Introduction paragraph
Hook: -Ever since their introduction into athletics and sports, the use of performance enhancing drugs has evolved into a controversial concern.
Narrow focus: As most sports fans or athletes would know, much public knowledge and debate has derived dealing with the legalization of performance enhancing drugs.
Thesis: Any performance-enhancing drug in sports should be illegal and not in the slightest, tolerated.
Three sub points: -There are a handful of reasons for these drugs to stay banned; the dramatic health risks associated with the use of the drugs, the recognition and respect that natural talent is the point of sports, along with the bad public image and influence on the youth.
Body Paragraph #1
Topic Sentence:
…show more content…
The most common seen and reported side effects were the stunt bone growth, and reduced sperm count followed by depression. Physiological risks such as attacks of rage or psychosis may arise, as well as addiction that induces the user to the sense of invincibility.
Explanation: This goes to show not only do these drugs diminish the real meaning of competition, they also throw your body through several unhealthy phases, that may result in long lasting side effects and a shorter lifespan.
Counterclaim: Aside from these health risks, some of the public may argue that there are some health advantages from consuming these drugs. This includes the greater strength and athletic ability you gain along with additional muscle mass which helps you recover from injuries faster.
Rebuttal: On the other hand, we can all agree that the negative aspects of taking PEDs overpower the advantages. Do we really want to unleash these risks to the athletes we admire the most
Body Paragraph
…show more content…
He was admired until October 10th 2012, when the US anti-doping agency revealed that Armstrong cheated his way through his cycling career as he was found guilty of blood doping which gave him a competitive advantage over the other cyclists.
Explanation: If drugs and enhancers were granted for competitive game, it would be a match between who can afford and take the best drugs rather than the natural raw talent to those athletes who trained for their success.
Counterclaim: Many people may argue that the use of these drugs have enhanced the entertainment aspect of sports
Rebuttal: Although PEDs may intensify the entertainment of the action, the use of these drugs lessen the value of sportsmanship and fairness of the game itself.
Body Paragraph #3
Topic Sentence: Lastly, the use of performance enhancers by athletes can influence the choices of young athletes.
Evidence: If a young player, who is easily persuaded, sees his favourite athlete attaining victory through the use of these drugs, they will feel as if that is the only way to also reach
He ran a 9.79, which at the time was a new world record. A few weeks later his medal was taken away from him, because he tested positive for human growth hormones. Even though this was a great feet in the history of track and field, nobody will be able to say he did it with natural talent and athleticism. He would end up not being able to compete ever again. The senseless decision to take performance enhancing drugs could ruin an athlete’s entire career.
One athlete's decision to use performance enhancing drugs also exerts a powerful effect on the other athletes in the competition. As reported by Sports Illustrated, half of all recently surveyed Olympic athletes admitted that they would be willing to take a drug, even if it would kill them eventually, as long as it would let them win every event they entered five years in a row. This type of win at any cost mentality is pervading sports at all levels of competition and results in athletes
“Commentators claim that performance-enhancing drugs are not right or wrong, simply another strategy to improve performance” (Introduction to Performance-Enhancing Drugs). There are two main problems wrong with the use of drugs being legal. Health of athletes would drop devastatingly, and the true competition would become who gets lucky. “Some mourn the loss of yesterday's baseball heroes, while others argue that sport figures who use performance-enhancing drugs expose flaws in American culture” (Introduction to Performance-Enhancing
What exactly are Performance Enhancing Drugs (PEDs)? PEDs are defined as the use of a blood or drug product designed to improve one’s athletic performance. There is a vast range of controversy when considering this topic. The main conflict includes whether or not the drugs should be legalized. Athletes have been using forms of PEDs since the early medieval era. In forms of potions, herbs, and specific meals designed to “boost” their performance. However it wasn’t until the late 19th century, when the so-called “drugs” began to industrialize into a well-known product. The use of PEDs is an issue that cuts across all sports, regardless of tradition or technology. However, we
Drugs, they are a wonder of medicine. They can be very helpful, but they can also be very dangerous .Some athletes use peds, (performance enhancing drugs) for muscular growth and or endurance and an example of them are anabolic steroids. They give the user more muscular endurance and growth so they can work out longer and grow more muscle in a shorter amount of time. These drugs are used in athletics to help the athletes win and have pretty bad symptoms, not only that but it is unfair to the rest of the competition for them to have that kind of advantage. athletes usually are compelled to use drugs because they want to win at all costs.this, win at all cost, mentality is a reason why athletes use PEDs.we need to improve the regulations of peds in sports.
