily. However, in order to see the world objectively, a neutral perspective is needed. However, since there is usually no neutral media, it is necessary to have the ability to accept different kinds of information. This is a virtue that a person who accepts the media must have as a true neutral critic. Not only people who consume news, but also reporters conveying it need to understand this virtue as well.

News and media, specifically the language used by news and media outlets, has a very real effect on our consciousnesses and therefore our actions as a society. Negativity bias is very real and has a substantial effect on our overall world outlook. Similarly, how article titles are phrased drastically sways what information we retain and which articles we choose to read. It has been shown in various studies that subtle misinformation and so-called, ‘alternative facts’ lead to an overall shift in our consciousness as a society. Therefore, both news and media have a significant impact on our beliefs and mindset overall as a society through the employment of negativity bias, the specific phrasing of articles and their titles, and deliberate subtle misinformation to the public.

Mass media has become an essential part of the growth and well-being of the United States. In everything from campaigning to daily news coverage, television, radio, newspapers, and the internet all contribute to the updated political and environmental knowledge of the public. Having important, day-to-day information accessible at any time is an incredible advantage to the success and development of the American democracy. However, every piece of information released is not completely accurate and without bias. The reporters, newsmen, journalists, and other people contributing to the media, write their pieces in their own words according to the data they are given, drawing upon their own conclusions. While many publications are accurate and useful to its readers, some pieces rely not on facts and statistics, but on the author’s own personal opinions. Although I believe reporters should be free to release any story written with any style the reporter chooses (assuming the story is not degrading the rights or dignities of another person or persons), I also believe that the parts of publications that do not draw from factual data, but from the author’s point of view, should be labelled accordingly. By doing so, Americans can then feel safe in knowing that the information given to them is accurately stated, effectively terminating any confusion or manipulation of the public.