As great as sports is for our society, there is still a pressing issue regarding ethics in sports: the use of performance enhancing drugs in sports. There is a debate among athletes, owners and fans whether athletes should be able to use performance enhancing drugs . With that being said, performance enhancing drugs has had a negative effect on sports Athletes should not be able to use performance enhancing drugs because they have
Nobody would argue that the quality of sports is basically dependent upon the level of skill of its players. As the skills of the players improve, so too does the quality of the game. So why are substances that would further athletes’ skills beyond human levels so ostracized? Doping is the practice of using steroids and other illegal substances to boost performance in sports and athletics. The debate of the morality of such substances has been going on for decades and continues to affect the world of sports in many ways. At the moment, steroids and all other performance-enhancing drugs are banned in their entirety from nearly all sports in most countries of the world. Scandalous lawsuits involving athletes abusing substances are constantly popping up, usually involving players and athletes that were considered fan-favorites or even heroes. Performance-enhancing drugs should be allowed in sports because it would make it easier to control them, allow athletes to perform better, and widespread use of steroids would allow more solid research and advancements in the pharmaceutical field.
Mr. Smith states “The primary reason why performance enhancing drugs (PEDs) are outlawed in professional sports is that they give users an unfair advantage over the rest of the field” and that “legalizing PEDs would make life much easier for professional sports organizations currently
In all areas of sports, professional, college, and even high school, there is widespread illegal use of performance-enhancing drugs. It seems like you can’t go more than a week without hearing about somebody’s PED problems. Although there are many reasons for athletes to choose to use these drugs, the cost of such use, both to the athlete and to society can be extraordinarily high. The question that many people must answer to themselves is “is it worth the risk”. Therefore, it is important to understand why performance-enhancing drugs are used, the consequences of their use, and then apply that knowledge to how they are represented in the media.
The use of performance enhancing drugs (PEDs) among athletes in professional sports has caused an outrage all around the world for many years.
“…medical researchers believe that between 1 and 3 million youths and adults have taken anabolic steroids in one form or another specifically to enhance their looks or athletic performances,” stated Nuwer (Nuwer, 61). As astounding as these figures are, the number of performance drug users is steadily increasing. With this progressively increasing numbers, it is projected that millions more will use steroids in the immediate future (Newer, 61). Athletes have always sought an advantage in competition even if ignoring the law and their health if necessary. Using drugs of any sort to facilitate an athlete’s athletic ability should be illegal. The use of performance enhancing drugs is not only detrimental to the user but it also creates an
A statement from the website Skins, states "Most fans agreed that PEDs are the greatest threat to the future and integrity of sport (73% agree)", Skins 2014. Which, further fortifies the fact that PEDs in sport has the potential ruin the integrity of sport now and in the future. So this is why harsh actions need to be taken in order to save sport as a whole and not making it on big corruption. But then again the majority of Athletes taking PEDs see it as levelling the playing field. For example, in the sport of Cycling where a majority of the athletes have or most likely take PEDs, when your an athlete who's losing race after race due to the fact your rivalry are taking PEDs then you have the incentive to do so yourself in order to level this unfair playing field athletes are having to endure these recent
And finally, athletes are not taking them for medical reasons, but to gain an unfair advantage in their sport. The drugs are illegal, and make players prone to many diseases. Professional players should not be allowed to take performance enhancing drugs. Professional sports players should not be allowed to take performance enhancing drugs is that they are a hazard
Some of the greatest athletes in the history of sports are Barry Bonds, Sammy Sosa, and Mark McGuire. One thing they had in common was that they all were Kings of hitting home runs in the 1990s and early 2000s. Another thing they all had in common, they illegally took performance enhancing drugs (PEDs) during their careers in Major League Baseball. They have been labeled as having a high lack of sportsmanship, being a poor role model for children, and cheaters, which are a couple of reasons why none of these players have been elected into the hall of fame. There have been experiments and studies that have proved that the use of PEDs affects both the physical and psychological parts of the human body. This is why athletes should be banned
Performance-Enhancing Drugs (PEDs) are the great leveler, being the tool for athletes to bridge the unfair gap (Steadman). Athletes choose the amount of time and training they put in. This is the choice of the individual which makes it fair to everyone (Savulescu and others). The determination, effort, grit, and sweat that is put in, is the factor between who wants it and who does not (Steadman). This shows that